| Literature DB >> 30155068 |
Zhi-Ming Zhang1,2,3, Xiaopin Duan2, Shuang Yao2, Zhishu Wang1, Zekai Lin2, Yang-Guang Li1, La-Sheng Long3, En-Bo Wang1, Wenbin Lin2,3.
Abstract
We report the crystallization of homochiral polyoxometalate (POM) macroanions {Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 30155068 PMCID: PMC6013930 DOI: 10.1039/c5sc04408a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1Schematic showing the spontaneous resolution of enantiopure molecular capsules from achiral building blocks. W, light blue; Sb, cyan; Co, purple; N, blue; O, red; C, light grey; H, white.
Fig. 2Schematic view of the chiral recognition during crystallization of the racemic solution to the homochiral crystal with Co2+-mediated interactions (top), or to the racemic crystal (bottom).
Fig. 3The Δ- and Λ-enantiomers arranged in the racemic crystal. Hhmta and water molecules are omitted for clarity.
Fig. 4(a) The chiral Co2+ centre formed by coordinating three homochiral polyoxoanions via H-bonding interactions in Δ-2; (b) each microanion was connected to three [Co(H2O)6]2+ groups in this 3D structure, imparting chirality to the whole crystal. Counter Hhmta and water molecules are omitted for clarity.
Fig. 5(a) Calculated and experimental PXRD patterns of Δ-2 and Λ-2; the peak positions of a simulated and experimental PXRD pattern at 20 °C are in agreement with each other; (b) CD spectra for one chiral single crystal, powder samples, and one achiral single crystal in deionized water at the same concentration (1.49 mg mL–1); (c) and (d) CD spectra of chiral powder samples obtained by the first crystallization and second crystallization processes; (c) shows that the Δ-type POM was isolated in the first batch and the Λ-enantiomer was isolated in the second batch, and (d) shows that the Λ-type POM was isolated in the first batch and the Δ-enantiomer was isolated in the second batch.
IC50 values (μM) of POMs against A2780, A2780cisR, and OVCAR-3 cells after a 72-hour incubation, as determined by the MTS assay. Data are expressed as means ± S.D. (n = 3)
| A2780 cells | A2780cisR cells | OVCAR-3 cells | |
|
| 0.77 ± 0.01 | 4.35 ± 0.20 | 1.78 ± 0.07 |
| Δ- | 0.78 ± 0.01 | 4.51 ± 0.25 | 1.81 ± 0.01 |
| Λ- | 0.80 ± 0.03 | 4.42 ± 0.11 | 1.80 ± 0.08 |
| {Sb9W21} | 4.44 ± 0.13 | 29.02 ± 1.31 | 8.80 ± 0.18 |
Fig. 6(a) Uptake of Sb by A2780 and A2780cisR cells incubated with POMs for 4 hours (***P < 0.001); (b) quantitative analysis of apoptosis induced by 1 in A2780 and A2780cisR cells; (c) CLSM images showing cell apoptosis induced by 1 in A2780 and A2780cisR cells. The apoptotic bodies are labeled with black arrows. Scale bars: 20 μm; (d) flow cytometric analysis of the apoptotic and non-apoptotic populations of A2780 and A2780cisR cells treated with 1 by a TUNEL assay; (e) cell cycle analysis of A2780 and A2780cisR cells incubated with 1 for 24 hours.
Fig. 7(a) Decrease in the fluorescence of BSA in the presence of increasing amounts of POMs (***P < 0.001); (b) Stern–Völmer curves of the POMs–BSA systems; (c) time-resolved fluorescence decay traces of BSA titrated with 1, with a molar ratio of 1 to BSA of 0–10. “IRF” in the figure stands for Instrument Response Function; (d) binding of POMs to BSA at variable reaction times (***P < 0.001); (e) calorimetric data for the titration of BSA with 1. The binding isotherm (heat change vs. POM/BSA molar ratio) was obtained from the integration of raw data and was fitted to a “one-site” model.