| Literature DB >> 30156402 |
James E McCutcheon1,2, Mitchell F Roitman2.
Abstract
In studies of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, rewards are often delivered to subjects in a manner that confounds several processes. For example, delivery of a sugar pellet to a rodent requires movement to collect the pellet and is associated with sensory stimuli such as the sight and sound of the pellet arrival. Thus, any neurochemical events occurring in proximity to the reward may be related to multiple coincident phenomena. We used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in rats to compare nucleus accumbens dopamine responses to two different modes of delivery: sucrose pellets, which require goal-directed action for their collection and are associated with sensory stimuli, and intraoral infusions of sucrose, which are passively received and not associated with external stimuli. We found that when rewards were unpredicted, both pellets and infusions evoked similar dopamine release. However, when rewards were predicted by distinct cues, greater dopamine release was evoked by pellet cues than infusion cues. Thus, dopamine responses to pellets, infusions as well as predictive cues suggest a nuanced role for dopamine in both reward seeking and reward evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: Rat; intraoral; pellet; sugar; voltammetry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30156402 PMCID: PMC8259316 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci ISSN: 1948-7193 Impact factor: 4.418