Literature DB >> 30155977

Accuracy, limitations and cost efficiency of eDNA-based community survey in tropical frogs.

Miklós Bálint1,2, Carsten Nowak1,2, Orsolya Márton1,3, Steffen U Pauls1,2, Claudia Wittwer1, José Luis Aramayo4, Arne Schulze5, Thierry Chambert6, Berardino Cocchiararo1,2, Martin Jansen1.   

Abstract

Rapid environmental change in highly biodiverse tropical regions demands efficient biomonitoring programmes. While existing metrics of species diversity and community composition rely on encounter-based survey data, eDNA recently emerged as alternative approach. Costs and ecological value of eDNA-based methods have rarely been evaluated in tropical regions, where high species richness is accompanied by high functional diversity (e.g., the use of different microhabitats by different species and life stages). We first tested whether estimation of tropical frogs' community structure derived from eDNA data is compatible with expert field assessments. Next, we evaluated whether eDNA is a financially viable solution for biodiversity monitoring in tropical regions. We applied eDNA metabarcoding to investigate frog species occurrence in five ponds in the Chiquitano dry forest region in Bolivia and compared our data with a simultaneous visual and audio encounter survey (VAES). We found that taxon lists and community structure generated with eDNA and VAES correspond closely, and most deviations are attributable to different species' life histories. Cost efficiency of eDNA surveys was mostly influenced by the richness of local fauna and the number of surveyed sites: VAES may be less costly in low-diversity regions, but eDNA quickly becomes more cost-efficient in high-diversity regions with many sites sampled. The results highlight that eDNA is suitable for large-scale biodiversity surveys in high-diversity areas if life history is considered, and certain precautions in sampling, genetic analyses and data interpretation are taken. We anticipate that spatially extensive, standardized eDNA biodiversity surveys will quickly emerge in the future.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  Amphibians; community ecology; conservation; cost comparison; metabarcoding; tropical biodiversity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30155977     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  3 in total

1.  Shotgun metagenomics of soil invertebrate communities reflects taxonomy, biomass, and reference genome properties.

Authors:  Alexandra Schmidt; Clément Schneider; Peter Decker; Karin Hohberg; Jörg Römbke; Ricarda Lehmitz; Miklós Bálint
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 2.  Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation.

Authors:  Maciej Pabijan; Gemma Palomar; Bernardo Antunes; Weronika Antoł; Piotr Zieliński; Wiesław Babik
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Monitoring newt communities in urban area using eDNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Léo Charvoz; Laure Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil; Emanuela Reo; Jacques Thiébaud; Jan Pawlowski
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.