Literature DB >> 30153503

Phylogeny and evolutionary history of Pinaceae updated by transcriptomic analysis.

Jin-Hua Ran1, Ting-Ting Shen2, Hui Wu3, Xun Gong4, Xiao-Quan Wang5.   

Abstract

Pinaceae comprises 11 genera, and represents the largest family of conifers with an extensive wild distribution in the Northern Hemisphere. Intergeneric relationships of Pinaceae have been investigated using many morphological characters and molecular markers, but phylogenetic positions of four genera, including Cathaya, Cedrus, Nothotsuga and Pseudolarix, remain controversial or have not been completely resolved. To completely resolve the intergeneric relationships of Pinaceae, we conducted a comparative transcriptomic study of 14 species representing all Pinaceae genera. Multiple data sets, containing up to 6,369,681 sites across 4676 loci, were analyzed using concatenation and coalescent methods. Our study generated a robust topology, which divides Pinaceae into two clades, one (pinoid) including Cathaya, Larix, Picea, Pinus, and Pseudotsuga, and the other (abietoid) including Abies, Cedrus, Keteleeria, Nothotsuga, Pseudolarix, and Tsuga. Cathaya and Pinus form a clade sister to Picea; Cedrus is sister to the remaining abietoid genera, and the two genera Nothotsuga and Tsuga form a clade sister to Pseudolarix. The discordant positions of Cathaya, Cedrus and Pseudolarix in different gene trees could be explained by ancient radiation and/or molecular homoplastic evolution. The hybrid origin hypothesis of Nothotsuga is not supported. Based on molecular dating, extant Pinaceae genera diverged since about 206 Mya, earlier than the break-up of Pangea, and the divergence among the pinoid genera occurred earlier than the split among the abietoid genera. Moreover, our study indicates that two radiation events occurred in the evolution of Pinaceae genera, and some important morphological characters evolved multiple times based on ancestral state reconstruction.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cathaya; Cedrus; Convergence; Divergence times; Phylogenomics; Pinaceae

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30153503     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  17 in total

1.  Phylotranscriptomics of Theaceae: generic-level relationships, reticulation and whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Qiong Zhang; Lei Zhao; Ryan A Folk; Jian-Li Zhao; Nelson A Zamora; Shi-Xiong Yang; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Lian-Ming Gao; Hua Peng; Xiang-Qin Yu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Fast and accurate bootstrap confidence limits on genome-scale phylogenies using little bootstraps.

Authors:  Sudip Sharma; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Nat Comput Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Phylogenomic and Macroevolutionary Evidence for an Explosive Radiation of a Plant Genus in the Miocene.

Authors:  Hanghui Kong; Fabien L Condamine; Lihua Yang; A J Harris; Chao Feng; Fang Wen; Ming Kang
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 9.160

4.  A novel cupulate seed plant, Xadzigacalix quatsinoensis gen. et sp. nov., provides new insight into the Mesozoic radiation of gymnosperms.

Authors:  Ashley A Klymiuk; Gar W Rothwell; Ruth A Stockey
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Phylogenomic and ecological analyses reveal the spatiotemporal evolution of global pines.

Authors:  Wei-Tao Jin; David S Gernandt; Christian Wehenkel; Xiao-Mei Xia; Xiao-Xin Wei; Xiao-Quan Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Phylogeny, biogeography and taxonomic re-assessment of Multifurca (Russulaceae, Russulales) using three-locus data.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Wang; Roy E Halling; Valérie Hofstetter; Teresa Lebel; Bart Buyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Purifying selection does not drive signatures of convergent local adaptation of lodgepole pine and interior spruce.

Authors:  Mengmeng Lu; Kathryn A Hodgins; Jon C Degner; Sam Yeaman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Keteleeria fortunei (Pinaceae).

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Cheng Zhang; Min Zhang; Yongfu Li; Xianrong Wang; Yifan Duan
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 0.658

9.  Reconstructing Krassilovia mongolica supports recognition of a new and unusual group of Mesozoic conifers.

Authors:  Fabiany Herrera; Gongle Shi; Chris Mays; Niiden Ichinnorov; Masamichi Takahashi; Joseph J Bevitt; Patrick S Herendeen; Peter R Crane
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Unbiased Subgenome Evolution in Allotetraploid Species of Ephedra and Its Implications for the Evolution of Large Genomes in Gymnosperms.

Authors:  Hui Wu; Qiong Yu; Jin-Hua Ran; Xiao-Quan Wang
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.