Alice Fabbri1, Taylor J Holland2, Lisa A Bero2. 1. 1Centre of Research in Medical Pharmacology,University of Insubria,Varese,Italy. 2. 2Charles Perkins Centre and School of Pharmacy,Faculty of Medicine and Health,The University of Sydney,Camperdown,NSW 2006,Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify scientific publications that result from food industry-funded projects on human health and to characterize their research topics to assess the potential for bias in the research agenda. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis.Setting/SubjectsFood industry-supported projects related to human health were identified from food company websites; publications resulting from the food industry-sponsored projects were identified through a PubMed search. RESULTS: Of ten companies analysed, only two (Coca-Cola and the Mars Center for Cocoa Health Science) provided a list of research projects with sufficient detail for analysis. Among the 204 publications resulting from thirty-seven disclosed research projects, the most common topic was physical activity (40·7 %), while highly processed foods were analysed in 10·8 % of the publications. Twenty-two publications (10·8 %) focused on research integrity or research methods. CONCLUSIONS: Publications resulting from Coca-Cola- and Mars-sponsored research appear to skew the evidence towards solutions that favour industry interests by focusing on food components that can be manipulated and marketed by food companies. These food industry-funded publications can also distract from nutrition as a health issue by diverting public and policy attention to physical activity. Shaping the debate around scientific methods can be another strategy that corporations use for their benefit to raise doubts about the methods used in non-industry sponsored research.
OBJECTIVE: To identify scientific publications that result from food industry-funded projects on human health and to characterize their research topics to assess the potential for bias in the research agenda. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis.Setting/SubjectsFood industry-supported projects related to human health were identified from food company websites; publications resulting from the food industry-sponsored projects were identified through a PubMed search. RESULTS: Of ten companies analysed, only two (Coca-Cola and the Mars Center for Cocoa Health Science) provided a list of research projects with sufficient detail for analysis. Among the 204 publications resulting from thirty-seven disclosed research projects, the most common topic was physical activity (40·7 %), while highly processed foods were analysed in 10·8 % of the publications. Twenty-two publications (10·8 %) focused on research integrity or research methods. CONCLUSIONS: Publications resulting from Coca-Cola- and Mars-sponsored research appear to skew the evidence towards solutions that favour industry interests by focusing on food components that can be manipulated and marketed by food companies. These food industry-funded publications can also distract from nutrition as a health issue by diverting public and policy attention to physical activity. Shaping the debate around scientific methods can be another strategy that corporations use for their benefit to raise doubts about the methods used in non-industry sponsored research.
Authors: Jai K Das; Rehana A Salam; Salman Bin Mahmood; Anoosh Moin; Rohail Kumar; Kashif Mukhtar; Zohra S Lassi; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-12-18
Authors: Bradley C Johnston; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Malgorzata M Bala; Dena Zeraatkar; Montserrat Rabassa; Claudia Valli; Catherine Marshall; Regina El Dib; Robin W M Vernooij; Per O Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Clara Gómez-Donoso; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González; J Alfredo Martínez; Carmen Sayón-Orea; Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga; Maira Bes-Rastrollo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 3.240