| Literature DB >> 30155909 |
Francesca Lecce1, Fergus Robertson2, Adam Rennie2, Anne-Marie Heuchan3, Paula Lister4, Sanjay Bhate5, Jo Bhattacharya6, Stefan Brew2, Lakshmi Kanagarajah2, Adam Kuczynski7, Mark J Peters2, Deborah Ridout8, Anne Schmitt2, Claire Toolis5, Faraneh Vargha-Khadem1,7, Vijeya Ganesan1,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Describe the course and outcomes in a UK national cohort of neonates with vein of Galen malformation identified before 28 days of life.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30155909 PMCID: PMC6221157 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Neurol ISSN: 0364-5134 Impact factor: 10.422
Figure 1Patients and recruitment.
Clinical and Demographic Characteristics
| Characteristic | All Survivors, n = 51 | Neurocognitive Testing Group, n = 34 | Nonsurvivors, n = 34 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antenatal diagnosis | 23 (45%) | 16 (47%) | 14 (41%) |
| Age at postnatal diagnosis, days, median (range) | 2 (1–28) | 2.5 (1–27) | 2 (1–5) |
| Gestation | |||
| Term | 39 (77%) | 26 (76%) | 30 |
| Preterm | 23 (23%) | 8 (24%) | 4 |
| Mode of delivery | |||
| Caesarean section | 30 (59%) | 20 (59%) | 12 (35%) |
| Vaginal | 21 (41%) | 14 (41%) | 22 (65%) |
| Presentation | |||
| Antenatal | 23 (45%) | 16 (47%) | 14 (41%) |
| Organ dysfunction | 28 (55%) | 18 (53%) | 20 (59%) |
| Bicêtre score at presentation | |||
| </=12 | 11/42 | 10/29 | 28/30 |
| >12 | 31/42 | 19/29 | 3/30 |
| Embolizations, n, median (range) | 3 (1–6) | 3 (1–4) | 1 (0–3) |
| Age at first embolization, days, median (range) | 5 (0–814) | 5 (0–814) | 2 (1–7) |
| Treatment complications, n | 20 (39%) | 11 (32%) | 14/19 (74%) |
| Age at testing, yr, median (range) | 5.2 (1–11) | ||
| Head circumference percentile at testing, median (range) | 56 (1–99) |
Figure 2(A–E) Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; A, D, E) and cerebral angiographic (B, C) images from a patient with choroidal vein of Galen malformation (VGM) diagnosed on third trimester antenatal ultrasound. She was delivered at term with no perinatal complications. (A) Brain MRI on day 1 of life demonstrated white matter volume loss with a large vein of Galen malformation; the prominent transmedullary veins likely represent significant venous hypertension. She was in severe high‐output cardiac failure necessitating ventilation, with rising inotrope requirement and early hepatic and renal failure. (B, C) She underwent embolization on day 2 of life; angiography demonstrated numerous choroidal feeders to the VGM malformation and poor cerebral perfusion. The cardiac failure came under control after this embolization. (D) However, having been neurologically stable for 2 weeks after this, she had a spontaneous right thalamic hemorrhage with intraventricular extension and secondary hydrocephalus. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was inserted. (E) Three further embolizations were performed in the subsequent 12 months, with final angiography at 14 months showing small residual arteriovenous shunt. (F) The most recent brain MRI at 4 years of age demonstrates marked white matter volume loss, with a lesser degree of cortical volume loss affecting the medial occipital lobes. No further embolizations are planned. Her clinical outcome was categorized as “poor” across all domains tested.
Brain Imaging Angiographic Features in Neurocognitive Testing Participants
| Feature | First Brain Imaging/Angiography | Most Recent Brain Imaging |
|---|---|---|
| Any brain injury | 13 (39%) | 28 (85%) |
| Cortical injury | 7 (21%) | 15 (45%) |
| White matter injury | 12 (36%) | 26 (79%) |
| Ventricular index mean (SD) | 0.36 (0.11) | |
| Angioarchitecture | ||
| Mural | 9 (27%) | |
| Choroidal | 24 (73%) | |
| Normal MCA branch flow rate, s, mean (SD) | 1.01 (0.43) | |
| Malformation closed at follow‐up | 21/33 (64%) |
MCA = middle cerebral artery; SD = standard deviation.
Results of Neurocognitive Testing
| Domain | Good | Poor | Not Assessable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurological outcome | 17 (50%) | 17 | |
| Cognitive development | 14 (41%) | 11 | 9 |
| Language development | 16 (47%) | 9 | 9 |
| Neuromotor function | 17 (50%) | 9 | 8 |
| Adaptive skills | 15 (44%) | 19 | |
| Emotional development | 21/31 | 10/31 | 3 |
| Executive functions | 7/15 | 8/15 | 19 |
Please refer to Supplementary Table 1 for definitions of “good” and “poor” for each category.
Univariate Logistic Regression Analyses
| Predictor | Good Cognitive Outcome, n = 14 | Poor Cognitive Outcome, n = 20 | OR Predicting Poor Outcome (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bicêtre score | ||||
| ≤12 | 1/12 | 9/17 | 12.3 (1.3–118) | 0.03 |
| >12 | 11/12 | 8/17 | ||
| Antenatal diagnosis | 7 (50%) | 11 (55%) | 1.2 (0.31–0.38) | 0.77 |
| Brain injury at presentation | 1 (7%) | 12 (53%) | 22.3 (2.4–208) | 0.007 |
| Cortical injury at presentation | 1 (7%) | 6 (31%) | 6.0 (0.63–57) | 0.12 |
| White matter injury at presentation | 1 (7%) | 11 (58%) | 17.9 (1.9–166) | 0.01 |
| Choroidal angioarchitecture c/w mural | 9 (%) | 15 (79%) | 2.1 (0.44–9.8) | 0.35 |
| Cortical steal, s, mean (SD) | 0.99 (0.37) | 1.04 (0.41) | 1.29 (0.25–6.7) | 0.77 |
Cortical steal was defined as the time taken in seconds from contrast first appearing in the arterial phase to it reaching the M3 branch of the middle cerebral artery.
Score < 12 compared with score ≥ 12.
c/w = compared with; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; SD = standard deviation.