| Literature DB >> 30157168 |
Hua Zhou1, Shun-Cai Wang1, Jiu-Ming Ma1, La-Qing Yu1, Ji-Sheng Jing1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sperm-associated antigen 5 (SPAG5), a gene that encodes a mitotic spindle-associated protein, is closely related to tumor development and is involved in cell migration and proliferation. The objective of this research was to explore the clinical significance of SPAG5 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the relationship between SPAG5 expression and HCC prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty pairs of fresh-frozen HCC samples and samples from 95 HCC patients in a tissue microarray were subjected to quantitative real-time reverse-transcription (qRT)-PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, to investigate the relationship between the expression of SPAG5 and the clinicopathological features of HCC patients. RESULTS PCR data showed that the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression level of SPAG5 in HCC tissue specimens was higher than that in adjacent non-tumor tissue specimens (p<0.05). IHC analyses demonstrated that SPAG5 expression was significantly correlated with tumor grade (p=0.003), tumor number (p=0.009), vascular invasion (p=0.001), and TNM stage (p=0.001). Survival analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves showed that SPAG5 expression is an independent prognostic indicator for disease-free survival (p=0.017) and overall survival (p=0.016) in HCC patients. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that SPAG5 expression may be considered as an oncogenic biomarker and a novel predictor for HCC prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30157168 PMCID: PMC6126414 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.911434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Figure 1(A) SPAG5 expression is increased in fresh hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissue. In total, 20 pairs of RNA derived from HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues were subjected to qRT-PCR assays to detect SPAG5 mRNA expression. The relative 2−ΔΔCT values (Wilcoxon matched paired test) are shown. (B) Comparison of SPAG5 expression levels between HCC tissue samples and adjacent non-tumor tissue samples. Statistical analysis was performed with a Wilcoxon signed-rank nonparametric test. (C) The protein levels of SPAG5 in HCC (Ca) and adjacent nontumorous tissues (N) were determined by Western blot.
Figure 2SPAG5 expression is significantly up-regulated in HCC. IHC detection of SPAG5 expression in the paired HCC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. A1–A3, B1–B3 show high and low levels, respectively, of SPAG5 expression in HCC tissue. C1–C3, D1–D3 represents high and low levels, respectively, of SPAG5 expression in non-tumor tissue adjacent to tumor tissue. Middle and right panels contain higher-magnification images of the corresponding boxed areas in the left panels.
The relationship between SPAG5 expression and the clinicopathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
| Groups | No. | SPAG5 | χ2 | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| + | % | ||||
| Total | 95 | 54 | 56.8 | ||
|
| |||||
| Gender | 0.79 | 0.374 | |||
| Male | 85 | 47 | 55.3 | ||
| Female | 10 | 7 | 70.0 | ||
|
| |||||
| Age (years) | 2.00 | 0.157 | |||
| ≥60 | 23 | 16 | 69.6 | ||
| <60 | 72 | 38 | 52.8 | ||
|
| |||||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.37 | 0.542 | |||
| >5 | 31 | 19 | 61.3 | ||
| ≤5 | 64 | 35 | 54.7 | ||
|
| |||||
| Tumor encapsulation | 1.09 | 0.579 | |||
| None | 49 | 29 | 59.2 | ||
| Complete | 45 | 24 | 53.3 | ||
| Insufficient data | 1 | 1 | |||
|
| |||||
| Tumor number | 6.79 | 0.009 | |||
| Multiple | 12 | 11 | 91.2 | ||
| Solitary | 83 | 43 | 51.8 | ||
|
| |||||
| Hepatitis B virus infection | 1.54 | 0.464 | |||
| Yes | 74 | 40 | 54.1 | ||
| No | 20 | 13 | 65.0 | ||
| Insufficient data | 1 | 1 | |||
|
| |||||
| Liver cirrhosis | 2.92 | 0.232 | |||
| Yes | 85 | 50 | 58.8 | ||
| No | 9 | 3 | 33.3 | ||
| Insufficient data | 1 | 1 | |||
|
| |||||
| Pathological grade | 8.78 | 0.003 | |||
| Grade 1–2 | 46 | 19 | 41.3 | ||
| Grade 3 | 49 | 35 | 71.4 | ||
|
| |||||
| Vascular invasion | 21.1 | 0.001 | |||
| Present | 24 | 22 | 91.7 | ||
| Absent | 59 | 23 | 39.0 | ||
| Insufficient data | 12 | 9 | |||
|
| |||||
| TNM stage | 22.9 | 0.001 | |||
| Stage I | 60 | 23 | 38.3 | ||
| Stage II | 32 | 28 | 87.5 | ||
| Stage III | 3 | 3 | 100.0 | ||
p<0.05.
Univariate and multivariate analyses on the disease-free survival of 95 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| HR | p >|z| | 95% CI | HR | p >|z| | 95% CI | |
| SPAG5 expression | 4.37 | 0.001 | 1.798–10.606 | 3.34 | 0.017 | 1.236–9.036 |
| High versus low | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Gender | 3.58 | 0.209 | 0.489–26.199 | |||
| Male versus Female | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Age (years) | 1.28 | 0.533 | 0.593–2.746 | |||
| ≥60 versus <60 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Tumour size (cm) | 2.24 | 0.022 | 1.126–4.462 | 1.87 | 0.083 | 0.922–3.813 |
| >5 versus ≤5 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Tumor encapsulation | 1.76 | 0.118 | 0.866–3.586 | |||
| None versus complete | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Tumor number | 2.07 | 0.108 | 0.852–5.027 | |||
| Multiple versus solitary | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Hepatitis B virus infection | 1.05 | 0.905 | 0.456–2.426 | |||
| Yes versus no | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Liver cirrhosis | 1.69 | 0.474 | 0.403–7.050 | |||
| Yes versus no | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Pathological grade | 0.32 | 0.005 | 0.152–0.710 | 0.50 | 0.093 | 0.221–1.122 |
| Grade 1 and 2 versus Grade 3 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Vascular invasion | 2.04 | 0.061 | 0.966–4.327 | |||
| Present versus absent | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| TNM stage | 0.46 | 0.012 | 0.250–0.845 | 0.88 | 0.737 | 0.431–1.813 |
| Stage I versus Stage II versus Stage III | ||||||
p<0.05.
Univariate and multivariate analyses on the overall survival of 95 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| HR | p >|z| | 95% CI | HR | p >|z| | 95% CI | |
| SPAG5 expression | 4.29 | 0.001 | 1.773–10.373 | 3.31 | 0.016 | 1.245–8.748 |
| High versus low | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Gender | 1.97 | 0.351 | 0.473–8.246 | |||
| Male versus Female | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Age (years) | 1.15 | 0.712 | 0.537–2.484 | |||
| ≥60 versus <60 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Tumour size (cm) | 2.13 | 0.029 | 1.083–4.206 | 1.70 | 0.132 | 0.851–3.411 |
| >5 versus ≤5 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Tumor encapsulation | 1.96 | 0.063 | 0.964–3.990 | |||
| None versus complete | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Tumor number | 1.91 | 0.129 | 0.828–4.395 | |||
| Multiple versus solitary | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Hepatitis B virus infection | 1.11 | 0.806 | 0.475–2.603 | |||
| Yes versus no | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Liver cirrhosis | 1.73 | 0.452 | 0.414–7.235 | |||
| Yes versus no | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Pathological grade | 0.34 | 0.004 | 0.159–0.713 | 0.48 | 0.067 | 0.217–1.054 |
| Grade 1 and 2 versus Grade 3 | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Vascular invasion | 2.01 | 0.062 | 0.967–4.178 | |||
| Present versus absent | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| TNM stage | 0.50 | 0.014 | 0.283–0.869 | 0.92 | 0.805 | 0.477–1.775 |
| Stage I versus Stage II versus Stage III | ||||||
p<0.05.
Figure 3Disease-free and overall survival curves of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis according to protein SPAG5 expression. Patients with higher expression of SPAG5 were significantly associated with poorer disease-free (DFS) (A, P<0.001) and overall survival (OS) (B, P<0.001).