Literature DB >> 30156402

Mode of Sucrose Delivery Alters Reward-Related Phasic Dopamine Signals in Nucleus Accumbens.

James E McCutcheon1,2, Mitchell F Roitman2.   

Abstract

In studies of appetitive Pavlovian conditioning, rewards are often delivered to subjects in a manner that confounds several processes. For example, delivery of a sugar pellet to a rodent requires movement to collect the pellet and is associated with sensory stimuli such as the sight and sound of the pellet arrival. Thus, any neurochemical events occurring in proximity to the reward may be related to multiple coincident phenomena. We used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in rats to compare nucleus accumbens dopamine responses to two different modes of delivery: sucrose pellets, which require goal-directed action for their collection and are associated with sensory stimuli, and intraoral infusions of sucrose, which are passively received and not associated with external stimuli. We found that when rewards were unpredicted, both pellets and infusions evoked similar dopamine release. However, when rewards were predicted by distinct cues, greater dopamine release was evoked by pellet cues than infusion cues. Thus, dopamine responses to pellets, infusions as well as predictive cues suggest a nuanced role for dopamine in both reward seeking and reward evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rat; intraoral; pellet; sugar; voltammetry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30156402      PMCID: PMC8259316          DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci        ISSN: 1948-7193            Impact factor:   4.418


  40 in total

1.  Cocaine cues drive opposing context-dependent shifts in reward processing and emotional state.

Authors:  Robert A Wheeler; Brandon J Aragona; Katherine A Fuhrmann; Joshua L Jones; Jeremy J Day; Fabio Cacciapaglia; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2016-11

3.  Differential influence of associative and nonassociative learning mechanisms on the responsiveness of prefrontal and accumbal dopamine transmission to food stimuli in rats fed ad libitum.

Authors:  V Bassareo; G Di Chiara
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  What does dopamine mean?

Authors:  Joshua D Berke
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Real-time chemical responses in the nucleus accumbens differentiate rewarding and aversive stimuli.

Authors:  Mitchell F Roitman; Robert A Wheeler; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-02       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Hierarchical recruitment of phasic dopamine signaling in the striatum during the progression of cocaine use.

Authors:  Ingo Willuhn; Lauren M Burgeno; Barry J Everitt; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rapid dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens during contingent and noncontingent cocaine administration.

Authors:  Garret D Stuber; Mitchell F Roitman; Paul E M Phillips; Regina M Carelli; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Encoding of aversion by dopamine and the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  James E McCutcheon; Stephanie R Ebner; Amy L Loriaux; Mitchell F Roitman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Differential Dopamine Release Dynamics in the Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell Reveal Complementary Signals for Error Prediction and Incentive Motivation.

Authors:  Michael P Saddoris; Fabio Cacciapaglia; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Mesolimbic dopamine signals the value of work.

Authors:  Arif A Hamid; Jeffrey R Pettibone; Omar S Mabrouk; Vaughn L Hetrick; Robert Schmidt; Caitlin M Vander Weele; Robert T Kennedy; Brandon J Aragona; Joshua D Berke
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  1 in total

1.  Eating "junk food" has opposite effects on intrinsic excitability of nucleus accumbens core neurons in obesity-susceptible versus -resistant rats.

Authors:  Max F Oginsky; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.