Literature DB >> 30152078

Somatic mutation load and spectra: A record of DNA damage and repair in healthy human cells.

Natalie Saini1, Dmitry A Gordenin1.   

Abstract

Somatic genome instability is a hallmark of cancer genomes and has been linked to aging and a variety of other pathologies. Large-scale cancer genome and exome sequencing have revealed that mutation load and spectra in cancers can be influenced by environmental exposures, the anatomical site of exposures, and tissue type. There is now an abundance of data favoring the hypothesis that a substantial portion of the mutations in cancers originate prior to carcinogenesis in stem cells of the healthy individual. Rapid advances in sequencing of noncancer cells from healthy humans have shown that their mutation loads and spectra resemble cancer data. Similar to cancer genomes, mutation profiles of healthy cells show marked intra-individual variation, thus providing a metric of the various factors-environmental and endogenous-involved in mutagenesis in these individuals. This review focuses on the current methodologies to measure mutation loads and to determine mutation signatures for evaluating the environmental and endogenous sources of DNA damage in human somatic cells. We anticipate that in future, such large-scale studies aimed at exploring the landscapes of somatic mutations across different cell types in healthy people would provide a valuable resource for designing personalized preventative strategies against diseases associated with somatic genome instability. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:672-686, 2018. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genome-wide mutation rate; human somatic mutations; mutation signatures; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30152078      PMCID: PMC6188803          DOI: 10.1002/em.22215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  105 in total

1.  Somatic mutation hotspots correlate with DNA polymerase eta error spectrum.

Authors:  I B Rogozin; Y I Pavlov; K Bebenek; T Matsuda; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 25.606

2.  Somatic point mutations occurring early in development: a monozygotic twin study.

Authors:  Rui Li; Alexandre Montpetit; Marylène Rousseau; Si Yu Margaret Wu; Celia M T Greenwood; Timothy D Spector; Michael Pollak; Constantin Polychronakos; J Brent Richards
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Single-cell template strand sequencing by Strand-seq enables the characterization of individual homologs.

Authors:  Ashley D Sanders; Ester Falconer; Mark Hills; Diana C J Spierings; Peter M Lansdorp
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  A mutator phenotype in cancer.

Authors:  L A Loeb
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma.

Authors:  Brett E Johnson; Tali Mazor; Chibo Hong; Michael Barnes; Koki Aihara; Cory Y McLean; Shaun D Fouse; Shogo Yamamoto; Hiroki Ueda; Kenji Tatsuno; Saurabh Asthana; Llewellyn E Jalbert; Sarah J Nelson; Andrew W Bollen; W Clay Gustafson; Elise Charron; William A Weiss; Ivan V Smirnov; Jun S Song; Adam B Olshen; Soonmee Cha; Yongjun Zhao; Richard A Moore; Andrew J Mungall; Steven J M Jones; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra; Nobuhito Saito; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Akitake Mukasa; Mitchel S Berger; Susan M Chang; Barry S Taylor; Joseph F Costello
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Accessing Genetic Information with Liquid Biopsies.

Authors:  Xuyu Cai; Filip Janku; Qimin Zhan; Jian-Bing Fan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Tumor evolution. High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin.

Authors:  Iñigo Martincorena; Amit Roshan; Moritz Gerstung; Peter Ellis; Peter Van Loo; Stuart McLaren; David C Wedge; Anthony Fullam; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Jose M Tubio; Lucy Stebbings; Andrew Menzies; Sara Widaa; Michael R Stratton; Philip H Jones; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Direct, genome-wide assessment of DNA mutations in single cells.

Authors:  Michael Gundry; Wenge Li; Shahina Bano Maqbool; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life.

Authors:  Francis Blokzijl; Joep de Ligt; Myrthe Jager; Valentina Sasselli; Sophie Roerink; Nobuo Sasaki; Meritxell Huch; Sander Boymans; Ewart Kuijk; Pjotr Prins; Isaac J Nijman; Inigo Martincorena; Michal Mokry; Caroline L Wiegerinck; Sabine Middendorp; Toshiro Sato; Gerald Schwank; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Monique M A Verstegen; Luc J W van der Laan; Jeroen de Jonge; Jan N M IJzermans; Robert G Vries; Marc van de Wetering; Michael R Stratton; Hans Clevers; Edwin Cuppen; Ruben van Boxtel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  An empirical Bayesian framework for somatic mutation detection from cancer genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Yuichi Shiraishi; Yusuke Sato; Kenichi Chiba; Yusuke Okuno; Yasunobu Nagata; Kenichi Yoshida; Norio Shiba; Yasuhide Hayashi; Haruki Kume; Yukio Homma; Masashi Sanada; Seishi Ogawa; Satoru Miyano
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Primordial follicle reserve, DNA damage and macrophage infiltration in the ovaries of the long-living Ames dwarf mice.

Authors:  Tatiana Dandolini Saccon; Monique Tomazele Rovani; Driele Neske Garcia; Rafael Gianella Mondadori; Luis Augusto Xavier Cruz; Carlos Castilho Barros; Andrzej Bartke; Michal M Masternak; Augusto Schneider
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Mutation signatures specific to DNA alkylating agents in yeast and cancers.

Authors:  Natalie Saini; Joan F Sterling; Cynthia J Sakofsky; Camille K Giacobone; Leszek J Klimczak; Adam B Burkholder; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Growth hormone increases DNA damage in ovarian follicles and macrophage infiltration in the ovaries.

Authors:  Tatiana D Saccon; Monique T Rovani; Driele N Garcia; Jorgea Pradiee; Rafael G Mondadori; Luis Augusto X Cruz; Carlos C Barros; Yimin Fang; Samuel McFadden; Jeffrey B Mason; Andrzej Bartke; Michal M Masternak; Augusto Schneider
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 7.581

4.  Germline mutation rates in young adults predict longevity and reproductive lifespan.

Authors:  Huong D Meeks; Thomas A Sasani; Richard M Cawthon; Ken R Smith; Richard A Kerber; Elizabeth O'Brien; Lisa Baird; Melissa M Dixon; Andreas P Peiffer; Mark F Leppert; Aaron R Quinlan; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  UV-exposure, endogenous DNA damage, and DNA replication errors shape the spectra of genome changes in human skin.

Authors:  Natalie Saini; Camille K Giacobone; Leszek J Klimczak; Brian N Papas; Adam B Burkholder; Jian-Liang Li; David C Fargo; Re Bai; Kevin Gerrish; Cynthia L Innes; Shepherd H Schurman; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  DNA damage repair: historical perspectives, mechanistic pathways and clinical translation for targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ruixue Huang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-07-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.