| Literature DB >> 30154487 |
Guixiang Zhou1,2, Jiabao Zhang2, Xiuwen Qiu3, Feng Wei4, Xiaofeng Xu4.
Abstract
Atmospheric nitrogen (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30154487 PMCID: PMC6113256 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30666-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Soil properties (0–10 cm depth) in the Alnus cremastogyne (AC) and Liquidambar formosana (LF) plantations.
| Plantation | Treatment | Organic matter (%) | TN (g kg−1) | TP (mg kg−1) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| N0 | 11.43 ± 0.21a | 0.57 ± 0.06c | 1.17 ± 0.06c | 6.17 ± 0.06a |
| N1 | 10.57 ± 0.31a | 1.67 ± 0.32b | 1.53 ± 0.06b | 6.00 ± 0.10a | |
| N2 | 10.97 ± 0.55a | 2.57 ± 0.06a | 2.13 ± 0.15a | 6.10 ± 0.00a | |
|
| N0 | 9.23 ± 0.55ab | 0.43 ± 0.06b | 1.37 ± 0.06b | 6.67 ± 0.15a |
| N1 | 9.77 ± 0.15a | 0.67 ± 0.25b | 1.83 ± 0.15a | 6.63 ± 0.06a | |
| N2 | 8.67 ± 0.32b | 1.87 ± 0.21a | 1.27 ± 0.21b | 6.43 ± 0.12a |
Soil samples were collected before the beginning of the litter decomposition experiment in August 2015. Organic matter measurements were based on the C concentration and a conversion factor (1.724). TN, soil total N; TP, soil total P. Values are presented as means ± SE, n = 3. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments in each plantation (ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD, P < 0.05). N0: without N addition, N1: 30 kg N ha yr.−1, N2: 60 kg N ha yr.−1 AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Initial litter chemistry of the AC and LF litters.
| Litter type | Total C (mg g−1) | Total N (mg g−1) | Total P (mg g−1) | K (mg g−1) | Cellulose (mg g−1) | Lignin (mg g−1) | C:N | Lignin:N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 456.30 ± 3.56 | 9.40 ± 0.44 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 1.64 ± 0.05 | 5.05 ± 0.04 | 3.82 ± 0.01 | 48.60 ± 1.92 | 40.74 ± 2.01 |
|
| 418.70 ± 4.51 | 6.17 ± 0.45 | 0.32 ± 0.1 | 2.04 ± 0.07 | 3.83 ± 0.03 | 3.71 ± 0.02 | 71.50 ± 2.97 | 60.33 ± 4.57 |
|
| *** | ** | ** | *** | *** | *** |
Values are presented as means ± SE, n = 3. Significance: P indicates the differences between the AC and LF litters, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 1Changes in litter mass loss and nutrient concentrations (% of initial mass) over time for litter decomposition in AC (A,C,E) and LF (B,D,F) plantations under different N treatments: N0 (control), N1 (30 kg N ha−1 yr−1), and N2 (60 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Values are means ± SE. *Indicates significance differences between the control and the N addition treatments at P < 0.05. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 2Activities of three cellulose-degrading enzymes (β-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase, and endocellulase) at different sampling times over a 24 month decomposition period in the N-deposition and control plots. Values are means ± SE. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 3Activities of two lignin-degrading enzymes (phenol oxidase and peroxidase) at different sampling times over a 24 month decomposition period in the N-deposition and control plots. Values are means ± SE. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 4Metabolic activities of the microbial communities and their relationship to litter decomposition when estimated using the Biolog EcoPlates analysis process (Average well color development (AWCD) unit 72 h) at 6 months (A) and 24 months (B) after N addition. Average well color development data are means ± SE from three replicates. Bars that do not have the same letter (shown above each bar) are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 5Community-level physiological profiles (CLPP) of AC litter (A,B) and LF litter (C,D) after they had been allowed to decompose for 6 months (A and C, respectively) and 24 months (B and D, respectively). *Indicates significance differences between the control and N addition treatments at P < 0.05. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 6Redundancy analysis (RDA) relating mass remaining to litter quality and microbial activity. AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.
Figure 7Soil microbial biomass carbon (A) and nitrogen (B) in the AC and LF plantations. Soil samples (0–10 cm depth) were collected in August 2017. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments in each plantation (ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD, P < 0.05). AC: Alnus cremastogyne, LF: Liquidambar formosana.