Alexandra E Chambers1, Jacob Frick1, Natalee Tanner1, Richard Gerkin2, Madappa Kundranda3, Tomislav Dragovich4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA. 2. Graduate Medical Research, Banner-University Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA. 3. Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA. 4. Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few treatment options in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after progression on standard chemotherapy. Third and fourth line therapies typically consist of regorafenib or trifluridine-tipiracil, however, clinical benefit of these medications is limited, as progression free survival is approximately 1.9 months for regorafenib (Grothey et al. 2013) and 2.0 months for trifluridine-tipiracil (Mayer et al. 2015). Another choice in this setting may include the re-initiation of previously used chemotherapy, therefore in this study we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy re-challenge. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study assessing patients with mCRC who were 18-89 years of age and treated with re-challenge chemotherapy. Re-challenge chemotherapy was defined as re-initiation of oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based regimens at least nine months from the end of initial exposure. A minimum of four chemotherapy cycles was required to qualify as initial exposure. The key endpoints of this study were clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the proportion of patients with partial response or stable disease, and time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: A total of 67 chemotherapy re-challenges were accounted for in 51 patients. The overall CBR was 70.7%. Partial responses occurred in 50.7% cases. The TTP was 6.0 months. For the 51 cases of first re-challenge, the CBR was 75.5% and TTP was 6.5 months. Fourteen patients had a second re-challenge, and in these patients, the CBR was 61.5% and TTP was 4.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based re-challenge should be considered as a third or fourth line treatment option in select patients with mCRC. CBR and especially TTP compare favorably to approved third line therapies such as regorafenib or trifluridine-tipiracil.
BACKGROUND: There are few treatment options in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after progression on standard chemotherapy. Third and fourth line therapies typically consist of regorafenib or trifluridine-tipiracil, however, clinical benefit of these medications is limited, as progression free survival is approximately 1.9 months for regorafenib (Grothey et al. 2013) and 2.0 months for trifluridine-tipiracil (Mayer et al. 2015). Another choice in this setting may include the re-initiation of previously used chemotherapy, therefore in this study we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy re-challenge. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study assessing patients with mCRC who were 18-89 years of age and treated with re-challenge chemotherapy. Re-challenge chemotherapy was defined as re-initiation of oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based regimens at least nine months from the end of initial exposure. A minimum of four chemotherapy cycles was required to qualify as initial exposure. The key endpoints of this study were clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the proportion of patients with partial response or stable disease, and time to progression (TTP). RESULTS: A total of 67 chemotherapy re-challenges were accounted for in 51 patients. The overall CBR was 70.7%. Partial responses occurred in 50.7% cases. The TTP was 6.0 months. For the 51 cases of first re-challenge, the CBR was 75.5% and TTP was 6.5 months. Fourteen patients had a second re-challenge, and in these patients, the CBR was 61.5% and TTP was 4.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin or irinotecan-based re-challenge should be considered as a third or fourth line treatment option in select patients with mCRC. CBR and especially TTP compare favorably to approved third line therapies such as regorafenib or trifluridine-tipiracil.
Authors: Robert J Mayer; Eric Van Cutsem; Alfredo Falcone; Takayuki Yoshino; Rocio Garcia-Carbonero; Nobuyuki Mizunuma; Kentaro Yamazaki; Yasuhiro Shimada; Josep Tabernero; Yoshito Komatsu; Alberto Sobrero; Eveline Boucher; Marc Peeters; Ben Tran; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Alberto Zaniboni; Howard Hochster; James M Cleary; Hans Prenen; Fabio Benedetti; Hirokazu Mizuguchi; Lukas Makris; Masanobu Ito; Atsushi Ohtsu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Auxiliadora Gómez-España; Bartomeu Massutí; Javier Sastre; Albert Abad; Manuel Valladares; Fernando Rivera; Maria J Safont; Purificación Martínez de Prado; Manuel Gallén; Encarnación González; Eugenio Marcuello; Manuel Benavides; Carlos Fernández-Martos; Ferrán Losa; Pilar Escudero; Antonio Arrivi; Andrés Cervantes; Rosario Dueñas; Amelia López-Ladrón; Adelaida Lacasta; Marta Llanos; Jose M Tabernero; Antonio Antón; Enrique Aranda Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-01-10
Authors: Axel Grothey; Eric Van Cutsem; Alberto Sobrero; Salvatore Siena; Alfredo Falcone; Marc Ychou; Yves Humblet; Olivier Bouché; Laurent Mineur; Carlo Barone; Antoine Adenis; Josep Tabernero; Takayuki Yoshino; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Frank Cihon; Lisa Cupit; Andrea Wagner; Dirk Laurent Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Howard S Hochster; Lowell L Hart; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Barrett H Childs; John D Hainsworth; Allen L Cohn; Lucas Wong; Louis Fehrenbacher; Yousif Abubakr; M Wasif Saif; Lee Schwartzberg; Eric Hedrick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jessica L Freeling; Jamie L Scholl; Morgan Eikanger; Cole Knoblich; Rashaun A Potts; David J Anderson; Joseph E Rower; Mohammad Hadi Farjoo; Haotian Zhao; Angela Pillatzki; Khosrow Rezvani Journal: Cell Death Discov Date: 2022-03-28