Literature DB >> 30152890

Interaction between socioeconomic deprivation and likelihood of pre-emptive transplantation: influence of competing risks and referral characteristics - a retrospective study.

Keith A Gillis1, Jennifer S Lees1, Maximilian R Ralston2, Julie A Glen2, Karen S Stevenson2, Siobhan K McManus2, Colin C Geddes2, Marc Clancy2, Jamie P Traynor2, Patrick B Mark1.   

Abstract

Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) influences likelihood of pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PET), but the mechanisms behind this are unclear. We explored the relationships between SED and patient characteristics at referral, which might explain this discrepancy. A retrospective cohort study was performed. SED was measured by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD). Logistic regression evaluated predictors of PET. A competing risks survival analysis evaluated the interaction between SED and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and death. Of 7765 patients with follow-up of 5.69 ± 6.52 years, 1298 developed ESKD requiring RRT; 113 received PET, 64 of which were from live donors. Patients receiving PET were "less deprived" with higher SIMD (5 ± 7 vs. 4 ± 5; P = 0.003). This appeared independent of overall comorbidity burden. SED was associated with a higher risk of death but not ESKD. Higher SIMD decile was associated with a higher likelihood of PET (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06, 1.23); the presence of diabetes and malignancy also reduced PET. SED was associated with reduced likelihood of PET after adjustment for baseline comorbidity, and this was not explained by risk of death or faster progression to ESKD. Education and outreach into transplantation should be augmented in areas with higher deprivation.
© 2018 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competing risks survival analysis; end-stage kidney disease; pre-emptive kidney transplantation; socioeconomic deprivation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30152890     DOI: 10.1111/tri.13336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  2 in total

1.  Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects.

Authors:  Steef Redeker; Emma K Massey; Charlotte Boonstra; Jan J van Busschbach; Reinier Timman; Harald F H Brulez; Daan A A M J Hollander; Luuk B Hilbrands; Frederike Bemelman; Stefan P Berger; Jacqueline van de Wetering; René M A van den Dorpel; Margriet Dekker-Jansen; Willem Weimar; Sohal Y Ismail
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.842

2.  Pearls and Pitfalls in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation After 5 Decades.

Authors:  Loes Oomen; Charlotte Bootsma-Robroeks; Elisabeth Cornelissen; Liesbeth de Wall; Wout Feitz
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.569

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.