| Literature DB >> 30158492 |
Abstract
We examined the relationship between Problematic Internet Use (PIU), sleep (sleep satisfaction, sleep duration), and experience of oral disease symptoms in Korean adolescents by gender. This cross-sectional study utilized the 6th (2010) Korean Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey. Participants comprised 74,980 students from 400 middle schools and 400 high schools nationwide. Among these, 73,238 students from 799 schools (38,391 boys, 34,847 girls, aged 13⁻18 years) were included in the analysis (inclusion rate = 97.7%). Multiple logistic regression and analysis of moment structures (AMOS) analyses were performed to identify meaningful relationships between the three factors. The "high risk group" of problematic internet usage had increased experience of oral disease symptoms (boys: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.63⁻2.28, girls: AOR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.50⁻2.63) compared to the general group. Boys who used the Internet for "5⁻6 h" had a higher risk of oral disease symptoms compared to those who used it for "less than 1 h" (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01⁻1.53); however, this difference was not significant in Models II and III. For girls, the risk of 5⁻6 h of use (Model I: OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.40⁻2.04) was higher than that of the boys. In addition, the difference was significant in Models II and III for girl students who used the Internet for 5⁻6 h. In subgroup analysis, the high-risk group had a higher odds ratio for mild symptoms of bad breath to severe symptoms such as sore and bleeding gums. In addition, in the path analysis, PIU affected sleep and indirectly affected oral health. Direct and indirect causal relationships between the three factors were confirmed. Therefore, it is important to recognize that PIU can have a detrimental effect on mental, physical, and oral health.Entities:
Keywords: Korea; Korean youth risk behavior web-based survey; adolescents; oral health; problematic internet use; sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30158492 PMCID: PMC6164655 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091870
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1A conceptual model for explanatory relationship between problematic Internet use, sleep, and oral health [12,17,19,32].
Oral disease symptoms experienced (number of participants with percentage in parentheses) according to general characteristics (N = 73,238).
| Variable | Category | Oral Disease Symptoms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| Sex | Boys | 23,973 (61.9) | 14,418 (38.1) | <0.001 |
| Girls | 24,551 (70.2) | 10,296 (29.8) | ||
| Grade | Middle School 1st (13-years-old) | 7557 (60.2) | 4911 (39.8) | <0.001 |
| Middle school 2nd (14-years-old) | 7559 (61.4) | 4740 (38.6) | ||
| Middle school 3rd (15-years-old) | 8183 (64.6) | 4420 (35.4) | ||
| High school 1st (16-years-old) | 8438 (69.4) | 3583 (30.6) | ||
| High school 2nd (17-years-old) | 8440 (68.9) | 3684 (31.1) | ||
| High school 3rd (18-years-old) | 8147 (70.4) | 3376 (29.6) | ||
| Academic Performance | High | 17,036 (65.1) | 8915 (34.9) | <0.001 |
| Middle | 12,795 (64.4) | 6856 (35.6) | ||
| Low | 18,693 (67.5) | 8943 (32.5) | ||
| Perceived Family Economic Status | High | 12,637 (59.7) | 8435 (40.3) | <0.001 |
| Middle | 22,558 (65.5) | 11,695 (34.5) | ||
| Low | 13,329 (74.1) | 4584 (25.9) | ||
| Living Status | Living with family | 45,885 (65.8) | 23,457 (34.2) | <0.001 |
| Living with relatives | 765 (67.9) | 355 (32.1) | ||
| Boarding, living in dorm | 1600 (67.4) | 665 (32.6) | ||
| Living in a care facility | 274 (53.0) | 237 (47.0) | ||
Data analysis used Rao-Scott χ2-test. p < 0.05.
Oral disease symptoms experienced (number of participants, with percentage in parentheses) according to health-related factors and problematic Internet use.
| Variable | Category | Oral Disease Symptoms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
|
| ||||
| Alcohol | Yes | 28,240 (69.6) | 12,118 (30.4) | <0.001 |
| No | 20,284 (61.2) | 12,596 (38.8) | ||
| Smoking | Yes | 13,738 (70.5) | 5647 (29.5) | <0.001 |
| No | 34,786 (64.2) | 19,067 (35.8) | ||
| Stress Level | Not at all | 725 (42.0) | 969 (58.0) | <0.001 |
| Not much | 5144 (51.4) | 4367 (48.6) | ||
| A little | 19,022 (63.8) | 10,647 (36.2) | ||
| A lot | 16,427 (72.5) | 6158 (27.5) | ||
| Very much | 7206 (75.3) | 2303 (24.7) | ||
| Sleep Satisfaction | Completely sufficient | 3073 (55.2) | 2438 (44.8) | <0.001 |
| Sufficient | 8866 (59.4) | 5950 (40.6) | ||
| Moderate | 16,123 (64.9) | 8443 (35.1) | ||
| Not sufficient | 13,726 (70.7) | 5471 (29.3) | ||
| Not at all sufficient | 6736 (74.3) | 2412 (25.7) | ||
| Sleep Duration | Less than 5 h | 5832 (66.4) | 2851 (33.6) | 0.201 |
| ≥5–7 h | 31,738 (65.9) | 16,040 (34.1) | ||
| ≥7–9 h | 10,382 (65.0) | 5528 (35.0) | ||
| More than 9 h | 572 (65.9) | 295 (34.1) | ||
| a PIU Group | General group | 45,340 (65.0) | 23,857 (35.0) | <0.001 |
| Potential risk group | 1468 (78.8) | 398 (21.2) | ||
| High risk group | 1716 (79.9) | 459 (20.1) | ||
| Time of Internet Use (hours/day, weekend) | Less than 1 h | 1408 (66.7) | 699 (33.3) | <0.001 |
| ≥1–2 h | 7859 (63.3) | 4478 (36.7) | ||
| ≥2–3 h | 10,279 (66.5) | 5162 (33.5) | ||
| ≥3–4 h | 7760 (68.5) | 3546 (31.5) | ||
| ≥4–5 h | 4552 (69.4) | 1988 (30.6) | ||
| ≥5–6 h | 2661 (73.4) | 998 (26.6) | ||
| More than 6 h | 3679 (72.4) | 1387 (27.6) | ||
a PIU: Problematic Internet Use. Data analysis used the Rao-Scott χ2 test. p < 0.05; Time of Internet use (N = 56,456): only respondents who answered “yes” to the former question were required to answer the latter.
Risk of oral disease symptoms according to problematic Internet use and sleep problems by gender.
| Variable | Model I a | Model II b | Model III c |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| General group | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Potential risk group | 1.78 (1.49–2.14) | 1.74 (1.45–2.09) | 1.59 (1.32–1.91) |
| High risk group | 2.25 (1.91–2.64) | 2.14 (1.82–2.53) | 1.92 (1.63–2.28) |
|
| |||
| Within 1 h | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ≥1–2 h | 0.85 (0.71–1.02) | 0.85 (0.70–1.02) | 0.86 (0.71–1.03) |
| ≥2–3 h | 0.98 (0.82–1.17) | 0.97 (0.81–1.17) | 0.96 (0.80–1.15) |
| ≥3–4 h | 1.05 (0.87–1.27) | 1.04 (0.86–1.27) | 1.01 (0.84–1.23) |
| ≥4–5 h | 1.04 (0.85–1.27) | 1.02 (0.82–1.26) | 0.96 (0.78–1.19) |
| ≥5–6 h | 1.24 (1.01–1.53) | 1.23 (0.99–1.51) | 1.13 (0.92–1.41) |
| More than 6 h | 1.16 (0.95–1.42) | 1.12 (0.92–1.38) | 1.03 (0.84–1.26) |
|
| |||
| Completely sufficient | 1 | 1 | |
| Sufficient | 1.15 (1.03–1.28) | 1.04 (0.93–1.16) | |
| Moderately sufficient | 1.45 (1.31–1.60) | 1.19 (1.07–1.31) | |
| Not sufficient | 1.87 (1.66–2.11) | 1.41 (1.25–1.59) | |
| Not at all sufficient | 2.01 (1.76–2.29) | 1.40 (1.23–1.60) | |
|
| 0.99 (0.97–1.02) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) | |
|
| |||
| General group | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Potential risk group | 2.27 (1.74–2.97) | 2.15 (1.65–2.80) | 1.89 (1.44–2.48) |
| High risk group | 2.41 (1.83–3.17) | 2.23 (1.70–2.93) | 1.98 (1.50–2.63) |
|
| |||
| Within 1 h | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ≥1–2 h | 0.90 (0.79–1.04) | 0.90 (0.78–1.04) | 0.89 (0.77–1.02) |
| ≥2–3 h | 1.05 (0.90–1.22) | 1.04 (0.90–1.20) | 0.96 (0.83–1.11) |
| ≥3–4 h | 1.19 (1.02–1.40) | 1.17 (0.99–1.37) | 1.04 (0.89–1.23) |
| ≥4–5 h | 1.35 (1.14–1.59) | 1.29 (1.09–1.53) | 1.12 (0.94–1.32) |
| ≥5–6 h | 1.69 (1.40–2.04) | 1.61 (1.33–1.94) | 1.38 (1.14–1.67) |
| More than 6 h | 1.48 (1.23–1.77) | 1.40 (1.16–1.67) | 1.17 (0.97–1.40) |
|
| |||
| Completely sufficient | 1 | 1 | |
| Sufficient | 1.06 (0.92–1.22) | 1.00 (0.87–1.16) | |
| Moderately sufficient | 1.26 (1.09–1.46) | 1.07 (0.93–1.24) | |
| Not sufficient | 1.59 (1.38–1.83) | 1.23 (1.07–1.42) | |
| Not at all sufficient | 2.10 (1.81–2.44) | 1.44 (1.24–1.67) | |
| Sleep duration | 0.99 (0.97–1.02) | 1.01 (0.99–1.04) |
a Model I: Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)); b Model II: Adjusted for perceived sleep satisfaction, sleep duration; c Model III: Adjusted for all covariates (gender, grade, perceived academic performance, perceived family economic status, living status, alcohol, smoking, perceived stress level); d AOR (95% CI): Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Subgroup analysis of the risk of each 6 oral disease symptoms according to problematic Internet use group.
| Variable | PIU Group | Model I | Model II a |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipped or broken tooth (Yes) | General group | 1 | 1 |
| Potential group | 1.29 (1.116–1.487) | 1.03 (0.872–1.211) | |
| High risk group | 1.60 (1.392–1.829) | 1.14 (0.977–1.334) | |
| Toothache when eating | General group | 1 | 1 |
| Potential group | 1.77 (1.590–1.971) | 1.53 (1.357–1.856) | |
| High risk group | 1.88 (1.702–2.083) | 1.71 (1.523–1.923) | |
| Throbbing and sore tooth | General group | 1 | 1 |
| Potential group | 1.66 (1.48–1.875) | 1.55 (1.349–1.786) | |
| High risk group | 1.96 (1.770–2.164) | 1.71 (1.520–1.927) | |
| Sore and bleeding gums | General group | 1 | 1 |
| Potential group | 1.65 (1.466–1.853) | 1.40 (1.215–1.601) | |
| High risk group | 2.11 (1.905–2.331) | 1.63 (1.458–1.827) | |
| Pain in tongue or inside Cheeks | General group | 1 | 1 |
| Potential group | 1.72 (1.501–1.969) | 1.49 (1.265–1.756) | |
| High risk group | 2.29 (2.052–2.548) | 1.90 (1.667–2.164) | |
| Bad breath | General group | 1 | 1 |
| Potential group | 2.05 (1.838–2.290) | 1.69 (1.497–1.900) | |
| High risk group | 2.66 (2.407–2.930) | 2.05 (1.825–2.298) |
a Model II: Adjusted for sex, grade, academic performance, perceived family economic status, living status, alcohol. smoking, stress level, sleep satisfaction, sleep duration, time of internet use; All six oral disease symptoms reference group: “NO”.
Figure 2Path diagram showing the casual relationships between problematic internet use, sleep, and oral disease symptoms. All values are standardized regression weights.