| Literature DB >> 30153491 |
Saurabh Chhabra1, Ying Liu2, Michael T Hemmer3, Luciano Costa4, Joseph A Pidala5, Daniel R Couriel6, Amin M Alousi7, Navneet S Majhail8, Robert K Stuart9, Dennis Kim10, Olle Ringden11, Alvaro Urbano-Ispizua12, Ayman Saad4, Bipin N Savani13, Brenda Cooper14, David I Marks15, Gerard Socie16, Harry C Schouten17, Helene Schoemans18, Hisham Abdel-Azim19, Jean Yared20, Jean-Yves Cahn21, John Wagner22, Joseph H Antin23, Leo F Verdonck24, Leslie Lehmann23, Mahmoud D Aljurf25, Margaret L MacMillan26, Mark R Litzow27, Melhem M Solh28, Muna Qayed29, Peiman Hematti30, Rammurti T Kamble31, Ravi Vij32, Robert J Hayashi33, Robert P Gale34, Rodrigo Martino35, Sachiko Seo36, Shahrukh K Hashmi37, Taiga Nishihori5, Takanori Teshima38, Usama Gergis39, Yoshihiro Inamoto40, Stephen R Spellman41, Mukta Arora42, Betty K Hamilton8.
Abstract
The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) such as tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CYSP) with methotrexate (MTX) or with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been commonly used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), but there are limited data comparing efficacy of the 2 regimens. We evaluated 1564 adult patients who underwent RIC alloHCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) from 2000 to 2013 using HLA-identical sibling (matched related donor [MRD]) or unrelated donor (URD) peripheral blood graft and received CYSP or TAC with MTX or MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes of the study were acute and chronic GVHD and overall survival (OS). The study divided the patient population into 4 cohorts based on regimen: MMF-TAC, MMF-CYSP, MTX-TAC, and MTX-CYSP. In the URD group, MMF-CYSP was associated with increased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (relative risk [RR], 1.78; P < .001) and grade III to IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.93; P = .006) compared with MTX-TAC. In the URD group, use of MMF-TAC (versus MTX-TAC) lead to higher nonrelapse mortality. (hazard ratio, 1.48; P = .008). In either group, no there was no difference in chronic GVHD, disease-free survival, and OS among the GVHD prophylaxis regimens. For RIC alloHCT using MRD, there are no differences in outcomes based on GVHD prophylaxis. However, with URD RIC alloHCT, MMF-CYSP was inferior to MTX-based regimens for acute GVHD prevention, but all the regimens were equivalent in terms of chronic GVHD and OS. Prospective studies, targeting URD recipients are needed to confirm these results.Entities:
Keywords: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; Calcineurin inhibitor Tacrolimus; Cyclosporine; Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis; Methotrexate; Mycophenolate mofetil; Reduced-intensity conditioning
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30153491 PMCID: PMC6355336 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742