Ana Saavedra1,2,3, Jorge Lima4,5, Lígia Castro4,6, Roberto Silva4,6, Sofia Macedo4,5, Elisabete Rodrigues7,8,4, Davide Carvalho7,8,4. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal. amgsaavedra@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. amgsaavedra@gmail.com. 3. i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. amgsaavedra@gmail.com. 4. i3S (Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. 5. Ipatimup (Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. 6. Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal. 7. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal. 8. Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas and paragangliomas/pheocromocytomas are rare endocrine tumours, which can be sporadic or familial. During many years their coexistence in the same individual was considered a coincidental finding. However, an association between these two entities was recently demonstrated, with the possible involvement of SDHx genes. CASE REPORT: We describe a 57-year-old female patient, who was under surveillance since 1997 for a malignant paraganglioma with vertebral bone metastasis, and harboured a germline frameshift mutation in exon 6 of SDHB gene [c.587-591DelC]. Seventeen years later, she was diagnosed with acromegaly and underwent transesphenoidal endoscopic resection of a somatotropinoma. Three months after surgery she started treatment with lanreotide for residual disease. Despite initial good response, she developed resistance to first generation of somatostatin analogues and treatment had to be switched to pegvisomant. In the immunohistochemical staining, the pituitary adenoma was positive for SDHA expression, while SDHB showed an heterogeneous staining pattern, with areas markedly positive and others with positive and negative cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide useful data for understanding the link between paragangliomas/pheocromocytomas and somatotropinomas. While we confirm the well-established link between SDHB mutations and paragangliomas/pheocromocytomas, particularly with malignant paragangliomas, the preservation-at least partially-of SDHB expression in the somatotropinoma tissue does not allow drawing definite conclusions about the involvement of the SDHB mutation in pituitary adenoma.
BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenomas and paragangliomas/pheocromocytomas are rare endocrine tumours, which can be sporadic or familial. During many years their coexistence in the same individual was considered a coincidental finding. However, an association between these two entities was recently demonstrated, with the possible involvement of SDHx genes. CASE REPORT: We describe a 57-year-old female patient, who was under surveillance since 1997 for a malignant paraganglioma with vertebral bone metastasis, and harboured a germline frameshift mutation in exon 6 of SDHB gene [c.587-591DelC]. Seventeen years later, she was diagnosed with acromegaly and underwent transesphenoidal endoscopic resection of a somatotropinoma. Three months after surgery she started treatment with lanreotide for residual disease. Despite initial good response, she developed resistance to first generation of somatostatin analogues and treatment had to be switched to pegvisomant. In the immunohistochemical staining, the pituitary adenoma was positive for SDHA expression, while SDHB showed an heterogeneous staining pattern, with areas markedly positive and others with positive and negative cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide useful data for understanding the link between paragangliomas/pheocromocytomas and somatotropinomas. While we confirm the well-established link between SDHB mutations and paragangliomas/pheocromocytomas, particularly with malignant paragangliomas, the preservation-at least partially-of SDHB expression in the somatotropinoma tissue does not allow drawing definite conclusions about the involvement of the SDHB mutation in pituitary adenoma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Paraganglioma; Resistance to Somatostatin Analogs; SDHB gene; Somatotropinoma
Authors: Paraskevi Xekouki; Eva Szarek; Petra Bullova; Alessio Giubellino; Martha Quezado; Spyridon A Mastroyannis; Panagiotis Mastorakos; Christopher A Wassif; Margarita Raygada; Nadia Rentia; Louis Dye; Antony Cougnoux; Deloris Koziol; Maria de La Luz Sierra; Charalampos Lyssikatos; Elena Belyavskaya; Carl Malchoff; Jessica Moline; Charis Eng; Louis James Maher; Karel Pacak; Maya Lodish; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Paraskevi Xekouki; Karel Pacak; Madson Almeida; Christopher A Wassif; Pierre Rustin; Maria Nesterova; Maria de la Luz Sierra; Joey Matro; Evan Ball; Monalisa Azevedo; Anelia Horvath; Charalampos Lyssikatos; Martha Quezado; Nicholas Patronas; Barbara Ferrando; Barbara Pasini; Aristides Lytras; George Tolis; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Lucie Evenepoel; Thomas G Papathomas; Niels Krol; Esther Korpershoek; Ronald R de Krijger; Alexandre Persu; Winand N M Dinjens Journal: Genet Med Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Paul Benjamin Loughrey; Federico Roncaroli; Estelle Healy; Philip Weir; Madhu Basetti; Ruth T Casey; Steven J Hunter; Márta Korbonits Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 5.900