Literature DB >> 30155570

Pediatric inguinal hernias, are they all the same? A proposed pediatric hernia classification and tailored treatment.

Sameh Shehata1, Sherif Shehata2, Herman L Wella3, Mohamed Abouheba4, Ahmed Elrouby1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To propose a new clinical classification for pediatric inguinal hernias modified from a similar classification system for adult inguinal hernia and to propose a tailored repair for each type. The impact of this approach on hernia recurrence will be assessed.
METHODS: This prospective and retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary teaching university hospitals in Egypt (Alexandria and Tanta University Children's Hospitals) from January 2013 to December 2014 on children below 12 years of age with indirect inguinal hernias who were divided into two groups: (a) prospective group I, classified according to our proposed pediatric hernia classification and tailored treatment (PHCTT) into types: pediatric Nyhus 1 (PNI) assigned for herniotomy alone, pediatric Nyhus II (PNII) assigned for herniotomy plus deep ring narrowing, and type pediatric Nyhus III (PNIII) assigned for herniotomy plus posterior wall repair. (b) Retrospective unclassified group II where all cases were assigned to herniotomy alone (open). Data about patient characteristics, assigned hernia type, operative findings, procedures done, and postoperative complications were documented and analyzed by comparing the outcomes of the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were included in this study with 401 hernias (30 bilateral); group I included of 217 patients, while group II included 154 patients. There was a male preponderance in group I (173/217 = 80%) and in group II (130/154 = 85%); the majority in both groups were less than 12 months of age, in group I (132/217 = 66%) and in group II (120/154 = 85%). The median age was 4 months and the median duration of symptoms was 2 months. For group I, PNII hernias formed the predominant cluster making 40% (94/235) followed by PNI hernias making 34.8% (82/235), while PNIII hernias were the least group being 25% (59/235) only. The mean follow-up period was 9.2 months ± 4.8 SD (and 9.1 months ± 2 SD in group II). The pooled recurrence rate was 1.9% (8/401) of the whole series, a weighted mean of the individual recurrence rates of 0% (0/235) of group I and 4.8% (8/166) of group II patients, all males. This difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric inguinal hernias are not the same and there is extreme variation in the presentation regarding the size of the defect. We proposed a nouvelle pediatric hernia classification modified from the original Nyhus classification for adult inguinal hernia with tailored surgical approach to each type (PHCTT). Applying this (PHCTT), it has the benefit of a significant reduction of recurrence rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nyhus classification; Pediatric inguinal hernias; Posterior wall repair; Recurrent hernia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30155570     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-018-1816-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  10 in total

1.  Preoperative Nyhus classification of inguinal hernias and type-related individual hernia repair. A case for diagnostic laparoscopy.

Authors:  P Renzulli; E Frei; M Schäfer; S Werlen; H Wegmüller; L Krähenbühl
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-10

Review 2.  Current management of hernias and hydroceles.

Authors:  Stanley T Lau; Yi-Horng Lee; Michael G Caty
Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Effect of subspecialty training and volume on outcome after pediatric inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Steven H Borenstein; Teresa To; Anne Wajja; Jacob C Langer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Hernia recurrence following inguinal hernia repair in children.

Authors:  Kathryn Taylor; Kristin A Sonderman; Lindsey L Wolf; Wei Jiang; Lindsey B Armstrong; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Brent R Weil; Robert L Ricca; Christopher B Weldon; Adil H Haider; Samuel E Rice-Townsend
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Ultrasonographic diagnosis for potential contralateral inguinal hernia in children.

Authors:  Akira Toki; Yasuhiro Watanabe; Kiyoshi Sasaki; Morimichi Tani; Kaoru Ogura; Zhong-Qiu Wang; Sun Wei
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 6.  Pediatric inguinal hernia: controversies and decision making.

Authors:  Chandra Shekhar Agrawal; Akshay Pratap
Journal:  Nepal Med Coll J       Date:  2007-09

7.  Laparoscopic herniotomy in children: prospective assessment of tertiary center experience in a developing country.

Authors:  S M K Shehata; A A El Attar; M A Attia; A M Hassan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Classification systems for groin hernias.

Authors:  Robert M Zollinger
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Pediatric hernias.

Authors:  Mary L Brandt
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Meshless treatment of open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study.

Authors:  Paulo Kassab; Ettore Ferrari Franciulli; Carolina Kassab Wroclawski; Elias Jirjoss Ilias; Osvaldo Antônio Prado Castro; Carlos Alberto Malheiros
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013 Apr-Jun
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open repair for inguinal hernia in children: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masayuki Nakashima; Kazuki Ide; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Laparoscopic iliopubic tract repair to treat recurrent pediatric inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Sung Ryul Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.