Roberto Colangeli1, Hannah Jedrey1, Soyeon Kim1, Roy Connell1, Shuyi Ma1, Uma D Chippada Venkata1, Soumitesh Chakravorty1, Aditi Gupta1, Erin E Sizemore1, Lois Diem1, David R Sherman1, Alphonse Okwera1, Reynaldo Dietze1, W Henry Boom1, John L Johnson1, William R Mac Kenzie1, David Alland1. 1. From the Department of Medicine, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School (R. Colangeli, H.J., U.D.C.V., S.C., A.G., D.A.), and the Department of Biostatistics, Rutgers School of Public Health (S.K., R. Connell), Newark; the Center for Infectious Disease Research, Seattle (S.M., D.R.S.); the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (E.E.S., L.D., W.R.M.K.); Uganda-Case Western Reserve University Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda (A.O.); Nucleo de Doencas Infecciosas, Centro de Ciencias da Saude, Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil (R.D.); and the Tuberculosis Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland (W.H.B., J.L.J.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis have a relapse after 6 months of first-line therapy, as do approximately 20% of patients after 4 months of short-course therapy. We postulated that by analyzing pretreatment isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis obtained from patients who subsequently had a relapse or were cured, we could determine any correlations between the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a drug below the standard resistance breakpoint and the relapse risk after treatment. METHODS: Using data from the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium Study 22 (development cohort), we assessed relapse and cure isolates to determine the MIC values of isoniazid and rifampin that were below the standard resistance breakpoint (0.1 μg per milliliter for isoniazid and 1.0 μg per milliliter for rifampin). We combined this analysis with clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data to generate predictive relapse models, which we validated by analyzing data from the DMID 01-009 study (validation cohort). RESULTS: In the development cohort, the mean (±SD) MIC of isoniazid below the breakpoint was 0.0334±0.0085 μg per milliliter in the relapse group and 0.0286±0.0092 μg per milliliter in the cure group, which represented a higher value in the relapse group by a factor of 1.17 (P=0.02). The corresponding MIC values of rifampin were 0.0695±0.0276 and 0.0453±0.0223 μg per milliliter, respectively, which represented a higher value in the relapse group by a factor of 1.53 (P<0.001). Higher MIC values remained associated with relapse in a multivariable analysis that included other significant between-group differences. In an analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic curves of relapse based on these MIC values, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.779. In the development cohort, the AUC in a multivariable model that included MIC values was 0.875. In the validation cohort, the MIC values either alone or combined with other patient characteristics were also predictive of relapse, with AUC values of 0.964 and 0.929, respectively. The use of a model score for the MIC values of isoniazid and rifampin to achieve 75.0% sensitivity in cross-validation analysis predicted relapse with a specificity of 76.5% in the development cohort and a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 100% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In pretreatment isolates of M. tuberculosis with decrements of MIC values of isoniazid or rifampin below standard resistance breakpoints, higher MIC values were associated with a greater risk of relapse than lower MIC values. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis have a relapse after 6 months of first-line therapy, as do approximately 20% of patients after 4 months of short-course therapy. We postulated that by analyzing pretreatment isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis obtained from patients who subsequently had a relapse or were cured, we could determine any correlations between the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of a drug below the standard resistance breakpoint and the relapse risk after treatment. METHODS: Using data from the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium Study 22 (development cohort), we assessed relapse and cure isolates to determine the MIC values of isoniazid and rifampin that were below the standard resistance breakpoint (0.1 μg per milliliter for isoniazid and 1.0 μg per milliliter for rifampin). We combined this analysis with clinical, radiologic, and laboratory data to generate predictive relapse models, which we validated by analyzing data from the DMID 01-009 study (validation cohort). RESULTS: In the development cohort, the mean (±SD) MIC of isoniazid below the breakpoint was 0.0334±0.0085 μg per milliliter in the relapse group and 0.0286±0.0092 μg per milliliter in the cure group, which represented a higher value in the relapse group by a factor of 1.17 (P=0.02). The corresponding MIC values of rifampin were 0.0695±0.0276 and 0.0453±0.0223 μg per milliliter, respectively, which represented a higher value in the relapse group by a factor of 1.53 (P<0.001). Higher MIC values remained associated with relapse in a multivariable analysis that included other significant between-group differences. In an analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic curves of relapse based on these MIC values, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.779. In the development cohort, the AUC in a multivariable model that included MIC values was 0.875. In the validation cohort, the MIC values either alone or combined with other patient characteristics were also predictive of relapse, with AUC values of 0.964 and 0.929, respectively. The use of a model score for the MIC values of isoniazid and rifampin to achieve 75.0% sensitivity in cross-validation analysis predicted relapse with a specificity of 76.5% in the development cohort and a sensitivity of 70.0% and a specificity of 100% in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In pretreatment isolates of M. tuberculosis with decrements of MIC values of isoniazid or rifampin below standard resistance breakpoints, higher MIC values were associated with a greater risk of relapse than lower MIC values. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.).
Authors: Susan E Dorman; Payam Nahid; Ekaterina V Kurbatova; Stefan V Goldberg; Lorna Bozeman; William J Burman; Kwok-Chiu Chang; Michael Chen; Mark Cotton; Kelly E Dooley; Melissa Engle; Pei-Jean Feng; Courtney V Fletcher; Phan Ha; Charles M Heilig; John L Johnson; Erica Lessem; Beverly Metchock; Jose M Miro; Nguyen Viet Nhung; April C Pettit; Patrick P J Phillips; Anthony T Podany; Anne E Purfield; Kathleen Robergeau; Wadzanai Samaneka; Nigel A Scott; Erin Sizemore; Andrew Vernon; Marc Weiner; Susan Swindells; Richard E Chaisson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Robin J Svensson; Katarina Niward; Lina Davies Forsman; Judith Bruchfeld; Jakob Paues; Erik Eliasson; Thomas Schön; Ulrika S H Simonsson Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Nicholas C Poulton; Zachary A Azadian; Michael A DeJesus; Jeremy M Rock Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Jan Heyckendorf; Sophia B Georghiou; Nicole Frahm; Norbert Heinrich; Irina Kontsevaya; Maja Reimann; David Holtzman; Marjorie Imperial; Daniela M Cirillo; Stephen H Gillespie; Morten Ruhwald Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 50.129
Authors: Ove Øyås; Sonia Borrell; Andrej Trauner; Michael Zimmermann; Julia Feldmann; Thomas Liphardt; Sebastien Gagneux; Jörg Stelling; Uwe Sauer; Mattia Zampieri Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205