| Literature DB >> 30155798 |
Sulalit Bandyopadhyay1, Birgitte H McDonagh2, Gurvinder Singh3, Karthik Raghunathan2, Axel Sandvig4,5, Ioanna Sandvig4,6, Jens-Petter Andreassen7, Wilhelm R Glomm2,8.
Abstract
With development in the synthesis of shape- and size-dependent gold (Au) nanostructures (NSs) and their applications in nanomedicine, one of the biggest challenges is to understand the interaction of these shapes with cancer cells. Herein, we study the interaction of Au NSs of five different shapes with glioblastoma-astrocytoma cells. Three different shapes (nanorods, tetrahexahedra, and bipyramids), possessing tunable optical properties, have been synthesized by a single-step seed-mediated growth approach employing binary surfactant mixtures of CTAB and a secondary surfactant. By the use of two-step seed-mediated approach, we obtained new NSs, named nanomakura (Makura is a Japanese word used for pillow) which is reported for the first time here. Spherical Au nanoparticles were prepared by the Turkevich method. To study NS-cell interactions, we functionalized the NSs using thiolated PEG followed by 11-Mercaptoundecanoic acid. The influence of shape and concentration of NSs on the cytotoxicity were assessed with a LIVE/DEAD assay in glioblastoma-astrocytoma cells. Furthermore, the time-dependent uptake of nanomakura was studied with TEM. Our results indicate that unlike the other shapes studied here, the nanomakura were taken up both via receptor-mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis. Thus, from our library of different NSs with similar surface functionality, the shape is found to be an important parameter for cellular uptake.Entities:
Keywords: Cytotoxicity; Drug delivery; Endocytosis; Glioblastoma-astrocytoma; LSPR; Nanomedicine; TEM
Year: 2018 PMID: 30155798 PMCID: PMC6113194 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2662-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Moles of CTAB and co-surfactant used for the synthesis of various shapes of Au NS
| Sample name | Co-surfactant | Moles of CTAB | Moles of co-surfactant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanorods (NRs) | OA | 3.3 × 10−6 | 6.3 × 10− 5 |
| Tetrahexahedra (THH) | OA | 3.3 × 10−6 | 9.4 × 10−4 |
| Bipyramids (BPs) | DDAB | 3.3 × 10−6 | 4.3 × 10−4 |
Fig. 1Schematics of synthesis of Au NSs. a Schematic showing Ag-assisted seeded growth mechanism used for the synthesis of different shapes of Au NSs. b Schematic showing a two-seeded growth mechanism for nanomakura
Fig. 2STEM images and UV-Vis spectra of Au NS s of different shapes. a BF-STEM image of Au NRs of dog-bone morphology and HRTEM image in inset shows the single crystalline nature of NRs. b BF-STEM image of elongated tetrahexahedral Au NSs (inset is SEM image). c SEM image of Au BPs (inset is SEM image of single BP). d TEM image of Au spherical particles (HRTEM image in inset shows the polycrystalline nature of Au particles). e BF-STEM image of Au NMs. f UV-vis spectra of Au NSs of different shapes
Size distribution analysis of Au NSs of different shapes. The average size of NSs was determined from TEM images counting over 100 NSs (Additional file 1: Figure S2, ESI†). The aspect ratio (AR) is calculated as the ratio of the long axis to the short axis
| Shape | Long axis (nm) | Short axis (nm) | AR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanorods (NRs) | 45 ± 8 | 18 ± 6 | 2.8 ± 0.7 |
| Tetrahexahedra (THH) | 180 ± 25 | 129 ± 27 | 1.4 ± 0.3 |
| Nano | 108 ± 15 | 71 ± 12 | 1.6 ± 0.3 |
| Bipyramids (BPs) | 644 ± 85 | 266 ± 19 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
| Spheres (SPs) | 15 ± 4 | 15 ± 4 | 1.0 ± 0.0 |
Fig. 3Morphology and growth of Au NM (nanomakura). a TEM images of NM taken at different angles. b BF-STEM images show the growth steps in the formation of NM type Au NSs. The solution taken from the growth solution at different time points was added directly to TEM grid without purification
Fig. 4Sizes and zeta potentials of Au NSs. a Variation of DLS sizes of the Au NSs after each stage of functionalization. b Variation of zeta potentials of Au NSs with each stage of functionalization. X-axis represents Au nanostructure of different shapes (NR nanorods, THH tetrahexahedra, NM nanomakura, BP bipyramid, SP spherical)
Fig. 5Effect of Au NSs on glioblastoma-astrocytoma cells. a Percentage cell death of glioblastoma-astrocytoma cells as a function of concentration of AuNSs. Incubation time was 24 h. Images b–m are acquired after incubation of makura-shaped AuNSs in glioblastoma-astrocytoma cells taken at several time points up to 24 h. b TEM shows an invagination of the cellular membrane (m membrane, scale bar = 1 μm), and c halogen and d fluorescence images show association of makura-shaped AuNSs at the cellular membrane. e Uptake of makura-shaped AuNSs were observed after 6 h (scale bar = 500 nm), f with uptake in intracellular vesicles (v vesicle, scale bar = 2 μm). g Staining of the nucleus (n) suggests that makura-shaped Au NSs were excluded from the nucleus. h TEM images taken after 12 h suggest uptake via macropinocytosis (scale bar = 500 nm), with i intravesicular location of makura-shaped AuNSs (vm vesicular membrane, scale bar = 500 nm). j Intracellular compartmentalization was also visible from the microscopy. Uptake of makura-shaped AuNSs continued at 24 h as seen in TEM images k (scale bar = 2 μm) and l (scale bar = 5 μm). m Detachment of glioblastoma-astrocytoma cells from the surface was observed, which most likely is an indication of cell death