Vasilios Pergialiotis1, Maria Oikonomou2, Vasileia Damaskou3, Dimitrios Kalantzis4, Charalampos Chrelias2, Argirios E Tsantes4, Ioannis Panayiotides3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. Electronic address: pergialiotis@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. 3. Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece. 4. Laboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, Attikon Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to present new data concerning the diagnostic efficacy of neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte (PLR) ratios in detecting endometrial carcinoma and to summarize the existing knowledge by accumulating all the available data in the existing literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with evidence of endometrial pathology (vaginal bleeding or increased endometrial thickness) that undergone dilatation and curettage. For the meta-analysis we used the Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant articles in the field. RESULTS: In our retrospective series we identified 106 women with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and 72 controls. PLR and NLR values were comparable among the two groups (p>.05). Eleven studies were included in the present systematic review with a total of 4168 patients. The meta-analysis included 1013 patients. PLR values were not significantly different among the two groups. On the other hand, NLR was significantly raised among patients with endometrial carcinoma (MD 0.73, 95% CI 0.01, 1.45). CONCLUSION: The findings of our meta-analysis support that NLR values are significantly elevated in patients with endometrial cancer compared to controls. Moreover, there seem to be evidence to support that both PLR and NLR values increase in patients with advanced stage disease, including positive lymph nodes, lymphovascular space involvement and distant metastases. Future studies are needed in this field to reach firm conclusions and these should specifically target patients with advanced stage disease.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study is to present new data concerning the diagnostic efficacy of neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte (PLR) ratios in detecting endometrial carcinoma and to summarize the existing knowledge by accumulating all the available data in the existing literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with evidence of endometrial pathology (vaginal bleeding or increased endometrial thickness) that undergone dilatation and curettage. For the meta-analysis we used the Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant articles in the field. RESULTS: In our retrospective series we identified 106 women with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and 72 controls. PLR and NLR values were comparable among the two groups (p>.05). Eleven studies were included in the present systematic review with a total of 4168 patients. The meta-analysis included 1013 patients. PLR values were not significantly different among the two groups. On the other hand, NLR was significantly raised among patients with endometrial carcinoma (MD 0.73, 95% CI 0.01, 1.45). CONCLUSION: The findings of our meta-analysis support that NLR values are significantly elevated in patients with endometrial cancer compared to controls. Moreover, there seem to be evidence to support that both PLR and NLR values increase in patients with advanced stage disease, including positive lymph nodes, lymphovascular space involvement and distant metastases. Future studies are needed in this field to reach firm conclusions and these should specifically target patients with advanced stage disease.
Authors: Katarzyna Holub; Fabio Busato; Sebastien Gouy; Roger Sun; Patricia Pautier; Catherine Genestie; Philippe Morice; Alexandra Leary; Eric Deutsch; Christine Haie-Meder; Albert Biete; Cyrus Chargari Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Michal Mleko; Kazimierz Pitynski; Elzbieta Pluta; Aleksandra Czerw; Katarzyna Sygit; Beata Karakiewicz; Tomasz Banas Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.989