Literature DB >> 30158211

Assessing progress in protecting non-smokers from secondhand smoke.

Sean Semple1, Will Mueller2, Alastair H Leyland3, Linsay Gray3, John W Cherrie2,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in population exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) and consider two exposure metrics as appropriate targets for tobacco control policy-makers.
DESIGN: Comparison of adult non-smokers' salivary cotinine data available from 11 Scottish Health Surveys between 1998 and 2016.
METHODS: The proportions of non-smoking adults who had measurable levels of cotinine in their saliva were calculated for the 11 time points. The geometric mean (GM) concentrations of cotinine levels were calculated using Tobit regression. Changes in both parameters were assessed for the whole period and also for the years since implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland in 2006.
RESULTS: Salivary cotinine expressed as a GM fell from 0.464 ng/mL (95% CI 0.444 to 0.486 ng/mL) in 1998 to 0.013 ng/mL (95% CI 0.009 to 0.020 ng/mL) in 2016: a reduction of 97.2%. The percentage of non-smoking adults who had no measurable cotinine in their saliva increased by nearly sixfold between 1998 (12.5%, 95% CI 11.5% to 13.6%) and 2016 (81.6%, 95% CI 78.6% to 84.6%). Reductions in population exposure to SHS have continued even after smoke-free legislation in 2006.
CONCLUSIONS: Scotland has witnessed a dramatic reduction in SHS exposure in the past two decades, but there are still nearly one in five non-smoking adults who have measurable exposure to SHS on any given day. Tobacco control strategies globally should consider the use of both the proportion of non-smoking adults with undetectable salivary cotinine and the GM as targets to encourage policies that achieve a smoke-free future. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cotinine; public policy; secondhand smoke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30158211      PMCID: PMC6914375          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  19 in total

1.  Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Methods to Assess Compliance With Smoke-Free Regulations: A Multi-Center Study in Six Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Angela Jackson-Morris; Kayleigh Bleymann; Elaine Lyall; Fouad Aslam; Tara Singh Bam; Ishrat Chowdhury; Elhadj Adam Daouda; Mariana Espinosa; Jonathan Romo; Rana J Singh; Sean Semple
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Handling results below the level of detection.

Authors:  T L Ogden
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-01-12

3.  Recent trends in children's exposure to second-hand smoke in England: cotinine evidence from the Health Survey for England.

Authors:  Martin J Jarvis; Colin Feyerabend
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Comparison of methods for analyzing left-censored occupational exposure data.

Authors:  Tran Huynh; Gurumurthy Ramachandran; Sudipto Banerjee; Joao Monteiro; Mark Stenzel; Dale P Sandler; Lawrence S Engel; Richard K Kwok; Aaron Blair; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-09-26

5.  Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries.

Authors:  Mattias Oberg; Maritta S Jaakkola; Alistair Woodward; Armando Peruga; Annette Prüss-Ustün
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  [Optimal cut-point of salivary cotinine concentration to discriminate smoking status in the adult population in Barcelona].

Authors:  Jose M Martínez-Sánchez; Marcela Fu; Carles Ariza; María J López; Esteve Saltó; José A Pascual; Anna Schiaffino; Josep M Borràs; Mercè Peris; Antonio Agudo; Manel Nebot; Esteve Fernández
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.139

7.  Smoke-free legislation and its impact on paediatric respiratory health.

Authors:  Timor Faber; Aziz Sheikh; Jasper V Been
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 16.671

8.  Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits.

Authors:  Jay H Lubin; Joanne S Colt; David Camann; Scott Davis; James R Cerhan; Richard K Severson; Leslie Bernstein; Patricia Hartge
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Overview of systematic reviews on the health-related effects of government tobacco control policies.

Authors:  Steven J Hoffman; Charlie Tan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Home Health and Community Care Workers' Occupational Exposure to Secondhand Smoke: A Rapid Literature Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Angus; Sean Semple
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.244

View more
  4 in total

1.  Population-level estimates of workplace exposure to secondhand smoke in Canada.

Authors:  Ela Rydz; Victoria Helen Arrandale; Cheryl Elizabeth Peters
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2019-09-05

2.  Tobacco Control Policy in Scotland: A Qualitative Study of Expert Views on Successes, Challenges and Future Actions.

Authors:  Yvonne Laird; Fiona Myers; Garth Reid; John McAteer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Occupational Exposure to Second-Hand Tobacco Smoke: Development of a Job Exposure Matrix.

Authors:  Ruaraidh Dobson; Evangelia Demou; Sean Semple
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.779

4.  Children's exposure to second-hand smoke 10 years on from smoke-free legislation in England: Cotinine data from the Health Survey for England 1998-2018.

Authors:  Harry Tattan-Birch; Martin J Jarvis
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-02-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.