INTRODUCTION: The quantitative measurement of the left ventricle by echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of acquired and congenital diseases in the pediatric population. The objective of this study was to validate an automated three-dimensional adaptive analytic echocardiographic algorithm, the so-called Heart Model® (HM) in the pediatric population, using as comparators the left atrial and left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction obtained by means of conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography. METHODS: Pilot study, where a population comprised of 75 consecutive patients aged 6-17 years who attended a pediatric cardiology clinic, was evaluated. Every patient underwent a conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography and an analysis using HM. Conventional 3D echo was used as the reference method. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were analyzed. Mean age was 11.2 (4.0) years (52.2% women). The intraclass correlation coefficient of HM vs 2D echo was poor, but it was good for the agreement between HM and 3D echo for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (ICC: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99; P < 0.001), left ventricular end-systolic volume ICC: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99; P = 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (ICC: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.92; P < 0.001). The agreement was also good for the three parameters when the analysis was performed according to body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Heart Model® is a feasible and accurate tool for the evaluation of left atrial and left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction in pediatric population aged above 6 years.
INTRODUCTION: The quantitative measurement of the left ventricle by echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and prognosis of acquired and congenital diseases in the pediatric population. The objective of this study was to validate an automated three-dimensional adaptive analytic echocardiographic algorithm, the so-called Heart Model® (HM) in the pediatric population, using as comparators the left atrial and left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction obtained by means of conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography. METHODS: Pilot study, where a population comprised of 75 consecutive patients aged 6-17 years who attended a pediatric cardiology clinic, was evaluated. Every patient underwent a conventional 2D and 3D echocardiography and an analysis using HM. Conventional 3D echo was used as the reference method. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were analyzed. Mean age was 11.2 (4.0) years (52.2% women). The intraclass correlation coefficient of HM vs 2D echo was poor, but it was good for the agreement between HM and 3D echo for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (ICC: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99; P < 0.001), left ventricular end-systolic volume ICC: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99; P = 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (ICC: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.78-0.92; P < 0.001). The agreement was also good for the three parameters when the analysis was performed according to body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Heart Model® is a feasible and accurate tool for the evaluation of left atrial and left ventricular volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction in pediatric population aged above 6 years.