Literature DB >> 30153646

Health impact assessment of PM2.5-related mitigation scenarios using local risk coefficient estimates in 9 Japanese cities.

Xerxes Seposo1, Masahide Kondo2, Kayo Ueda3, Yasushi Honda4, Takehiro Michikawa5, Shin Yamazaki5, Hiroshi Nitta5.   

Abstract

Previous studies have highlighted the negative effects of PM2.5 on mortality, expressed in terms of attributable deaths and life years lost. However, there are very few studies assessing the health impacts of air pollution in terms of economic burden/benefits. This study assessed the health impact of two hypothetical interventions among sex- and age-specific risk populations using a robust risk estimation and economic valuation process. We utilized the sex- and age-stratified daily all-cause mortality together with the daily PM2.5 of the 9 Japanese cities from 2002 to 2008 in estimating the relative risks. The estimated risks were then utilized for the economic valuation of co-benefits/burden with respect to the two hypothetical PM2.5-related mitigation scenarios, in comparison to status quo, namely: i) decrease to Japanese standards, and ii) decrease to WHO standards. Impact of these interventions on health were assessed using the following HIA metrics: attributable mortality, attributable years life lost, and environmental health impact. A 10-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 would increase the risk by 0.52% (95% CI: -0.91% to 1.99%) for all-cause mortality, with varying risk estimates per subgroup. High economic burdens were estimated at status quo, with particularly distinct burden difference for age-specific mortality; 0.40 trillion yen (0-64 y.o.) and 1.50 trillion yen (>64 y.o.). If stricter standards, relative to status quo, were to be enforced, i.e. WHO standard, there is a potential to yield economic benefits in the same risk population; 0.26 trillion yen (0-64 y.o.) and 0.98 trillion yen (>64 y.o.). We did not observe any substantial difference with the burden and benefit related to sex-specific mortality. Using the estimated local risk coefficients complemented with the valuation of the risks, policymaking entities will have the opportunity to operate their own HIA to assess the relevant air pollution-related health impacts.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attributable mortality; Benefit; Burden; Health impact assessment; Particulate matter; Years life lost

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30153646     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  3 in total

1.  Effect of global atmospheric aerosol emission change on PM2.5-related health impacts.

Authors:  Xerxes Seposo; Kayo Ueda; Sang Seo Park; Kengo Sudo; Toshihiko Takemura; Teruyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  Methods for Evaluating Environmental Health Impacts at Different Stages of the Policy Process in Cities.

Authors:  Jaime Benavides; Sebastian T Rowland; Jenni A Shearston; Yanelli Nunez; Darby W Jack; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 3.  A scoping review on the health effects of smoke haze from vegetation and peatland fires in Southeast Asia: Issues with study approaches and interpretation.

Authors:  Vera Ling Hui Phung; Attica Uttajug; Kayo Ueda; Nina Yulianti; Mohd Talib Latif; Daisuke Naito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.