| Literature DB >> 30158356 |
Hiromitsu Ohmori1,2, Mashio Nakamura3, Akiko Kada2, Akiko M Saito2, Yoshitami Sanayama4, Tomoe Shinagawa5, Hiroshi Fujita5, Akiko Wakisaka6, Keiko Maruhashi6, Akiko Okumura7, Noboru Takizawa7, Hiroaki Murata8, Michiko Inoue9, Hideo Kaneko10, Hidekazu Taniguchi11, Masayuki Kawasaki12, Nozomi Sano13, Shinjiro Akaboshi14, Naoyuki Tanuma15, Sui Sone16, Masao Kumode17, Tomoki Takechi18, Yukihiro Koretsune19, Ryo Sumimoto20, Takeshi Miyanomae21.
Abstract
Sudden death in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities (SMID) is sometimes caused in part by pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) has drawn attention as a possible embolic source. Warfarin, which is a conventional therapeutic agent, is not easy to control appropriately, and daily management can be especially difficult in SMID patients. On the other hand, edoxaban tosilate hydrate, which has been newly approved for insurance coverage for the treatment of DVT, is not listed in the Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT-PTE guidelines). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation therapy (warfarin vs. edoxaban) in DVT treatment in SMID patients by means of an open-label, randomized controlled trial. The primary endpoint is the incidence of hemorrhagic events during 12 months of follow up.Entities:
Keywords: Severe motor and intellectual disabilities; deep vein thrombosis; duplex ultrasonography; edoxaban; warfarin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30158356 DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.MS651003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kurume Med J ISSN: 0023-5679