| Literature DB >> 30154217 |
Dagmar Schmitz1, Dominik Groß1, Charlotte Frierson1, Gerrit A Schubert2, Henna Schulze-Steinen3, Alexander Kersten4.
Abstract
Clinical ethics support (CES) services are experiencing a phase of flourishing and of growing recognition. At the same time, however, the expectations regarding the acceptance and the integration of traditional CES services into clinical processes are not met. Ethics rounds as an additional instrument or as an alternative to traditional clinical ethics support strategies might have the potential to address both deficits. By implementing ethics rounds, we were able to better address the needs of the clinical sections and to develop a more comprehensive account of ethics quality in our hospital, which covers the level of decisions and actions, and also the level of systems and processes and aspects of ethical leadership. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: clinical ethics; ethics committees/consultation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30154217 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903