| Literature DB >> 30158607 |
Qing Li1, Chao Xue2,3, Jian-Ping Liu1, Jun-Fei Wu1, Shan-Qing Yang4, Cheng-Gang Shao5, Li-Di Quan6, Wen-Hai Tan1, Liang-Cheng Tu1,2, Qi Liu2,3, Hao Xu1, Lin-Xia Liu7, Qing-Lan Wang8, Zhong-Kun Hu1, Ze-Bing Zhou1, Peng-Shun Luo1, Shu-Chao Wu1, Vadim Milyukov9, Jun Luo10,11,12.
Abstract
The Newtonian gravitational constant, G, is one of the most fundamental constants of nature, but we still do not have an accurate value for it. Despite two centuries of experimental effort, the value of G remains the least precisely known of the fundamental constants. A discrepancy of up to 0.05 per cent in recent determinations of G suggests that there may be undiscovered systematic errors in the various existing methods. One way to resolve this issue is to measure G using a number of methods that are unlikely to involve the same systematic effects. Here we report two independent determinations of G using torsion pendulum experiments with the time-of-swing method and the angular-acceleration-feedback method. We obtain G values of 6.674184 × 10-11 and 6.674484 × 10-11 cubic metres per kilogram per second squared, with relative standard uncertainties of 11.64 and 11.61 parts per million, respectively. These values have the smallest uncertainties reported until now, and both agree with the latest recommended value within two standard deviations.Year: 2018 PMID: 30158607 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0431-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962