| Literature DB >> 30155176 |
Guoyong Song1,2, Gen Luo3, Juzo Oyamada1, Yi Luo3, Zhaomin Hou1,3.
Abstract
The efficient and selective ortho-alkylation of N,N-dimethyl anilines via C-H addition to alkenes was achieved for the first time using a cationic half-sandwich yttrium catalyst. This protocol constitutes a straightforward and atom-economical route for the synthesis of a new family of tertiary aniline derivatives with branched alkyl substituents, which are otherwise difficult to obtain. DFT calculation studies suggest that the interaction between the yttrium atom and the NMe2 group plays an important role and the intramolecular C-H activation through a σ-bond metathesis pathway is the rate-determining step, which is consistent with the experimental KIE observations.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 30155176 PMCID: PMC6020524 DOI: 10.1039/c6sc00833j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Catalytic C–H functionalization of N,N-dimethylaniline.
Chart 1Selected examples of half-sandwich rare-earth dialkyl complexes.
ortho C–H alkylation of N,N-dimethylaniline with 1-octene by half-sandwich rare earth catalysts
|
| ||||
| Entry | Ln (cat.) |
| Time (h) | Yield |
| 1 |
| 20 | 24 | 0 |
| 2 |
| 20 | 24 | 76 |
| 3 |
| 5 | 24 | 47 |
| 4 |
| 20 | 24 | 41 |
| 5 |
| 20 | 24 | 21 |
| 6 |
| 5 | 16 | 95 (93 |
Reaction conditions: 5a (0.4 mmol), 6a (5 or 20 equiv.), [Ln] (5 mol%), [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] (5 mol%), toluene (1.5 mL).
NMR yield.
Isolated yield.
Yttrium-catalysed ortho-C–H alkylation of tertiary anilines with alkenes
|
| |||||||||||
| Entry |
|
| Time | Product | Yield (%) | Entry |
|
| Time | Product | Yield (%) |
| 1 |
|
| 18 h |
| 94% | 10 |
|
| 24 h |
| 86% |
| 2 |
|
| 48 h |
| 86% | 11 |
|
| 48 h |
| 82% |
| 3 |
|
| 72 h |
| 75% | 12 |
|
| 48 h |
| 75% |
| 4 |
|
| 3 h |
| 99% | 13 |
|
| 36 h |
| 85% |
| 5 |
|
| 16 h |
| 92% | 14 |
|
| 24 h |
| 83% |
| 6 |
|
| 12 h |
| 99% | 15 |
|
| 16 h |
| 99% |
| 7 |
|
| 18 h |
| 93% | 16 |
|
| 24 h |
| 85% |
| 8 |
|
| 10 h |
| 94% | 17 |
|
| 24 h |
| 94% |
| 9 |
|
| 48 h |
| 82% | ||||||
Reaction conditions: 5 (0.4 mmol), 6 (2.0 mmol), catalyst 4 (5 mol%), [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] (5 mol%), toluene (1.5 mL), isolated yields.
Cy = cyclohexyl.
Norbornene 6f: 0.8 mmol.
Catalyst 4 (8 mol%), [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] (8 mol%).
Scheme 2Possible catalytic cycle with the calculated free energy in parenthesis (kcal mol–1). Cp′ = C5Me4SiMe3. The energy values are relative to A.
Fig. 1Optimized structure of C. Selected distances (Å) and angles (°): Y–N1 2.490; Y–C2 2.325; N1–Y–C2 61.18.
Fig. 2Optimized structure of the transition state TS2. Selected distances (Å) and angles (°): Y–N1 2.528; Y–C2 2.502; Y–C3 2.416; Y–C4 2.874; C4–C2 2.224; N1–Y–C2 58.18; C2–Y–C3 77.60.
Fig. 3Optimized structure of the transition state TS3. Selected distances (Å) and angles (°): Y–N2 2.542; Y–C6 2.478; Y–C3 2.519; Y–H 2.064; C6–H 1.420; N2–Y–C6 57.73; C6–Y–C3 70.95.