| Literature DB >> 30153271 |
Alison P H Savo1, Yaxin Zheng2, Yuting Zheng2, Gregory A Lewbart1.
Abstract
A group of injured yellow-bellied sliders (Trachemys scripta) and river cooters (Pseudemys concinna) were evaluated for a variety of health values at presentation to the NC State Turtle Rescue Team and prior to release. An i-STAT Portable Clinical Analyzer and CG8+ cartridges were used to determine venous blood gas and biochemical values, the packed cell volume (PCV) and total protein were evaluated using hematocrit tubes and high speed centrifugation, and a differential WBC percentage was determined manually with Diff-Quick stained blood smear slides. Forty-six turtles were sampled on presentation and twenty-three of those were sampled again prior to release. Blood values were analyzed for significant differences between samples collected at presentation and prior to release, as well as differences between surviving and non-surviving turtles. Five variables were identified as significantly different between presenting and recuperated samples: pH, pCO2, Glu, % heterophils, and % eosinophils. When comparing samples between turtles that survived versus those that did not, two variables were identified as being significant prognostic indicators; lactate and PCV. Identification of these significant variables can aid in determining patient prognosis and triage therapy for injured aquatic turtles.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30153271 PMCID: PMC6112633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Descriptive statistics of NC State turtle rescue research.
| Variable | Blood test 1 (n = 46) | Blood test 2 (n = 23) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |
| Sex | 23 Males | 0.51 | Didn’t measure second time | |
| Weight | 1608.73 | 915.97 | Didn’t measure second time | |
| Temperature | 22.01 | 2.02 | Didn’t measure second time | |
| PCV | 16.13 | 8.12 | 17.83 | 5.40 |
| TP | 4.41 | 4.13 | 3.92 | 1.26 |
| Lactate | 5.06 | 5.98 | 1.37 | 1.08 |
| pHA | 7.55 | 0.20 | 7.90 | 0.14 |
| pHM | 7.04 | 1.85 | 6.83 | 2.65 |
| pCO2A | 33.65 | 23.12 | 19.74 | 5.00 |
| pCO2M | 31.03 | 13.19 | 20.39 | 5.36 |
| pO2A | 41.85 | 36.09 | 76.40 | 29.83 |
| pO2M | 73.50 | 40.66 | 115.43 | 31.58 |
| Na | 128.13 | 9.67 | 127.6 | 7.44 |
| K | 3.82 | 1.21 | 2.90 | 0.53 |
| iCaA | 0.96 | 0.56 | 0.98 | 0.46 |
| iCaM | 1.12 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 0.41 |
| Glu | 148.83 | 105.72 | 55.30 | 24.55 |
| WBC Count | 9104.55 | 6166.45 | 8640.00 | 3420.43 |
| % Heterophils | 62.18 | 18.83 | 43.75 | 23.01 |
| % Eosinophils | 15.70 | 14.57 | 25.25 | 23.49 |
| % Lymphs | 12.82 | 8.02 | 16.85 | 9.38 |
| % Basophils | 0.50 | 2.72 | 0.50 | 1.19 |
| % Monocytes | 3.52 | 4.66 | 8.20 | 6.65 |
| % Azurophils | 5.23 | 4.83 | 5.35 | 4.98 |
Note
1. Only 45 turtles have sex values. One turtle missing sex value.
2. Calculation based on first measurement temperature since turtle’s body temperature to be the fairly static.
Hotelling’s T test summary.
| Hotelling’s | F | df1 (p) | df2 (n-p) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 869.045 | 17.242 | 14 | 5 | 0.0026798 |
Note: d represents the averages of the difference of blood test 1 –test 2 for each variable.
Results of 95% Bonferroni simultaneous confidence intervals.
| Variable | Lower Bonferroni CI | Upper Bonferroni CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PH | -0.264 | -0.42 | -0.1 |
| PCO2 | 13.336 | 1.95 | 24.72 |
| Glu | 51.15 | 8.76 | 93.54 |
| % Heterophils | 18.3 | 4.36 | 32.24 |
Note: d represents the averages of the difference of blood test 1 –test 2 for each variable.
Fig 195% Bonferroni simultaneous confidence interval for significant variables.
Logistic regression output.
| Variable | SE | Odds Ratio | Inverse Odds Ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | 3.214 | 7.069 | 0.649 | 24.879 | |
| Sex | -0.959 | 0.704 | 0.173 | 0.383 | 2.611 |
| Temperature | -0.348 | 0.328 | 0.289 | 0.706 | 1.416 |
| PCV | 0.228 | 0.103 | 0.027 | 1.255 | |
| Lactate | -0.300 | 0.151 | 0.047 | 0.741 | 1.350 |
| PO2 | 0.051 | 0.028 | 0.067 | 1.053 |
Note
*p < .10.
**p < .05.
***p < .01.
Fig 2ROC Curve for multiple logistic regression model.
Fig 3Decision tree output.