Literature DB >> 30151262

Outcome and factors associated with aborted cytoreduction for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Whitney Guerrero1, Gitonga Munene2, Paxton V Dickson1, Zachary E Stiles1, Johnathan Mays3, Andrew M Davidoff4, Evan S Glazer1, David Shibata1, Jeremiah L Deneve1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) offers a potential cure for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), whereas aborted cytoreduction is associated with a poor outcome. We evaluate factors associated with aborted CRS procedures.
METHODS: An IRB approved retrospective review was performed from 12/2011 to 2/2016. Clinicopathologic variables and outcomes are described.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients underwent attempted CRS/HIPEC which was completed in 51 (69%) and aborted in 23 (31%). There was no difference in age, race, gender or prior treatment between groups. Patients who underwent aborted procedures had a higher peritoneal cancer index (PCI, 26.1±9.9 vs. 16.2±10.5, P=0.001). Overall survival (OS) was significantly improved for patients who underwent completed CRS/HIPEC (41.0±10.4 vs. 6.0±2.3 months, P<0.0001). Patients with an appendiceal and colorectal primary who underwent CRS/HIPEC had a significantly better outcome (median not reached vs. 6±5.4 months, P<0.0001, and 28.0±7.5 vs. 8.0±4.0 months, P<0.0001, respectively). Colorectal pathology (P=0.014) and PCI score (<0.0001) were independent predictors of aborted CRS procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients with PC had significant disease which prevented successful completion of CRS/HIPEC. PCI and colorectal primary tumor pathology were associated with a greater likelihood of aborted CRS procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinomatosis; aborted; colorectal cancer; cytoreduction; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30151262      PMCID: PMC6087853          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.04.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  28 in total

Review 1.  Intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia: rationale, technique, indications, and results.

Authors:  D M Elias; J F Ouellet
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Peritoneal cancer patients not suitable for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC during explorative surgery: risk factors, treatment options, and prognosis.

Authors:  T R van Oudheusden; H J Braam; M D P Luyer; M J Wiezer; B van Ramshorst; S W Nienhuijs; I H J T de Hingh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  The importance of the learning curve and surveillance of surgical performance in peritoneal surface malignancy programs.

Authors:  Shigeki Kusamura; Dario Baratti; Ionut Hutanu; Piero Rossi; Marcello Deraco
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  The role of laparoscopy to evaluate candidates for complete cytoreduction of peritoneal carcinomatosis and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  C Pomel; T-L Appleyard; S Gouy; R Rouzier; D Elias
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Treatment of primary colon cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison of concomitant vs. delayed management.

Authors:  S R Pestieau; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Institutional learning curve of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion for peritoneal malignancies.

Authors:  Patricio M Polanco; Ying Ding; Jordan M Knox; Lekshmi Ramalingam; Heather Jones; Melissa E Hogg; Amer H Zureikat; Matthew P Holtzman; James Pingpank; Steven Ahrendt; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  O Glehen; F Kwiatkowski; P H Sugarbaker; D Elias; E A Levine; M De Simone; R Barone; Y Yonemura; F Cavaliere; F Quenet; M Gutman; A A K Tentes; G Lorimier; J L Bernard; J M Bereder; J Porcheron; A Gomez-Portilla; P Shen; M Deraco; P Rat
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  8-year follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Vic J Verwaal; Sjoerd Bruin; Henk Boot; Gooike van Slooten; Harm van Tinteren
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Predictors of survival in patients with high-grade peritoneal metastases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Heather L Van Sweringen; Dennis J Hanseman; Syed A Ahmad; Michael J Edwards; Jeffrey J Sussman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Prognostic indicators in peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Rhonda L Harmon; Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-02-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes: a single-center early experience propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Tali Shaltiel; Daniel Solomon; Eric R Pletcher; Benjamin J Golas; Deepa R Magge; Umut Sarpel; Daniel M Labow; Noah A Cohen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  When we open and close: Postoperative outcomes after aborted primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Connor C Wang; Matthew K Wagar; Amy Godecker; Ahmed Al-Niaimi; David M Kushner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-04-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.