Literature DB >> 3015637

Intra-individual comparison of captopril and enalapril in patients undergoing regular haemodialysis.

J Sennesael, D Verbeelen.   

Abstract

The acute and long-term efficacy, tolerance and safety of two orally active angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, captopril (C) and enalapril (E) were compared in patients on regular haemodialysis (RHD). C and E were successively administered for 6 months to 8 RHD patients with hypertension unresponsive to fluid withdrawal and conventional antihypertensive therapy. The fall in blood pressure after a starting dose of 25 mg C or 5 mg E was of the same magnitude. It was not correlated with the initial PRA levels, which were normal in all patients. The mean daily dose of ACE inhibitor was 45 +/- 28 mg during the C period and 19.4 +/- 17.6 mg at the end of the E period. Three patients required additional treatment, comprising beta-blockers and/or calcium antagonists. The individual daily dose of ACE inhibitor, the need for additional treatment and the antihypertensive response achieved were highly correlated during both study periods. During C administration 4 out of 8 patients presented a taste disturbance, which disappeared 2 weeks after substituting E for C. Serum electrolytes, liver enzymes, haemoglobin concentration and white cell and platelet counts remained unchanged throughout both study periods. It is concluded that RHD patients with hypertension are responsive to ACE inhibitors, C and E being equally effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3015637     DOI: 10.1007/bf00541524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  13 in total

1.  Hemodialysis-resistant hypertension: control with an orally active inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme.

Authors:  E D Vaughan; R M Carey; C R Ayers; M J Peach
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Plasma renin activity in end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  M Gutkin; G E Levinson; A S King; N Lasker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Antihypertensive effect of the new oral angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor "MK-421".

Authors:  H Gavras; J Biollaz; B Waeber; H R Brunner; I Gavras; R O Davies
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Captoril-associated agranulocytosis.

Authors:  F W Amann; F R Bühler; D Conen; F Brunner; R Ritz; B Speck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: past, present, and bright future.

Authors:  C R Edwards; P L Padfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Review of the overall experience of captopril in hypertension.

Authors:  E D Frohlich; R A Cooper; E J Lewis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1984-07

7.  Captopril and enalapril.

Authors:  I Gavras; H Gavras
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Innappropriate renin secretion unmasked by captopril (SQ 14 225) in hypertension of chronic renal failure.

Authors:  H R Brunner; B Waeber; J P Wauters; G Turin; D McKinstry; H Gavras
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Long-term hemodynamic response to captopril (SQ 14,225) in hypertensive hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  H Hirakata; K Iseki; K Onoyama; H Kumagai; S Fujimi; T Omae
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 0.975

10.  The clinical pharmacology of enalapril.

Authors:  H J Gomez; V J Cirillo; K H Jones
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1983-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of lisinopril, enalapril and enalaprilat in renal failure: effects of haemodialysis.

Authors:  J G Kelly; G D Doyle; M Carmody; D R Glover; W D Cooper
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.335

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.