Margot Riggi1,2,3,4, Karolina Niewola-Staszkowska1,4, Aurélien Roux5,6, Robbie Loewith7,8,9, Nicolas Chiaruttini2, Adai Colom2,4, Beata Kusmider1, Vincent Mercier2,4, Saeideh Soleimanpour4,10, Michael Stahl1, Stefan Matile4,10. 1. Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. iGE3 Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research Program Chemical Biology, Geneva, Switzerland. 5. Department of Biochemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. aurelien.roux@unige.ch. 6. Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research Program Chemical Biology, Geneva, Switzerland. aurelien.roux@unige.ch. 7. Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. robbie.loewith@unige.ch. 8. iGE3 Institute of Genetics and Genomics of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. robbie.loewith@unige.ch. 9. Swiss National Centre for Competence in Research Program Chemical Biology, Geneva, Switzerland. robbie.loewith@unige.ch. 10. Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
The target of rapamycin complex 2 (TORC2) plays a key role in maintaining the homeostasis of plasma membrane (PM) tension. TORC2 activation following increased PM tension involves redistribution of the Slm1 and 2 paralogues from PM invaginations known as eisosomes into membrane compartments containing TORC2. How Slm1/2 relocalization is triggered, and if/how this plays a role in TORC2 inactivation with decreased PM tension, is unknown. Using osmotic shocks and palmitoylcarnitine as orthogonal tools to manipulate PM tension, we demonstrate that decreased PM tension triggers spontaneous, energy-independent reorganization of pre-existing phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate into discrete invaginated membrane domains, which cluster and inactivate TORC2. These results demonstrate that increased and decreased membrane tension are sensed through different mechanisms, highlighting a role for membrane lipid phase separation in mechanotransduction.
The target of rapamycin complex 2 (TORC2) plays a key role in maintaining the homeostasis of plasma membrane (PM) tension. TORC2 activation following increased PM tension involves redistribution of the Slm1 and 2 paralogues from PM invaginations known as eisosomes into membrane compartments containing TORC2. How Slm1/2 relocalization is triggered, and if/how this plays a role in TORC2 inactivation with decreased PM tension, is unknown. Using osmotic shocks and palmitoylcarnitine as orthogonal tools to manipulate PM tension, we demonstrate that decreased PM tension triggers spontaneous, energy-independent reorganization of pre-existing phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate into discrete invaginated membrane domains, which cluster and inactivate TORC2. These results demonstrate that increased and decreased membrane tension are sensed through different mechanisms, highlighting a role for membrane lipid phase separation in mechanotransduction.
The plasma membrane (PM) is fundamental for cell survival. Not only does it form
a selectively permeable barrier and dynamic interface, but it also serves as a
scaffolding platform on which many fate-determining signaling decisions are taken.
Furthermore, PM tension, defined as the in-plane counteracting force to surface
expansion, plays an important role in transferring and integrating information in cells
and within tissues 1–3. Biological membranes are constantly affected by processes - for
example endo/exocytosis and cell migration - that impinge on their surface area,
composition, and the activity of attachment proteins. This adds complexity but also
provides the cell with multiple options for regulation of PM tension. Indeed, all cell
types react, albeit with different kinetics, to counteract perturbations in PM tension
suggesting that this is a tightly-controlled biophysical parameter 4–6.Despite its established importance, little is known about the mechanisms by which
PM tension is sensed and regulated. We recently identified the Target Of Rapamycin
Complex 2 (TORC2) as a regulator of cell surface area and PM tension homeostasis 7. Specifically, we found that manipulations that
presumably increase PM tension, including mechanical stretch of the PM, inhibition of
sphingolipid biosynthesis and hypo-osmotic shock, all trigger the redistribution of the
Slm proteins away from furrow-like invaginations organized by BAR protein assemblies
called eisosomes 8,9, into Membrane Compartments Containing TORC2 (MCTs) 10. The signal that triggers Slm protein relocalization remains
mysterious but membrane stretch has been reported to similarly induce mTORC2 signaling
in mammalian cells 11, implying that TORC2
activation by increased PM tension is conserved. Our model does not consider what
happens in the case of a decrease in PM tension, although one might assume that Slm1/2
would relocalize away from MCTs and back into eisosomes, inactivating TORC2. Here, we
describe a small-molecule modulator of TORC2 signaling, Palmitoylcarnitine (PalmC),
which acts primarily by reducing PM tension, monitored in live yeast cells with a
mechanosensitive probe. Using PalmC and hyper-osmotic shocks as orthogonal approaches to
diminish membrane tension, we found that neither treatment acutely affects Slm1
localization while both induce the phase separation of pre-existing
PtdIns(4,5)P2 into pronounced PM invaginations sequestering TORC2 and
leading to its inactivation.
Results
TORC2 senses hypo- and hyperosmotic stress through independent
mechanisms
Slm1 and 2 have previously been implicated in TORC2 signaling 12,13 and specifically in the perception of an increase in PM tension
upstream of TORC2 7. In exponentially
growing cells, ~60% of the Slm proteins localize to punctate PM protein
assemblies called eisosomes 8,14 with the remainder in MCTs. Upon
increased tension, the eisosomal pool relocalizes to MCTs and TORC2 signaling is
increased 7. To further explore the
molecular mechanisms regulating TORC2 activity, we applied osmotic shocks to
single cells expressing Slm1-GFP and Lsp1-mCherry, which marks eisosomes.
Changes in the colocalization between the two markers were compared with the
evolution of TORC2 activity, assessed by monitoring the phosphorylation status
of the direct TORC2 substrate T662 in Ypk1 15,16. Consistent
with our previous work 7, upon a
hypo-osmotic shock, Slm1-GFP moved out of eisosomes and TORC2 was activated with
similar kinetics (Fig. 1a-c). However,
although TORC2 activity was inhibited under a hyper-osmotic shock, both Slm1-GFP
and Lsp1-mCherry distributions remained unaffected (Fig. 1d-f). We noted that hypo-osmotic shock transiently
stimulated TORC2 activity in an amplitude-dependent manner, but that TORC2
activity went back to steady-state levels after only 5min, regardless of the
amplitude of the shock that was applied to the cells (Supplementary Fig. S1a and
S1c, left panel). Hyper-osmotic shock also caused a transient and
amplitude-dependent inhibition of TORC2 activity, but in this case, the return
of TORC2 activity to its basal level was slower and amplitude-dependent (Supplementary Fig. S1b and
S1c, right panel). Together, these results demonstrate that hypo- and
hyper-osmotic shocks are sensed upstream of TORC2 by distinct molecular
mechanisms.
Fig. 1
TORC2 senses hypo- and hyper-osmotic shocks through different
mechanisms.
(a, d) Top section confocal images of cells expressing Slm1-GFP and
Lsp1-mCherry following hypo- (a) or hyperosmotic shock
(d). The percentage of colocalization between markers is
indicated as the mean from n>30 cells [n=34 cells for hypo-osmotic shock and
n=38 for hyper-osmotic shock] pooled from three independent experiments. Scale
bars, 5μm. (b, e) Hypo- (b) and hyper-osmotic
shocks (e) respectively activate and inhibit TORC2 activity,
assessed by monitoring Ypk1 T662 phosphorylation. Presented blots are
representative of results obtained in three independent experiments, and all
unprocessed scans are shown in Supplementary Figure 7. (c, f) Correlation between
Slm1-GFP/eisosome colocalization and TORC2 activity following hypo-
(c) or hyperosmotic shock (f). Error bars
represent the SD of mean values of three independent experiments concerning
TORC2 activity, or the SD to the mean calculated from n>30 [n=34 cells for
hypo-osmotic shock and n=38 for hyper-osmotic shock] cells pooled from three
independent experiments in the case of the colocalization between Slm1 and
eisosomes.
Source data are included in Supplementary Table 3.
The HOG pathway 17,18 and the CWI pathway 19 constitute obvious candidates to couple
osmotic stress to TORC2. However, cells deficient in single or multiple
components in these pathways including: HOG pathway mutants
sln1Δpbs2Δ,
hkr1Δmsb2Δ and
sln1Δpbs2Δhkr1Δmsb2Δ;
a CWI pathway mutant wsc1Δmid2Δ;
and, a combined mutant
wsc1Δmid2Δhkr1Δmsb2Δ
(we were unable to recover a
wsc1Δmid2Δsln1Δpbs2Δ
quadruple mutant from our dissections) - all retained the ability to regulate
TORC2 activity upon osmotic shocks similarly to WT cells (Supplementary Fig. S1d).
Thus, the osmo-sensor(s) upstream of TORC2 must be independent of these
factors.
TORC2 signaling affects PM tension
We entertained the idea that PM tension per se might be
what is sensed upstream of TORC2. Hypo- and hyper-osmotic shocks are assumed to
increase and decrease PM tension by increasing and decreasing turgor pressure
respectively. To verify that osmotic shocks can be used to manipulate PM tension
in yeast, we used the recently-developed mechanosensitive “FliptR”
(Fluorescent LIPid Tension Reporter) probe 20 (Supplementary
Fig. S2a). This twisted push-pull fluorophore stably integrates into
the PM of cells where its planarization and polarization, and thus its
fluorescence properties, are sensitive to mechanical forces acting on the
membrane (Supplementary Fig.
S2b). Specifically, its fluorescence lifetime, which can be
determined by Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM), changes linearly
with PM tension in model membranes and in mammalian cells (unpublished data),
making it a valuable tool to monitor PM tension changes in
situ. Consistently, hypo- and hyper-osmotic shocks to yeast cells
respectively triggered an increase and a decrease in the FliptR lifetime,
proportional to the intensity of the shock (Fig.
2a). This confirms that such shocks can be used to manipulate PM
tension in yeast and that the FliptR probe can be used to qualitatively report
on changes in PM tension.
Fig. 2
TORC2 regulates PM tension in a homeostatic feedback loop manner.
(a) Osmotic shocks impact PM tension in a dose-dependent, linear
fashion. Cells were submitted to a range of osmotic shocks and the lifetime of
the FLipTR (Fluorescent LIPid Tension Reporter) probe was determined by
Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM). Note that different control
values for the hyper- and hypo-osmotic shocks are due to the different initial
growth conditions SC vs. SC + 1M sorbitol. Error bars represent the propagated
error of mean values for three independent experiments (with n=20 cells). Scale
bars, 5μm. (b) TORC2 inhibition results in increased PM
tension. TORC2 was inhibited by Rapamycin in TOR1-1
AVO3∆ cells 21, and the lifetime of the FLipTR probe was measured by
FLIM, and presented as the mean +/- SD (n=20 cells). This experiment was
repeated twice with similar results. (c) Elevated TORC2 signaling
lowers PM tension. The lifetime of the FLipTR probe was measured by FLIM in
cells expressing either a WT or a hyperactive version of
YPK2
16 (*** p<0.001, two-tailed
unpaired t-test, p=0.00014). Error bars represent the propagated error of mean
values for three independent experiments (with n=20 cells).
Source data are included in Supplementary Table 3.
We had previously proposed that TORC2 is part of a homeostatic feedback
loop that maintains PM tension 7. The
FliptR probe now allows us to test this model directly. We chose to inhibit
TORC2 using a recently described chemical-genetic approach 21 wherein TORC2, but not TORC1, is specifically inhibited
by rapamycin-FKBP12. Rapamycin-treatment of these cells caused a progressive
increase in the lifetime of the fluorophore (Fig.
2b), indicating an increase in PM tension. Conversely, enhanced TORC2
signaling in a strain expressing a hyperactive YPK2 allele
16 lowered PM tension, evidenced by a
reduced lifetime of the fluorophore (Fig.
2c). Together, these data add strong support to the model that TORC2
works in a functional feedback loop to maintain PM tensile homeostasis.
Palmitoylcarnitine (PalmC), a small-molecule tool to inhibit TORC2 and
manipulate PM tension
In parallel to these studies, we had launched a high-throughput screening
campaign to identify small molecules that specifically interfere with TOR
signaling in WT yeast cells (described in methods, Supplementary Fig. S3a-b, Supplementary Tables 4-5). This effort revealed
that Palmitoylcarnitine (PalmC, Supplementary Fig. S3c) is an inhibitor of TORC2, but not
TORC1, signaling. Specifically, our screen revealed that the toxicity of PalmC
is reduced in cells expressing hyperactive YPK2 (Supplementary Fig. S3d).
As this allele suppresses the lethality of TORC2 mutants, this result suggested
that PalmC is toxic specifically because it interferes with TORC2 signaling.
Consistently, treatment of cells with PalmC induced a fast, transient and
dose-dependent inhibition of TORC2 activity, but not TORC1 activity, assessed by
monitoring the TORC1-specific hydrophobic motif phosphorylation of Sch9 22 (Fig. 3a,
b). Inclusion of PalmC in in vitro kinase assays had
no effect on TORC2 kinase activity (Fig.
3c) suggesting that it targets a factor upstream of TORC2. Sensors of the
HOG and CWI pathways were again dispensable for the response of TORC2 to PalmC
(Supplementary Fig.
S3e), and Hog1 was not activated by PalmC treatment (Supplementary Fig. S3f),
suggesting that these pathways are not implicated in PalmC mode of action.
Fig. 3
Palmitoylcarnitine (PalmC) affects PM tension and TORC2 activity.
(a) PalmC inhibits TORC2, but not TORC1, in a time- and
dose-dependent manner in vivo. Phosphorylation of Ypk1
T662 and Sch9 T737 were monitored in PalmC-treated
cells. Presented blots are representative of results obtained in three
independent experiments. (b) Evolution of TORC2 activity after
varying PalmC doses. Error bars represent the SD of mean values of three
independent experiments. (c) PalmC does not inhibit TORC2
in vitro. Purified TORC2 was incubated with the indicated
inhibitors, radiolabeled γ-ATP, and a kinase-dead version of Ypk1. After
separation proteins were visualized by Sypro Ruby staining and incorporation of
radiolabeled ATP imaged with a phosphoimager. This experiment was repeated three
times with similar results. (d) PalmC induces a decrease in PM
tension. Cells incubated with the FLipTR probe were treated with PalmC and
imaged after 5 min by FLIM. Error bars represent the propagated error of mean
values for three independent experiments (n=20 cells). (e)
Simultaneous increase in PM tension negates PalmC effects on TORC2 activity.
Phosphorylation of Ypk1 T662 was monitored in
fps1Δ cells treated with PalmC, +/- a hypo-osmotic
shock, at the indicated time points. This experiment was repeated twice with
similar results. (f) PalmC incorporates into membranes. Time-lapse
following PalmC injection (20μM) in the vicinity of a Giant Unilamellar
Vesicle (GUV). Additional membrane is evidenced by appearance of an aspiration
tongue. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results.
All unprocessed scans of blots are shown in Supplementary Figure 7.
Source data are included in Supplementary Table 3.
Based on the amphiphilic properties of PalmC we hypothesized that its
effects could be due to modification of the biophysical properties of the PM,
particularly tension. Consistent with this idea, we observed a fast and dramatic
decrease in the lifetime of the FliptR probe after PalmC treatment (Fig. 3d), demonstrating that the drug induces
a decrease in PM tension. If this is the cause of TORC2 inhibition, we would
expect that hypo-osmotic shock would suppress this inhibition. To test this
prediction, we used fps1Δ cells that cannot efficiently
export the osmo-protectant glycerol and thus are slow to recover from
hypo-osmotic shock 23. Simultaneous
application of a hypo-osmotic shock to these cells largely negated PalmC-induced
TORC2 inactivation (Fig. 3e), while
hyper-osmotic shock displayed an additive effect with PalmC on TORC2 inhibition
(Supplementary Fig.
S3g). We hypothesize that PalmC decreases PM tension by directly
intercalating into the PM. Consistently, injecting PalmC into the buffer bathing
Giant Unilamellar Vesicles (GUVs) resulted in a rapid increase in surface area
of the GUV, evidenced by a fast elongation of the aspiration tongue into the
micropipette holding the GUV (Fig. 3f).
Blockage of exocytosis in sec18 cells 24, or endocytosis in Latrunculin A-treated
cells, did not affect PalmC-induced decrease in Ypk1 T662
phosphorylation (Supplementary
Fig. S3h, i), suggesting that PalmC does not impinge on TORC2
signaling through either of these processes.Based on these results, we decided to use PalmC as a tool, orthogonal to
hyper-osmotic shock, to investigate the molecular mechanisms of TORC2 activity
regulation upon decreases in PM tension.
A decrease in PM tension leads to the clustering of TORC2 to
PtdIns(4,5)P2-Enriched PM Domains
We first investigated the effect of a PalmC-induced decrease in PM
tension on TORC2 localization. As previously observed 10, TORC2, visualized through a GFP tag fused to its Avo3
subunit, localized to many small foci distributed along the PM. Following
PalmC-treatment these foci clustered into fewer, brighter puncta (Fig. 4a). We measured and plotted the size
distributions of these fluorescence maxima for untreated and PalmC-treated cells
and found that they had very little overlap. This allowed us to define a
fluorescent intensity threshold that separates small foci from larger puncta
(Supplementary Fig.
S4a). Puncta become noticeable after a few minutes of treatment,
crested in number after 30min, when they were present in 84% of the cells, and
persisted for up to 90min. The size, as well as the kinetics of the assembly and
disassembly of these structures was dose-dependent. Notably, this timing
correlated with both the kinetics of inhibition and reactivation of TORC2
activity and with a decrease and increase in PM tension as readout by the FliptR
probe (Fig. 4b). Thus, TORC2 clustering
into puncta is correlated with its inactivation.
Fig. 4
Decreased PM tension causes TORC2 to cluster into
PtdIns(4,5)P2-Enriched-Structures (PES).
(a, c) PalmC induces rapid TORC2 (Avo3-GFP, (a)) and
delayed Slm1-mCherry (c) clustering. The percentage of cells
displaying clusters is indicated as the mean of three independent experiments
including 50 cells. (b) Correlation of TORC2 clustering (dark
blue), Slm clustering (light blue), TORC2 activity (black), and PM tension
(red), following PalmC treatment. Clustering was assessed in three independent
experiments, each including 50 cells. TORC2 activity was monitored by Ypk1
T662 phosphorylation and the error bars represent the SD of three
independent experiments. PM tension was monitored through the FLipTR probe
lifetime and the error bars represent the propagated error of mean values of
three independent experiments (n=20 cells). (d) A decrease in PM
tension, but not direct inhibition of TORC2, triggers PtdIns(4,5)P2
redistribution. Time lapse of cells expressing the
GFP-2xPHPLCδ biosensor upon PalmC treatment, hyper-osmotic
shock, or Rapamycin treatment. (e) The membrane domains formed upon
decreased PM tension are enriched in PtdIns(4,5)P2. Cells expressing
the GFP-2xPHPLCδ biosensor and labelled with FM4-64 were mock
treated or treated with PalmC for 5 min. The last column presents the
ratiometric images of the two channels, constructed using ImageJ image
calculator tool. (f) An increase in PM tension induces fast
disassembly of the PES. Time lapse of cells expressing the
GFP-2xPHPLCδ biosensor and pretreated with PalmC for 15
min upon a 1M hypo-osmotic shock. TORC2 (g) and Slm1
(h) clusters co-localize with PES after PalmC treatment. The
percentage of colocalization between markers is the mean calculated from 10
cells pooled from two independent experiments, +/- SD.
All images are maximum projections of 0.5μm-spaced Z-planes of the cells,
and representative of results obtained in at least two independent experiments.
Scale bars, 5μm. Source data are included in Supplementary Table
3.
Decreasing PM tension with a hyper-osmotic shock mimicked the PalmC
effect and triggered TORC2 puncta formation, however direct inhibition of TORC2
activity by the ATP-competitive small molecule NVP-BHS34525 did not (Supplementary Fig. S4b). Together, these results suggest
that clustering into puncta is potentially the cause of TORC2 inactivation in
response to a decrease in PM tension, and not a consequence of its
inactivation.As with hyper-osmotic shock, the cellular distribution of Slm1-mCherry
remained largely unaffected during the first 20 min after PalmC treatment, but
these proteins then also began to cluster (Fig.
4c). We used the same threshold method to quantify Slm1 puncta (Supplementary Fig. S4c)
and observed that they crested after 60min of treatment. Interestingly, the
kinetics of Slm1 puncta formation tracks with the kinetics of TORC2 reactivation
(Fig. 4b). Inhibition of TORC2 results
in an increase in PM tension (Fig. 2b), and
we assume that once cells have restored a sufficient amount of tension in the
PM, the Slm proteins re-associate with TORC2 leading to its reactivation and the
dissociation of the TORC2 puncta. Consistent with this model, anchoring of Slm1
to eisosomes during PalmC recovery prevented TORC2 reactivation (Supplementary Fig. S4d,
e).TORC2 is recruited to the PM via the PH domain of its
Avo1 subunit which binds PtdIns(4,5)P2
10. Also, tor2 mutants
interact genetically with MSS4
26 which encodes the sole
PtdIns(4)P-5-kinase in yeast. Thus, we speculated that decreased PM tension
might affect the cellular distribution of this lipid, in turn affecting TORC2
activity. To investigate this, we examined the cellular distribution of
PtdIns(4,5)P2 using the biosensor GFP-2xPHPLCδ
27. In basal conditions,
PtdIns(4,5)P2 was distributed uniformly along the PM, in
accordance with previous studies 28. Upon
PalmC treatment or hyperosmotic shock, we observed a fast and striking
redistribution of GFP-2xPHPLCδ at the PM, whereas direct
inhibition of TORC2 did not trigger this lipid rearrangement (Fig. 4d). Staining cells expressing the
GFP-2xPHPLCδ biosensor with FM4-64 showed that the
clusters appearing upon decreased PM tension are truly enriched in
PtdIns(4,5)P2, as evidenced by the ratiometric comparison of the
images acquired in the two channels (Fig.
4e). These
“PtdIns(4,5)P2-Enriched-Structures” (PES) quickly
disassemble upon PM stretching induced by a hypo-osmotic shock (Fig. 4f), further supporting the idea that a
decreased PM tension constitutes the primary cause of their formation.PM buckling into large invaginations has been observed when cells
possess an excess of PM, for example, after hyper-osmotic shock 29. Interestingly, PalmC-treated, but not
control cells, presented large folded PM invaginations, enriched in
PtdIns(4,5)P2, when observed by electron microscopy after
anti-GFP immunogold labelling in cells expressing the PtdIns(4,5)P2
biosensor (Supplementary Fig.
S4f). Similar structures were previously observed in cells deleted
for the genes encoding inositol-5-phosphatases, and thus contain elevated levels
of PtdIns(4,5)P2
30. These structures are reminiscent of
failed endocytic events 31; however,
endocytosis requires an intact actin cytoskeleton in yeast 31, and pretreatment with Latrunculin A (LatA), an actin
depolymerizing agent, did not prevent PES formation (Supplementary Fig. S3g).
Additionally, LatA treatment did not affect PES dissolution, implying that
endocytosis is not essential to resolve these structures (Supplementary Fig.
S4h).As TORC2 clusters and PES appear after PalmC treatment with similar
kinetics we asked whether or not these structures are related; indeed, we found
that Avo3-GFP and mCherry-2xPHPLCδ puncta colocalized (Fig. 4g, 60.3+/-14.6% colocalization).
Together, these results suggest that the relocalization and clustering of TORC2
into PES is part of a common mechanism to transiently inhibit TORC2 activity
upon a decrease of PM tension. At later time points, Slm1-mCherry puncta also
colocalized with PES (Fig. 4h, 65.4+/-10.4%
colocalization), likely to reactivate TORC2 as described above.
PtdIns(4,5)P2 is crucial for TORC2 clustering and inhibition upon
a decrease in PM tension
We postulated that the interaction between the PH domain of Avo1 and
PtdIns(4,5)P2 constitutes the driving mechanism responsible for
TORC2 clustering. Both localization and activity of TORC2 are lost upon the
shift of thermosensitive mss4-103 cells to non-permissive
temperature (Supplementary
Fig. S5a-b). To prevent the detachment of TORC2 from the PM upon loss
of PtdIns(4,5)P2 we replaced the PH domain of Avo1 with a CAAX motif,
to enable the PtdIns(4,5)P2-independent, yet fully functional, PM
recruitment of TORC2 10. The localization
of TORC2CAAX in mss4-103 cells was assessed at the
permissive (30°C) and the non-permissive (37°C) temperatures,
before and after PalmC treatment. At the permissive temperature,
TORC2CAAX behaved similarly to TORC2WT – it
localized to small foci before PalmC treatment and to large puncta after
treatment, but it failed to cluster at the non-permissive temperature (Fig. 5a). Growth at 37°C per
se did not alter the PalmC-induced relocalization of TORC2. These
observations demonstrate that PtdIns(4,5)P2 is necessary for TORC2
clustering upon PalmC treatment in a manner that does not solely involve the PH
domain of Avo1.
Fig. 5
PtdIns(4,5)P2 is crucial for TORC2 inhibition and cell survival
upon an acute decrease in PM tension.
(a) PtdIns(4,5)P2 is required for TORC2 clustering upon
decrease PM tension. Avo3-GFP localization upon PalmC treatment, in
WT and mss4-103 TORC2 cells
grown at the indicated temperatures for 90min. (b)
PtdIns(4,5)P2 is required for PM remodeling upon decreased PM
tension. FM4-64 PM labeling in WT and mss4-103
TORC2 cells expressing
GFP-2xPHPLCδ and grown at the indicated temperatures for
90min, upon PalmC treatment. (c) PtdIns(4,5)P2 is
required for TORC2 inhibition upon decrease PM tension. Evolution of Ypk1
T662 phosphorylation upon PalmC or Wortmannin (Wort, 2μM,
5min) treatment, in WT and mss4-103
TORC2 cells grown at the indicated temperatures
for 90min. Unprocessed scans of blots are shown in Supplementary Figure 7.
Error bars represent the SD of mean values of three independent experiments, and
source data are included in Supplementary Table 3. (d) TORC2 inhibition is
necessary for efficient survival of an acute decrease in PM tension.
WT or mss4-103 TORC2CAAX cells
were grown at the indicated temperature for 90min before being treated with
10μM PalmC for 60min or 2M Sorbitol for 15min. Serial dilutions were then
spotted onto YPD plates and cell regrowth monitored 24h later.
All images are maximum projections of 0.5μm-spaced Z-planes of the cells,
and representative of results obtained in at least three independent
experiments. Scale bars, 5μm.
We next queried whether the remodeling of the PM itself upon PalmC
treatment was also PtdIns(4,5)P2-dependent. The absence of
PtdIns(4,5)P2 in mss4-103 TORC2
cells grown at 37°C precluded the use of the
GFP-2×PHPLCδ biosensor so, for these experiments,
changes in the PM structure were visualized using FM4-64. At the permissive
temperature, in both WT and mss4-103
TORC2 cells, FM4-64 puncta appeared upon PalmC
treatment and colocalized with PES (Fig.
5b). FM4-64 clusters were not observed in mss4-103
TORC2 cells upon PalmC treatment at the
restrictive temperature (Fig. 5b),
demonstrating that PtdIns(4,5)P2 is required for the remodeling of
the PM that follows a decrease in PM tension. Furthermore, although the basal
activity of the TORC2CAAX variant is relatively low in
mss4-103 cells (Supplementary Fig. S5c), this remaining activity is largely
resistant to PalmC treatment when cells are incubated at the non-permissive
temperature (Fig. 5c). This indicates that
PtdIns(4,5)P2-mediated TORC2 clustering is necessary for TORC2
inhibition. Yeast cells growing in the wild must respond to stresses that affect
plasma membrane tension such as osmotic shock and we wondered if TORC2
inactivation contributes to the ability of cells to tolerate such stresses. To
test this, we queried if depletion of PtdIns(4,5)P2 would affect the
ability of cells to survive and/or recover from stresses that trigger acute loss
of PM tension. Indeed, inactivation of mss4-103, but not the
temperature shift per se, impaired regrowth following transient
PalmC exposure or hyper-osmotic shock (Fig.
5d and Supplementary Fig. S5d). These observations indicate that
PtdIns(4,5)P2 is a crucial intermediate in the sensing of
decreased PM tension upstream of TORC2, and that inhibition of TORC2 signaling
is an essential response of cells experiencing a sudden decrease in PM
tension.
A decrease in PM tension triggers PtdIns(4,5)P2 phase
separation
Quantification of GFP-2xPHPLCδ signal after PalmC
treatment shows PtdIns(4,5)P2 clustering into distinct puncta, but no
global increase in PtdIns(4,5)P2 (Supplementary Fig. S6a and
b). Mss4 co-localizes to PalmC-induced PES, cresting at 15 min and
disappearing by 90 min (Fig. 6a),
suggesting that decreased PM tension might act through Mss4 to create PES.
Fig. 6
PtdIns(4,5)P2 redistributes through ATP-independent phase
separation upon decreased PM tension
(a) Mss4-GFP relocalizes to PES upon decreased PM tension. Images
are maximum projections of 0.5μm-spaced Z-planes of the cells.
(b) Mss4 activity is not required for PES assembly. Time-lapse
images of WT or
inp51Δinp52Δ cells
expressing the GFP-2xPHPLCδ biosensor upon ATP depletion
followed by 10μM PalmC treatment. Images are maximum projections of
0.5μm-spaced Z-planes of the cells. (c) Decreased PM tension
induces a lipid phase separation within the PM. PM pixel distribution and
modeled distribution after Laurdan GP (Generalized Polarization) imaging of
untreated and PalmC-treated cells (n=25 cells pooled from two independent
experiments, >2250 pixels, n=2583 and 2251 pixels for the mock and PalmC
conditions respectively). Representative color-coded GP images of the equatorial
plan of the cells, constructed with ImageJ image calculator tool, are shown.
Source data are included in Supplementary Table 3. (d) PM domains of higher GP
correspond to PES. Cells expressing the mCherry-2xPHPLCδ
biosensor were stained with the Laurdan dye after 5min of 10μM PalmC
treatment, and a representative colour-coded GP image of the equatorial plan of
the cells, constructed with ImageJ image calculator tool, is shown.
(e) ATP depletion prevents the formation of puncta of higher GP
upon PalmC treatment in WT, but not in
inp51Δinp52Δ cells.
Representative colour-coded GP images of maximum projections of
0.5μm-spaced Z-planes of the cells, constructed with ImageJ image
calculator tool, are shown. (f) Increased and decreased PM tension
are sensed through different mechanisms by TORC2. Increased PM tension induces
the translocation of Slm proteins (orange) from eisosomes to MCTs where they
activate TORC2 (purple). Decreased PM tension triggers a spontaneous,
energy-independent PtdIns(4,5)P2 phase separation into invaginated
membrane domains (PES) which cluster and inactivate TORC2 (white).
All images are representative of results obtained in at least two independent
experiments. Scale bars, 5μm.
To challenge this hypothesis, we tested whether PES would still form in
ATP-depleted cells, in which PtdIns(4,5)P2 synthesis cannot occur.
Upon ATP-depletion, PtdIns(4,5)P2 is rapidly turned over through the
action of several phosphatases (Inp51, 52 and 53) and the
GFP-2xPHPLCδ biosensor disassociates from the PM within a
minute (Fig. 6b, top panel). Deletion of
INP51 and INP52 prevents this loss of
PtdIns(4,5)P2. Remarkably, even after ATP depletion, PalmC
treatment still rapidly induces the formation of PES in inp51Δ
inp52Δ cells (Fig. 6b,
bottom panel). These results demonstrate that decreased PM tension triggers PES
formation via a redistribution of pre-existing
PtdIns(4,5)P2 and not via de novo synthesis.
PtdIns(4,5)P2 present within PES is not selectively shielded from
phosphatases since the GFP-2XPHPLCδ probe is also rapidly
relocalized from PES to the cytosol upon ATP depletion in WT,
but not inp51Δ inp52Δ cells (Supplementary Fig. S6c).
From these results we conclude that Mss4 relocalization ensures that
PtdIns(4,5)P2 levels remain high in PES while PM tension is low
and that ATP depletion per se does not trigger PES
disassembly.Finally, we wondered whether the formation of PES could be due to a
lipid phase separation within the PM. To assess this, we used the lipophilic dye
Laurdan and subsequent calculation of the Generalized Polarization (GP) as a
readout for lipid order 32,33. Laurdan partitions equally into
liquid-disordered (Ld) or liquid-ordered (Lo) membranes and is not associated to
specific lipids, so GP values reflect the overall organization of the PM34, being high in Lo phases, and low in Ld
phases. The pixel histogram obtained from the GP images of untreated PM followed
a normal distribution, meaning that the PM globally displays a homogeneous
organization (Fig. 6c). After PalmC
treatment, we observed the appearance of a second population of pixels
displaying higher GP (Fig. 6c), indicating
the presence of a more ordered phase. Using cells expressing the mCherry variant
of the PtdIns(4,5)P2 biosensor, we confirmed that the domains of high
GP correspond to PES (Fig. 6d). Moreover,
we observed the appearance of high-GP puncta upon PalmC treatment in
ATP-depleted inp51Δinp52Δ, but not
WT, cells (Fig. 6e).
This confirms the necessity of PtdIns(4,5)P2 in the phase separation
process. Endocytic BAR domain proteins such as Rvs161 or its dimerization
partner Rvs167, could conceivably drive lipid phase separation. However, this
seems unlikely as Rvs167-GFP does not redistribute to PES upon decreased PM
tension (Supplementary Fig.
S6d). Collectively, our results support the model that PES formation
is the result of a spontaneous phase separation of PtdIns(4,5)P2.
Discussion
We propose that the respective inactivation and activation of TORC2 upon
decrease and increase in membrane tension are regulated through fundamentally
different mechanisms (Fig. 6f). Sensing of
increased PM tension involves the translocation of Slm proteins
from eisosomes to MCTs where they activate TORC2 7. Here, we demonstrated that decreased PM tension
triggers a spontaneous, energy-independent PtdIns(4,5)P2 phase separation
into discrete invaginated membrane domains which cluster and inactivate TORC2.
Recently, we reported that clustering of TORC1 upon glucose starvation is both
necessary and sufficient for its inactivation 35. Cryo-electron microscopy revealed that TORC1 clusters are actually a
giant helix of regularly assembled TORC1 dimers, organized such that the kinase
active site is physically occluded and thus not accessible to substrate. Given the
structural similarities between TORC1 and TORC2 36, we anticipate that the TORC2 clusters that we report here will
represent an analogous, higher-order TORC2 assembly responsible for its
inactivation.This result presents the interesting possibility that
PtdIns(4,5)P2 phase separation is the primary molecular sensor of
decreased PM tension. PtdIns(4,5)P2 patches are well suited to pattern
the localized events required for the regulation of a given signaling pathway, by
recruiting and activating a range of effector proteins. For example, PES-like
structures have also been observed in higher eukaryotes, where they function to
organize CD44-Ezrin interactions linking the PM to the cytoskeletal actin network
37, and to promote exocytosis by
concentrating SNARE proteins 38,39. Interestingly, local
PtdIns(3,4)P2 production upon growth factor deprivation was very
recently implicated in the inhibition of mTORC1 residing on lysosomes and late
endosomes 40. Collectively, these
observations suggest that protein sorting by lipid phase-separation could constitute
a currently underappreciated mechanism of signal transduction regulation in general
and regulation of TOR signaling in particular.
Methods
Yeast strains and plasmids
All strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables 1
and 2. Yeast strains
were generated either by homologous recombination of PCR-generated fragments as
previously described or by crossing, sporulation and subsequent dissection of
the spores. All primers used for the generation of the strains are listed in
Supplementary Table
6. Strains were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. Cloning and
site-directed mutagenesis were performed following standard procedures and
plasmids were verified by sequencing. All tagged proteins are functional and
expressed from their endogenous promoter.
Yeast culture
Yeast cells were grown according to standard procedures at 30°C
or 37°C as indicated in either YPD or SC medium lacking appropriate amino
acids required for plasmid selection to an OD600 of 0.6–0.8.
For the hypo-osmotic shocks, cells were grown to OD600= 0.8 in SC
containing 1 M of sorbitol, which was then diluted to the indicated sorbitol
concentrations by addition of pre-warmed SC medium. For the hyper-osmotic
shocks, cells were grown to OD600=0.6 in SC media, before adding the
appropriate volume of SC+2M sorbitol to reach the desired final sorbitol
concentration.
Chemicals and drugs
Rapamycin (LC Laboratories) was dissolved in 90% ethanol, 10%
Tween® 20 at 1mg/mL and used at a final concentration of 200nM.
Wortmannin (LC Laboratories) was dissolved in DMSO at 5mg/mL and used at a final
concentration of 2μM. Cycloheximide (Sigma) was dissolved in
H2O at 10mg/mL and used at 2μg/mL. NVP-BHS345 (Novartis)
was dissolved in DMSO at 10mM and used at a final concentration of 10μM.
Palmitoylcarnitine was dissolved in DMSO at 10mM and used at 10μM, unless
otherwise stated. The FLipTR probe, dissolved in DMSO 20, was used at a final concentration of 2ng/mL. The
Laurdan dye (6-Dodecanoyl-2-dimethylaminonaphthalene) was maintained as a 2.5mM
stock solution in DMF and used at 2.5μM. The FM™4-64 dye
((N-(3-Triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4-(Diethylamino) Phenyl) Hexatrienyl)
Pyridinium Dibromide, Thermofisher) was dissolved at 10mM in DMSO and used at a
final concentration of 10μM. For ATP depletion, cells were treated for
10min with a combination of 3mM NaN3 and 50mM 2-deoxy-D-glucose 41.
High-throughput drug screen
Both TORC1 and TORC2 perform essential functions which can be
genetically bypassed upon introduction of mutations that constitutively activate
downstream effector pathways 42.
Specifically, the lethality caused by loss of TORC1 activity can be suppressed
by simultaneous expression of a constitutively active variant of the Sch9 kinase
and deletion of TIP41 which encodes a protein phosphatase
regulator 43; lethality associated with
the loss of TORC2 activity is suppressed by expression of a hyperactive variant
of the Ypk2 kinase 16. To identify small
molecules that potentially interfere with TORC1 and/or TORC2 signaling we
screened 89,850 molecules from the Rockefeller HTSRC compound library 44 and sought out compounds that are more
toxic to WT than to bypass cells (Supplementary Fig. S3a-b,
Supplementary Table
4). A total of 89,850 unique compounds from The Rockefeller
University High Throughput and Spectroscopy Resource Center library were
screened. They were part of the following commercially available libraries:
ChemDiv (San Diego, CA), Cerep (Poitiers, France), ChemBridge (San Diego, CA),
AMRI (Albany, NY), Greenpharma (Orléans, France), BioFocus (Charles
River, Wilmington, MA), Prestwick Chemical (San Diego, CA) and LOPAC (Sigma,
Carlsbad, CA). Compounds stocks were stored in a total of 281 384-well
polypropylene plates at a final concentration of 5mM in DMSO at
-30°C.10μL of Agar Yeast Extract-Peptone-Dextrose (YPD) broth was
preloaded into each well of clear-bottomed 384-well assay plates using a Thermo
Multidrop Combi dispenser (Thermo Scientific). Compounds stock plates were
thawed at room temperature, and 0.1μL of compound was added to the wells
of the assay plates using a Perkin Elmer Janus equipped with a Perkin Elmer
Nanohead. The overnight, saturated cultures of WT (TB50 MATa
leu2-3,112 ura3-52 rme1 trp1 his3) and of the TORC1/2
bypass strain (MS119; TB50a pRS304::SCH9) were diluted to
OD600=0.125 in YPD. 40μL of both diluted cultures were
dispensed into the wells of parallel assay plates to achieve a final
concentration of compounds of 10μM and a final concentration of DMSO of
0.2%. Plates were subsequently incubated at 30°C in a humidified bag for
24h without agitation. 2 μg/mL of Cycloheximide, which inhibits the
growth of both strains, was kept in 8 wells in column 24 and used as a positive
control. 0.2% DMSO was kept in the column 23 and used as a negative control.
Rapamycin, which inhibits the growth of the WT but not the
double bypass (BY) strain, was used at a final concentration of 1μg/mL as
an internal control for selectivity in the 8 remaining wells of column 24.The absorbance at 600nm was measured for both strains using a plate
reader (Perkin Elmer Envision) before (T0) and after 24h incubation
(T24). The normalized percentage inhibition of yeast growth (NPI)
was calculated for each sample as follows: where x is the sample (OD600
T24 – OD600 T0),
μ- is the negative control mean and μ+
is the positive control mean.55 compounds (listed in Supplementary Table 5) with NPIWT –
NPIBY > 20% or NPIWT – NPIBY
< -50% were selected for retesting in concentration response experiments
to determine half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50). These
compounds were serially diluted by half for a total of 10 dilutions to achieve
an assay concentration ranging from 30μM to 0.06μM. PalmC, which
initially displayed toxicity specifically to the bypass strain, was amongst
these 55 compounds (highlighted in yellow in Supplementary Table
5).
Spot Assays
Strains were grown overnight at 30°C, diluted to
OD600=0.1, grown to exponential phase and diluted to
OD600=0.3. 3μL of 1/5 serial dilutions were spotted on plates
containing the appropriate treatment. The plates were photographed after
incubation at 30°C for 2-3 days.
Antibodies
The following antibodies were used in this study: goat anti-Ypk1 1:1000
(Cell Signaling, not produced anymore); mouse anti-phospho-Ypk1-T662
1:500 7; rabbit
anti-phospho-Sch9-T737 1:250 45; rabbit anti-Sch9 1:10000 21; rabbit anti-phospho-p38 T180/T182 1:1000
(Cell Signaling 9211S); rabbit anti-Hog1 1:1000 (Santa Cruz Technology sc-9079);
and the appropriate infrared dye-coupled secondary antibodies used at a dilution
of 1:10000 (Alexa Fluor 680-conjugated anti-mouse 926-68072 and anti-rabbit
926-68073 secondary antibodies from LI-COR Biosciences and IRDye® 800
conjugated anti-goat 605-732-125 secondary antibody from Rockland
Bioconcept).
TCA Protein Extraction & Phosphoproteins Immunodetection
6% TCA was directly added to exponentially growing yeast cultures and
cells were incubated for 5 min on ice before collection. Extracts were prepared
as described previously 43 and proteins
were resolved on a 7.5% SDS gel and blotted on a nitrocellulose membrane.
Immunodetection was performed using the indicated antibodies and the
Odyssey® IR imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences).
In vitro kinase assay
GST-Ypk1K376A and TORC2 were purified from yeast as
previously described 21. TORC2 was
pre-incubated with the appropriate concentrations of 1μL of drug/vehicle
for 10min at 25°C in a thermomixer rotating at 800rpm. The kinase
reactions were started by the addition of 5μg of Ypk1K376A,
300μM ATP, 4.2mM MgCl2 and 100μCi gamma-32P
ATP. They were incubated for 10min at 30°C in a thermomixer rotating at
800rpm, and terminated with the addition of 6x SDS-PAGE sample buffer and a
10min incubation at 65°C. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels,
stained with Sypro Ruby Protein gel stain and analyzed using a BioRad Molecular
Imager.
Fluorescence Microscopy
Cells were grown at 30°C in SC medium to OD600 = 0.6,
mounted on coverslips coated with Concanavalin A (Sigma) and immediately imaged
with a spinning-disc microscope assembled by 3i (Intelligent Imaging Innovation,
Denver, USA) and Nikon (Eclipse C1, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) using a 100 x objective
(NA=1.3, Nikon). Laurdan dye integrated into cell membranes was excited along
the 405 nm laser line and emission read at 430~470 nm (representing the
liquid ordered phase) or 490~550 nm (representing the liquid disordered
phase). For microfluidics experiments, a Concanavalin A-coated coverslip was
bonded to the bottom surface of a flow chamber (sticky-slide VI 0.4, Ibidi,
Munich, Germany) with one entry connected to a syringe pump (Aladdin, World
Precision Instrument, Sarasota, USA) and the other left open for sequential
introduction of different solutions. The flow chamber was primed with SC medium
prior to the loading of cells. Loaded cells were washed several times with SC
medium, and then subjected to the appropriate treatments. Images were taken as
either single focal planes or captured as Z-series to generate 2D maximum
intensity projections. For FLIM (Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy),
cells were grown overnight in SC medium to OD600 = 0.05 to 0.1,
concentrated by spinning and incubated for 1min with 2ng/mL of the FLipTR probe
before imaging using the SymPhoTime 64 software.
Electron Microscopy
Fixed cells (2,5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer 0.1M for 2h) were
further treated with 2% osmium tetroxide and immersed in a solution of uranyl
acetate 0.25% overnight. The pellets were dehydrated in increasing
concentrations of ethanol followed by pure propylene oxide, then embedded in
Epon resin. Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and
observed in a Tecnai 20 EM.
Image processing and quantification
For quantification of the colocalization of fluorescent markers, (Fig. 1a, 1d, 4g, 4h), z-stacks of cells were recorded and deconvoluted. The same
threshold was used for each channel in all tested conditions to create binary
images. Binary masks were overlaid to an RGB image and yellow (colocalizing
marker; >/= 4 pixels) and green (non-colocalizing; >/= 4 pixels)
foci were counted using the ImageJ plug-in Cell Counter (National Institutes of
Health, http://www.macbiophotonics.ca/imagej/). The percentage of foci
containing colocalizing markers was calculated with Excel (Microsoft).Ratiometric images (Fig. 4e) were
constructed using the image calculator tool from ImageJ.Quantification of protein foci intensities (Fig. S4a and S4c) was
performed using ImageJ.For FLIM analysis (Fig. 2, 3d, 4b),
we used the SymPhoTime 64 software to fit the data according to a 2-exponential
reconvolution model and calculate the lifetime of the FlipTR probe.To study the evolution of PtdIns(4,5)P2 concentration (Fig. S6a), single focal
plane images of the cell middle were taken, a 2px-wide line was drawn around the
cortex of cells using ImageJ, and fluorescence intensity values were plotted for
each channel. For quantification of cellular total
GFP-2xPHPLCδ fluorescence intensity (Fig. S6b),
0.5μm-spaced Z-planes series of cells were taken under identical laser
power and exposure time. The cytoplasmic mean fluorescence intensity was
subtracted from the total cellular fluorescence intensity (both measured using
ImageJ) for each focal plane before adding the obtained values.Generalized Polarization (GP) values (Fig.
6c) were calculated for each pixel of a yeast PM according to the
following equation: where I440 and I490
represents the intensity of pixels in the areas of interest in the image
acquired in the ordered and disordered spectral channels, respectively.
Statistics and reproducibility
The samples sizes and statistical tests were selected based on previous
studies with similar methodologies. All experiments were repeated at least three
times, giving similar results. The results of independent experiments are
presented as mean values; error bars represent the SD, or the propagated error
when the value of each experiment was itself calculated as a mean of individual
cells. Statistical significance was tested using the two-tailed Student’s
t-test.
Authors: Tobias C Walther; Jason H Brickner; Pablo S Aguilar; Sebastián Bernales; Carlos Pantoja; Peter Walter Journal: Nature Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alba Diz-Muñoz; Kevin Thurley; Sana Chintamen; Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu; Daniel A Fletcher; Orion D Weiner Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Alexander Wallroth; Philipp A Koch; Andrea L Marat; Eberhard Krause; Volker Haucke Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Carla E Lanze; Rafael M Gandra; Jenna E Foderaro; Kara A Swenson; Lois M Douglas; James B Konopka Journal: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 11.056
Authors: Huiwang Zhan; Sayak Bhattacharya; Huaqing Cai; Pablo A Iglesias; Chuan-Hsiang Huang; Peter N Devreotes Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Charles A Coomer; Irene Carlon-Andres; Maro Iliopoulou; Michael L Dustin; Ewoud B Compeer; Alex A Compton; Sergi Padilla-Parra Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 6.823