| Literature DB >> 30152307 |
Clare Rock1, Michael Anderson1, Shawna Lewis1, Verna Scheeler1, Elaine Nowakowski2, Yea-Jen Hsu3, Aaron M Milstone1, Karen C Carroll1, Lisa L Maragakis1, Patricia J Simner1.
Abstract
The ideal sampling method and benefit of qualitative versus quantitative culture for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) recovery in hospitalized patient rooms and bathrooms is unknown. Although the use of nylon-flocked swabs improved overall gram-negative organism recovery compared with cellulose sponges, they were similar for CRE recovery. Quantitative culture was inferior and unrevealing beyond the qualitative results.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30152307 PMCID: PMC6619416 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ISSN: 0899-823X Impact factor: 3.254