Literature DB >> 301591

Ischemic cardiomyopathy: medical versus surgical treatment.

S L Faulkner, W S Stoney, W C Alford, C S Thomas, G R Burrus, R A Frist, H L Page.   

Abstract

The natural history of patients with ischemic heart disease and depressed left ventricular function is dismal, and medical therapy has failed to alter its course. To assess the results of aorta-coronary bypass grafting in patients with coronary artery disease and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF less than or equal to 0.3), we compared 70 medically treated patients to 46 patients having aorta-coronary bypass grafting. The duration of follow-up was 6 to 72 months (mean 19 months). All patients had angina pectoris. Congestive heart failure was present in 56 percent (39/70) of the medical and 43 percent (20/46) of the surgical group. The medical group had a mean LVEF of 0.20 and a mean left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) of 29 mm. Hg. The surgical group had a mean LVEF of 0.21 and a mean LVEDP of 24 mm. Hg. Three vessel disease was found in 60 percent (42/70) of the medical group and 83 percent (38/46) of the surgical group. The operative mortality rate in the surgical group was 4 percent (2/46). There were four late deaths. The 2 year actuarial survival rate for medical and surgical groups was 47 percent and 83 percent, respectively. Significant improvement in angina pectoris and/or congestive heart failure was found in 16 percent (11/70) of medically treated patients and 95 percent (38/40) of the surgically treated patients. Aorta-coronary bypass grafting can be performed in patients with poor left ventricular function with a low operative mortality rate, relief of angina pectoris, and improvement in symptoms of congestive heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 301591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  7 in total

1.  Long-term survival of patients with low ejection fraction: surgical versus medical management.

Authors:  V Balu; L Szmedra; D Dean; J Bhayana
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1988

2.  Aortocoronary bypass grafting in patients without left main stenosis. Relation of risk factors to early and late survival.

Authors:  H R Phillips; R A Johnson; M A Hindman; G S Wagner; P J Harris; R E Dinsmore; H K Gold; R C Leinbach; A M Hutter; A J Erdmann; W M Daggett; M J Buckley
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-05

3.  Nontransplant surgical alternatives for heart failure.

Authors:  Edwin C McGee; Kathleen L Grady; Patrick M McCarthy
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-12

4.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with depressed left ventricular function: operative results and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S Sekine; R Kuribayashi; T Sakurada; H Aida; H Atsumi; T Abe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  The role of radionuclide angiocardiography in the preoperative prediction of pain relief and prolonged survival following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  R H Jones; R D Floyd; E H Austin; D C Sabiston
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with profound ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  F J Baumgartner; B O Omari; S Goldberg; A B Pandya; A B Pandya; A M Daland; S Sun; J C Millikin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1998

Review 7.  New Insights in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Giulio Agnetti; Massimo F Piepoli; Giuseppe Siniscalchi; Francesco Nicolini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.