| Literature DB >> 30150998 |
Eleni Tani1, Dimosthenis Kizis2, Emilia Markellou2, Ioannis Papadakis3, Dimitra Tsamadia1, Georgios Leventis1, Despoina Makrogianni4, Ioannis Karapanos4.
Abstract
Several studies regarding the imposition of stresses simultaneously in plants have shown that plant responses are different under individual and combined stress. Pathogen infection in combination with drought can act both additively and antagonistically, suggesting a tailored-made plant response to these stresses. The aforementioned combination of stresses can be considered as one of the most important factors affecting global crop production. In the present research we studied eggplant responses to simultaneous Verticillium dahliae infection and drought with respect to the application of the individual stresses alone and investigated the extent to which these responses were cultivar dependent. Two eggplant cultivars (Skoutari and EMI) with intermediate resistance to V. dahliae were subjected to combined stress for a 3-week period. Significant differences in plant growth, several physiological and biochemical parameters (photosynthesis rate, leaf gas exchanges, Malondialdehyde, Proline) and gene expression, were found between plants subjected to combined and individual stresses. Furthermore, plant growth and molecular (lipid peroxidation, hydrogen peroxide, gene expression levels) changes highlight a clear discrimination between the two cultivars in response to simultaneous V. dahliae infection and drought. Our results showed that combined stress affects significantly plants responses compared to the application of individual stresses alone and that these responses are cultivar dependent.Entities:
Keywords: Verticillium dahliae; combined stress; cultivar; eggplant; molecular responses; plant growth; plant physiological; water stress
Year: 2018 PMID: 30150998 PMCID: PMC6099113 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01181
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Primers sequences used for the gene expression study.
| Primer name | Sequence 5′ to 3′ | Gene target | GenBank/Sol Genomics Network ID | Amplicon length (bp) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sm-AREB-F | GGGATGGTTGGTATCGCTGA | Sme2.5_12232.1_g00002.1 | 100 | This study | |
| Sm-AREB-R | CTCCAGCCCCTAAACCTACC | ||||
| Sm-CBF1-F | TGGGTTTGCGAAGTCAGAGA | Sme2.5_16389.1_g00001.1 | 121 | This study | |
| Sm-CBF1-R | CAGAACGGCCCCTTAATGCT | ||||
| Sm-NAC-F | GAGCACCTTCCTCCTGGATT | Sme2.5_15135.1_g00001.1 | 147 | This study | |
| Sm-NAC-R | AGGCAATTCCCAAGGGTCG | ||||
| Sm-PR1-F | GTGGGTCGATGAGAAGCAAT | AB222697.1 | 92 | This study | |
| Sm-PR1-R | TACGCCACACCACCTGAGTA | ||||
| Sm-PR5-F | CAAACACCCTGGCTGAATACG | Sme2.5_30700.1_g00001.1 | 113 | This study | |
| Sm-PR5-R | ACTAGGATTGGTCGGTGCAA | ||||
| Sm-LOX-F | GGAGGGATCAAACTTCCTCA | AB244527.1 | 101 | This study | |
| Sm-LOX-R | ATTCCTTCACCGTCTGTTCG | ||||
| Sm-Actin-F | ACCACAGCTGAGCGAGAAAT | JX524155.1 | 133 | ||
| Sm-Actin-R | GACCATCGGGAAGCTCATAG |
Effect of, and interactions between, Verticillium dahliae, drought stress and cultivars on developmental, physiological and biochemical parameters eggplants (3-factor ANOVA).
| Factors | RGR (cm⋅day-1 cm-1) | Root/Stem length ratio | Shoot/Root fresh weight ratio | Shoot/Root dry weight ratio | WUE (μmol CO2⋅mmol H2O-1) | H2O2 (μmol⋅25 g-1) | MDA (μmol g-1) | Proline (mg⋅100 g-1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | 0.020 | 1.01 | 7.83 | 5.67 | 132.11 | 57.1 | 194.5 | |||
| ( | Yes | 0.020 | 0.95 | 7.32 | 6.03 | 146.24 | 61.1 | 222.1 | ||
| No | 0.98 | |||||||||
| ( | Yes | 0.98 | ||||||||
| Skoutari | 7.86 | 5.72 | 139.12 | 61.4 | ||||||
| ( | EMI | 7.30 | 5.99 | 139.23 | 56.7 | |||||
| NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||
| Drought stress (DS) | NS | |||||||||
| Cultivars (C) | NS | NS | NS | |||||||
| Vd x DS | NS | NS | NS | |||||||
| Vd x C | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | ||
| DS x C | NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |||||
| Vd x DS x C | NS | NS | NS | |||||||
Effect of Verticillium dahliae infection and drought stress on eggplant developmental, physiological and biochemical parameters.
| RGR (cm⋅day-1⋅cm-1) | Shoot/Root fresh weight ratio | WUE (μmol CO2⋅mmol H2O-1) | MDA (μmol g-1) | Proline (mg⋅100 g-1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no DS – no Vd | 0.025 d | 25.70 c | 3.46 a | 74.25 a | 12.6 a | 26.1 a |
| DS – no Vd | 0.015 a | 5.31 a | 7.87 c | 189.98 c | 101.6 c | 362.9 d |
| no DS – Vd | 0.022 c | 8.10 b | 5.11 b | 121.66 b | 53.57 b | 310.6 c |
| DS – Vd | 0.019 b | 5.20 a | 6.96 c | 170.81 c | 68.2 b | 133.6 b |
| LSD | 0.0022 | 1.61 | 1.02 | 23.34 | 16.73 | 47.51 |