Alexia M Torke1,2,3,4, Susan E Hickman3,4,5, Bernard Hammes6, Steven R Counsell1,2, Lev Inger1, James E Slaven7, Dawn Butler2. 1. 1 Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 2. 2 Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. 3 Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. 4 Research in Palliative and End of Life Communication and Training (RESPECT) Center, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 5. 5 School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 6. 6 Respecting Choices, La Crosse, WI, USA. 7. 7 Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: : The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form is an advance care planning tool designed for seriously ill patients. The discussions needed for high-quality POLST decision-making are time intensive and often do not occur in the outpatient setting. OBJECTIVE: : We conducted a single-arm feasibility study of POLST facilitation by nonphysicians using Respecting Choices Last Steps, a standardized, structured approach to facilitation of POLST conversations. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS:: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older enrolled in a complex care management program in a Midwestern urban hospital. MEASUREMENTS:: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability by determining the proportion of eligible patients who enrolled and completed the study, by adherence to the Respecting Choices protocol, and by responses to qualitative and quantitative survey items about the intervention. RESULTS: : We enrolled 18 (58.1%) of 31 eligible patients, with a mean age of 77.8 years (standard deviation: 6.95); 12 were African American. The POLST facilitation was delivered to all 18; 10 (55.6%) completed POLST forms. Direct observation of intervention delivery using a checklist found 85% of the required elements were performed by facilitators. We completed 6- to 8-week follow-up interviews in 16 of 18 patients (88.9%). We found 87.5% of decision makers agreed or strongly agreed that "Talking about the (POLST) form helped me think about what I really want." CONCLUSIONS: : The POLST facilitation can be successfully delivered to frail older adults in a complex care management setting, with high fidelity to protocol. Further research is needed to demonstrate the effects of this approach on decision quality and other patient-reported outcomes.
BACKGROUND: : The Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form is an advance care planning tool designed for seriously ill patients. The discussions needed for high-quality POLST decision-making are time intensive and often do not occur in the outpatient setting. OBJECTIVE: : We conducted a single-arm feasibility study of POLST facilitation by nonphysicians using Respecting Choices Last Steps, a standardized, structured approach to facilitation of POLST conversations. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS:: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older enrolled in a complex care management program in a Midwestern urban hospital. MEASUREMENTS:: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability by determining the proportion of eligible patients who enrolled and completed the study, by adherence to the Respecting Choices protocol, and by responses to qualitative and quantitative survey items about the intervention. RESULTS: : We enrolled 18 (58.1%) of 31 eligible patients, with a mean age of 77.8 years (standard deviation: 6.95); 12 were African American. The POLST facilitation was delivered to all 18; 10 (55.6%) completed POLST forms. Direct observation of intervention delivery using a checklist found 85% of the required elements were performed by facilitators. We completed 6- to 8-week follow-up interviews in 16 of 18 patients (88.9%). We found 87.5% of decision makers agreed or strongly agreed that "Talking about the (POLST) form helped me think about what I really want." CONCLUSIONS: : The POLST facilitation can be successfully delivered to frail older adults in a complex care management setting, with high fidelity to protocol. Further research is needed to demonstrate the effects of this approach on decision quality and other patient-reported outcomes.