Assessment of quality of life in women using Femelis Meno.

Over 30% of women suffering from menopausal symptoms use products of plant origin. This paper presents the results of a study devoted to evaluation of the efficacy of the Femelis Meno dietary supplement containing standardized flower pollen and pistil extracts (PI 82-GC FEM).

Introduction

Publication of the Women’s Health Initiative study (WHI) in 2002 and the results of the Million Women Study (MWS) published one year later raised a stormy discussion on the safety of hormonal menopausal therapy (HMT) that is still ongoing. A “side effect” of this debate, in particular of the one being conducted in non-medical media, was a worldwide collapse of the HMT market [1]. Such a drastic fall in popularity of hormonal menopausal therapy is all the more surprising as many conclusions from the WHI and MWS studies are generally criticised by global experts in the field of menopause and were not confirmed in later clinical studies. Hormonal menopausal therapy still remains the most effective method of elimination/reduction of the symptoms of oestrogen deficit, in particular of the vasomotor ones [2]. However, the reduced interest in hormonal menopausal therapy cannot go unnoticed or be underestimated. Over 30% of women suffering from menopausal symptoms use products of plant origin. Good Clinical Practice requires the doctor counselling on menopausal medicine to be ready to use a wide portfolio of various products intended to improve the quality of life of patients with menopausal symptoms [3].

The spectrum of currently available products for elimination/reduction of vasomotor symptoms related to oestrogen deficit includes the following:

systemic hormonal therapy based on administration of oestrogen or oestrogen with a progestogen,

antidepressants [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI)] – e.g. paroxetine, fluoxetine,

phytoestrogens,

non-hormonal phytotherapies.

The oncological safety profile of phytoestrogens, in particular those of soya origin, has been a subject of much controversy [4-7]. Non-hormonal phytotherapy is a new therapeutic alternative for patients suffering from menopausal symptoms. In this product group Femelis Meno seems the most promising. It contains, as active substances, standardised flower pollen and pistil extracts (PI 82-GC FEM) in combination with vitamin E as an antioxidant (one tablet of this product contains 5 mg of vitamin E, which corresponds to 42% of the recommended daily intake). In a technologically advanced patented process of PI 82-GC FEM extraction, allergens contained in flower pollen are removed. A unique technology used for this purpose makes it possible to obtain purified cytoplasm of flower pollen cells through removal of the allergen-containing envelope. The specific flower pollen cytoplasm obtained with this method contains active substances of very high bioavailability after oral administration. Owing to complete elimination of flower pollen allergens in this process, the product obtained in this way may also be used in women with allergies of different types. The main component of the active substance contained in Femelis Meno is extract PI 82 obtained from pollen of Secale cereale, Dactylis glomerata and Pinus sylvestris flowers. PI 82 also contains extracts from pollens and pistils of the Zea mays flower. The second active substance contained in Femelis Meno, called GC FEM, is the extract from Secale cereale, Zea mays and Pinus sylvestris pollen. Each tablet of Femelis Meno contains 160 mg of the extracts, in the following proportion: 75% PI 82 and 25% GC FEM. Flower pollen and pistils are selected and collected in a standardised manner in Sweden, and both the culture of flower plant species and the process of active substance extraction occur under strict quality control. This product was launched in Sweden in 1995, and now it is available under different names in 15 countries. The efficacy of this product in alleviation of vasomotor menopausal symptoms was discovered by chance during a clinical study assessing its effects in elderly women and men. During this study it was found that such vasomotor symptoms as hot flushes are significantly reduced in peri- and postmenopausal women using this product. Active substances contained in Femelis Meno do not show any hormonal mechanisms of action typical for oestrogens or phytoestrogens. PI 82-GC FEM extracts used in Femelis Meno are believed to have similar activity as the SSRIs, regulating serotonergic neuron functions in the brain that control thermoregulation, mood and sleep. Flower pollen/pistil extracts used in Femelis Meno were found to inhibit the uptake of labelled serotonin in cortical synaptosomes in rats.

Use of flower pollens for medical purposes dates back to ancient Egypt and China, where flower pollen was used to improve energy flow and to treat menstrual disorders as early as 200 B.C. Flower pollen contains microgametophytes of plants producing male germ cells. The cytoplasm of a particle of flower pollen, containing the genetic material, is protected by an envelope resembling a shell, whose dissolution (e.g. by gastric acid) is a prerequisite for bioavailability of the active pollen components. Flower pollen is composed of about 25% proteins and contains more than 130 active ingredients, i.e. amino acids (including tryptophan), vitamins, micro- and macroelements, fatty acids and antioxidants (e.g. superoxide dismutase) [8-11].

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of Femelis Meno use on the quality of life of women suffering from menopausal symptoms. The patients’ satisfaction with the therapy was also assessed.

Material and methods

This observational study included women with menopausal symptoms significantly worsening their quality of life. A study questionnaire was used that consisted of 3 parts: a sociometric interview, an obstetrical and gynaecological interview and a part assessing various quality of life aspects with two standardised questionnaires:

Menopause Rating Scale (MRS),

Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI).

The study included 3 visits:

visit 1 – qualification visit: medical history and physical examination, study course description, questionnaires, dispensing the dietary supplement along with the instructions how to use it,

visit 2 – one month from the commencement of the use of Femelis Meno: questionnaires, physical examination,

visit 3 – after 3 months of the use of Femelis Meno: questionnaires, physical examination; assessment of patient’s satisfaction with the therapy.

The study was conducted at two research sites: in Katowice and in Lublin. In both sites 50 women were recruited in total, based on the following inclusion/exclusion criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

women with menopausal symptoms – at least 35 episodes of moderate or severe hot flushes within the last 7 weeks,

consent to take part in the study,

regular intake of Femelis Meno (1 tablet BID), in accordance with the instructions,

participation in all study visits (I, II, III),

correct completion of the survey questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria:

withdrawal of the consent for participation in the study at any stage of the study,

use of any menopausal therapy (hormonal or phytotherapy) within the last 3 months,

failure to complete all 3 scheduled visits,

incorrect completion of any of the study questionnaires,

somatic diseases/mental disorders that might affect the studied aspects of the quality of life.

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the studied women.

Table 1

Characteristics of the studied group (n = 50)

Variable	Median	Minimum	Maximum	Range
Age (years)	54.0	46.0	65.0	19.0
Height (cm)	168.0	147.0	180.0	33.0
Weight (kg)	79.0	57.0	96.0	39.0

Sixty-eight percent of the studied women were postmenopausal whereas 32% still had irregular menstrual bleeding. In the studied population, median age at menarche was 13 years (10-14 years) and median age at menopause was 53 years (46-55 years). Nulliparous women represented 8% of the studied population. Median parity in the studied group of women was 2 [1-4].

Results

Tables 2-4 and Figure 1 show the comparisons of the number of hot flushes before and during therapy. Significant improvement was observed as early as after one month and this improvement was more pronounced after the subsequent two months of the treatment with Femelis Meno.

Table 2

Numbers of hot flushes in the studied women before the start and after one month of the use of Femelis Meno (n = 50)

Hot flushes		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Number of episodes of hot flushes (moderate/severe) per week	Visit 1	15.0	35.0	60.0	–3.164
	Visit 2	5.5	0.0	34.0	p = 0.002

Table 4

Numbers of hot flushes in the studied women before the start and after three months of the use of Femelis Meno (n = 50)

Hot flushes		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Number of episodes of hot flushes (moderate/severe)	Visit 1	15.0	35.0	60.0	–3.441
	Visit 3	2.0	0.0	22.5	p = 0.001

Fig. 1

Average (median) numbers of hot flushes in the studied women

Table 5 presents the results of treatment with respect to 11 parameters assessed with the MRS scale. Tables 6-8 present the significance of the differences between the parameters assessed using the MRS scale before and during the therapy. After one month of treatment significant improvement was noted with respect to such parameters as hot flushes/sweating, irritability, sexual problems and bladder problems. When comparing the symptomatic status between visits 1 and 3 (Table 8), a significant improvement was observed for almost all parameters analysed with the MRS scale, except for joint and muscle discomfort.

Table 5

Response of the studied women to treatment with respect to the severity of menopausal symptoms by visit (n = 50) – results of examination with the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)

Menopausal symptoms		None		Mild		Moderate		Severe		Very severe		No data
		n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%	n	%
Hot flushes, sweating	Visit 1	0	–	0	–	14	28.0	18	36.0	18	36.0	–	–
	Visit 2	6	12.0	16	32.0	14	28.0	10	20.0	4	8.0	–	–
	Visit 3	18	36.0	24	48.0	2	4.0	2	4.0	4	8.0	–	–
Heart problems	Visit 1	8	16.0	14	28.0	16	32.0	12	24.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 2	8	16.0	18	36.0	12	24.0	12	24.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 3	20	40.0	12	44.0	6	12.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–
Sleeping disorders	Visit 1	10	20.0	18	36.0	14	28.0	8	16.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 2	12	24.0	16	32.0	16	32.0	6	12.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 3	22	44.0	18	36.0	6	12.0	–	–	2	4.0	2	4.0
Depressive mood	Visit 1	8	16.0	12	24.0	22	44.0	8	16.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 2	12	24.0	20	40.0	10	20.0	8	16.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 3	28	56.0	14	28.0	4	8.0	2	4.0	–	–	2	4.0
Irritability	Visit 1	6	12.0	10	20.0	18	36.0	14	28.0	–	–	2	4.0
	Visit 2	10	20.0	18	36.0	16	32.0	4	8.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 3	14	28.0	28	56.0	6	12.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–
Anxiety	Visit 1	14	28.0	12	24.0	16	32.0	8	16.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 2	16	32.0	18	36.0	6	12.0	8	16.0	–	–	2	4.0
	Visit 3	38	76.0	10	20.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–	–	–
Physical and mental exhaustion	Visit 1	6	12.0	18	36.0	14	28.0	10	20.0	–	–	2	4.0
	Visit 2	6	12.0	26	52.0	12	24.0	4	8.0	–	–	2	4.0
	Visit 3	16	32.0	28	56.0	4	8.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–
Sexual problems	Visit 1	6	12.0	10	20.0	22	44.0	10	20.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 2	8	16.0	30	60.0	6	12.0	4	8.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 3	14	28.0	26	52.0	8	16.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–
Bladder problems	Visit 1	10	20.0	16	32.0	12	24.0	10	20.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 2	16	32.0	16	32.0	10	20.0	6	12.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 3	24	48.0	22	44.0	2	4.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–
Vaginal dryness	Visit 1	4	8.0	10	20.0	24	48.0	8	16.0	2	4.0	2	4.0
	Visit 2	6	12.0	16	32.0	24	48.0	2	4.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 3	22	44.0	16	32.0	8	16.0	2	4.0	–	–	2	4.0
Joint and muscle discomfort	Visit 1	14	28.0	12	24.0	20	40.0	2	4.0	2	4.0	–	–
	Visit 2	14	28.0	18	36.0	16	32.0	2	4.0	–	–	–	–
	Visit 3	16	32.0	26	52.0	8	16.0	–	–	–	–	–	–

Table 6

Severity of menopausal symptoms before the start and after one month of use of Femelis Meno (n = 50) – results of examination with the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)

Menopausal symptoms		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Hot flushes, sweating	Visit 1	3.0	0.0	4.0	–3.578
	Visit 2	2.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.000
Heart problems	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	3.0	–0.486
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.627
Sleeping disorders	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	3.0	–0.486
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.627
Depressive mood	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	3.0	–1.814
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.070
Irritability	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	3.0	–2.179
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.029
Anxiety	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	3.0	–1.222
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.222
Physical and mental exhaustion	Visit 1	1.5	0.0	3.0	–1.615
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.106
Sexual problems	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	4.0	–2.737
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.006
Bladder problems	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	4.0	–2.309
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.021
Vaginal dryness	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	4.0	–1.848
	Visit 2	2.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.065
Joint and muscle discomfort	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	4.0	–1.095
	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.273

Response rating: 0 – absent, 1 – mild, 2 – moderate, 3 – severe, 4 – very severe

Table 8

Severity of menopausal symptoms before the start and after three months of use of Femelis Meno (n = 50) – results of examination with the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)

Menopausal symptoms		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Hot flushes, sweating	Visit 1	3.0	0.0	4.0	–4.061
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.000
Heart problems	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	3.0	–3.311
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.001
Sleeping disorders	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	3.0	–2.287
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.022
Depressive mood)	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	3.0	–3.482
	Visit 3	0.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.000
Irritability	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	3.0	–3.508
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.000
Anxiety	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	3.0	–3.616
	Visit 3	0.0	0.0	2.0	p = 0.000
Physical and mental exhaustion	Visit 1	1.5	0.0	3.0	–2.982
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.003
Sexual problems	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	4.0	–3.065
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.002
Bladder problems	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	4.0	–3.630
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.000
Vaginal dryness	Visit 1	2.0	0.0	4.0	–3.938
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.000
Joint and muscle discomfort	Visit 1	1.0	0.0	4.0	–2.080
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	2.0	p = 0.38

Response rating: 0 – absent, 1 – mild, 2 – moderate, 3 – severe, 4 – very severe

Tables 9–11 illustrate the differences in six domains analysed with the FSFI questionnaire, reflecting the sexual life quality before and during the therapy. After one month of treatment, significant improvement was observed only with respect to sexual satisfaction (Table 9) and there was no statistically significant change in the total FSFI score. After the subsequent 2 months of the therapy, there was a statistically significant improvement with respect to 2 domains (arousal and lubrication) and of the FSFI total score, as compared to the pre-treatment status.

Table 9

Differences between sexual life quality parameters in the studied women before the start and after one month of use of Femelis Meno (n = 50) – results of examination with the Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI)

Parameters of sexual life quality		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Desire	Visit 1	3.6	1.2	6.0	0.934
	Visit 2	3.6	1.2	6.0	p = 0.351
Arousal	Visit 1	3.6	0.9	6.0	–0.205
	Visit 2	3.9	0.0	5.4	p = 0.838
Lubrication	Visit 1	3.6	0.0	6.0	0.202
	Visit 2	3.9	0.0	5.7	p = 0.840
Orgasm	Visit 1	3.6	1.6	6.0	0.901
	Visit 2	4.0	0.0	5.6	p = 0.367
Sexual satisfaction	Visit 1	3.8	2.0	6.0	2.327
	Visit 2	4.0	1.6	6.0	p = 0.020
Pain	Visit 1	4.0	1.6	6.0	–1.170
	Visit 2	3.6	0.0	6.0	p = 0.242
Total	Visit 1	22.1	7.3	36.0	0.465
	Visit 2	23.2	3.7	32.8	p = 0.642

Table 11

Differences between sexual life quality parameters in the studied women before the start and after three months of use of Femelis Meno (n = 50) – results of examination with the Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI)

Parameters of sexual life quality		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Desire	Visit 1	3.6	1.2	6.0	1.913
	Visit 3	4.2	1.2	6.0	p = 0.056
Arousal	Visit 1	3.6	0.9	6.0	2.233
	Visit 3	4.8	1.5	6.0	p = 0.026
Lubrication	Visit 1	3.6	0.0	6.0	2.255
	Visit 2	4.8	0.0	6.0	p = 0.024
Orgasm	Visit 1	3.6	1.6	6.0	1.720
	Visit 3	4.4	0.0	6.0	p = 0.085
Sexual satisfaction	Visit 1	3.8	2.0	6.0	1.734
	Visit 2	4.8	0.8	6.0	p = 0.083
Pain	Visit 1	4.0	1.6	6.0	0.610
	Visit 3	4.8	0.0	6.0	p = 0.542
Total	Visit 1	22.1	7.3	36.0	2.133
	Visit 3	26.8	3.5	35.6	p = 0.033

Tables 12-14 compare the proportion of patients with clinically significant disorders (FSFI total ≤ 26.55) before and during the therapy. This percentage decreased from 68% before the treatment to 44% after 3 months of treatment (Table 13), but this change did not reach statistical significance.

Table 12

Numbers of women with clinically significant sexual disorders before the start and after one month of use of Femelis Meno – results of examination with the Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI)

Sexual life quality		Number	%	Cochrane Q-test
Patients with clinically significant sexual disturbances (FSFI – total ≤ 26.55)	Visit 1	34	68.0	0.333
	Visit 2	26	52.0	p = 0.564

Table 14

Numbers of women with clinically significant sexual disorders before the start and after three months of use of Femelis Meno (n = 20) – results of examination with the Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI)

Sexual life quality		Number	%	Cochrane Q-test
Patients with clinically significant sexual disturbances (FSFI – total ≤ 26.55)	Visit 1	34	68.0	2.778
	Visit 3	22	44.0	p = 0.096

Table 13

Numbers of women with clinically significant sexual disorders after one and three months of use of Femelis Meno – results of examination with the Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI)

Sexual life quality		Number	%	Cochrane Q-test
Patients with clinically significant sexual disturbances (FSFI – total ≤ 26.55)	Visit 2	26	52.0	1.800
	Visit 3	22	44.0	p = 0.180

As shown in Table 15, after 3 months of treatment with Femelis Meno 80% of the studied patients gave positive responses to the question about their satisfaction with the results of the treatment (56.0% were very satisfied, and 24% were rather satisfied).

Table 15

Distribution of the studied group with respect to satisfaction with the effects of the use of Femelis Meno (n = 50)

Subjects are satisfied with the effects of using Femelis Meno	Number	%
Certainly satisfied	28	56.0
Rather satisfied	12	24.0
Not very satisfied	6	12.0
Certainly not satisfied	4	8.0

The question Would you recommend Femelis Meno to other women suffering from menopausal symptoms? was answered “certainly yes” by 64% of the respondents, and “probably yes” by another 16% of them. Only 4% of the studied women answered this question with “certainly not” (Table 16).

Table 16

Willingness by the studied women to recommend Femelis Meno to other women experiencing menopausal symptoms (n = 50)

Would you recommend Femelis Meno to other women suffering from menopausal symptoms?	Number	%
Certainly yes	32	64.0
Probably yes	8	16.0
Probably not	8	16.0
Certainly not	2	4.0

Discussion

Vasomotor symptoms are the most common and one of the most burdensome menopausal symptoms, and among them hot flushes are the most commonly reported by the patients [2]. To a various extent, this symptom worsens the quality of life in approximately 50% of peri- and postmenopausal women. Over 25% of women have severe or moderate hot flushes. Such women were included in the efficacy study of Femelis Meno. The study has shown very good efficacy of the product with respect to elimination of vasomotor symptoms as early as after 4 weeks of the treatment, and this effect increased during the subsequent months of the treatment.

This study demonstrated that the benefits from the use of Femelis Meno in perimenopausal women are multidirectional in nature and pertain to many both somatic and non-somatic elements responsible for the quality of life. The results of our study confirm the results obtained by other researchers. Elia and Mares [12] studied 417 menopausal women suffering from menopausal symptoms, in particular from vasomotor ones. For 84 days, these patients received a product of the same composition as Femelis Meno (GC FEM 40 mg, PI 120 mg, Vitamin E 82.5 mg), 1 tablet twice daily. The efficacy and tolerance profile of this therapy were assessed. Mean age of the patients was 54.4 years. Based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), significant improvement of sleep quality and general quality of life was found. Improvement of hot flushes and excessive sweating was highly statistically significant. Improvement of hot flushes (by more than 60%, on average) was reported by 65% of the subjects. As many as 93% of the treated women were satisfied or very satisfied with their therapy, and 97.5% of the patients declared their willingness to continue the therapy after completion of the follow-up period. More than 98% of the subjects declared very good tolerance of this therapy.

Winther et al. [13] conducted a randomised placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of Femelis Meno in relieving menopausal symptoms, in particular of hot flushes. The studied population included 54 women, who were randomised to the therapy (2 tablets of Femelis Meno daily) or placebo for 3 months. The occurrence and severity of menopausal symptoms were measured with the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). 65% of women in the group receiving Femelis Meno experienced alleviation of the hot flushes, whereas only 38% of patients from the control group receiving placebo reported improvement in this respect (p < 0.006) The number of hot flushes decreased by 27% in the Femelis Meno group, as compared to the control group (p < 0.026). Analysis of changes of 15 quality of life parameters showed a significantly better result in the group receiving Femelis Meno, as compared to the patients receiving placebo (p < 0.031). Only a few, clinically insignificant, adverse effects were noted in this study, and the tolerance profile of this product was highly rated by the patients.

In their congress report, Kimura and Gruber [14] confirmed the efficacy of a product with the same composition as Femelis Meno with respect to reduction of such menopausal symptoms as hot flushes (by 57.3%), night sweats (by 62.6%) and sleep disorders (by 54.7%). No adverse effects, including allergic ones, were observed in this study.

The argument for prescribing plant-derived therapy to alleviate menopausal symptoms, convincing to both patients and doctors, is product safety, and in particular oncological safety. Study results confirming the favourable safety profile of Femelis Meno were published in recent years. Goldstein et al. [15] assessed the effect of purified PI 82-GC FEM extract on the CYP2D6 enzyme system in an in vitro model, using human liver microsomes for this purpose. Enzymes of cytochrome P460 (CYP) take part in conversion of tamoxifen to 4-hydroxytamoxifen and other metabolites of this drug. The CYP2D6 isoenzyme plays a particular role in this process. As therapy with tamoxifen frequently causes or exacerbates the vasomotor symptoms of the menopausal type, the SSRIs are usually used to alleviate these symptoms. As this pertains most frequently to patients treated for breast cancer, the use of oestrogens for this purpose is contraindicated. Unfortunately, the SSRIs are strong CYP2D6 inhibitors and thus they decrease the anti-oestrogenic efficacy of tamoxifen. The study by Goldstein et al. is part of a trend, intensively explored in recent years, of searching for non-hormonal therapeutic alternatives for patients suffering from menopausal symptoms who have contraindications to oestrogens. The concentration of the PI 82-GC FEM extracts used in this study was five times as high as the dose used in Femelis Meno. The enzymatic activity of CYP2D6 was inhibited by PI 82-GC FEM to a minimal extent (6.5 to 10.7%), as compared to a classical CYP2D6 inhibitor, quinidine, which reduced the activity of this enzyme by more than 84% at a concentration of 500 nM. The authors of this study conclude that the use of the product containing the studied extract in patients treated with tamoxifen who suffer from vasomotor symptoms represents a safe non-hormonal therapeutic option.

Hellström and Muntzing [9] published a study in which they used chromatography to determine the composition of PI 82-GC FEM with respect to presence of phytoestrogenic substances. Additionally, the oestrogenic effect of these extracts was assessed by an uterotrophic assay in an animal model. Very low, biologically ineffective, amounts of daidzein and genistein were found in the studied extracts. As far as formononetin, genistein and biochanin A are concerned, even trace amounts of these isoflavonoids were not found. PI 82-GC FEM did not induce any increase of the uterus weight in immature female rats, even at a high dose (500 mg/kg–1 day–1) of the extract. The results of this study provide evidence that the efficacy of Femelis Meno is not related to the presence of phytoestrogens in its composition or to oestrogenic activity of the extracts contained in this product, which qualifies this product as a non-hormonal phytotherapeutic.

Munoz [16] performed a study that assessed the affinity of the extracts contained in Femelis Meno to the oestrogen receptors. This study showed absence of the oestrogenic effect of the studied plant extracts mediated by oestrogen receptors alpha and beta. Clinical confirmation of this observation was provided by the research of Winther et al. [13], who did not find any significant differences in follicle-stimulating hormone, oestrogen, testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin levels in patients receiving a product with a composition similar to Femelis Meno. Munoz [16] and Seeger et al. [17] found that the extracts contained in Femelis Meno do not stimulate proliferation of breast cancer cells.

The results of this study showed the significant improvement of general sexual life quality after 3 months of treatment with Femelis Meno. The explanation of this finding is difficult. The impaired quality of sexual life in the menopausal period has very complex and multifactorial determinants. Systemic oestrogen deficiency as well as hormone dependent reduction in vaginal and vulvar blood flow cause vaginal dryness and irritation, and promote infections, which leads to discomfort during intercourse. Such non-somatic factors as a successful relationship, support in marriage, sexual awareness and lack of fear in relation to sex have significant positive effects on sexual activity during menopause [18].

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that Femelis Meno should be taken into consideration when selecting a therapeutic strategy in cases of menopausal symptoms significantly worsening quality of life, in particular in patients for whom the safety of the therapy is an important issue.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interests.

Table 3

Numbers of hot flushes in the studied women after one month and after three months of the use of Femelis Meno (n = 50)

Hot flushes		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Number of episodes of hot flushes (moderate/severe)	Visit 2	5.5	0.0	34.0	–3.008
	Visit 3	2.0	0.0	22.5	p = 0.003

Table 7

Severity of menopausal symptoms after one month and after three months of use of Femelis Meno (n = 50) – results of examination with the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS)

Menopausal symptoms		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Hot flushes, sweating	Visit 2	2.0	0.0	4.0	–3.497
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.000
Heart problems	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	–3.578
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.000
Sleeping disorders	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	–0.486
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	4.0	p = 0.627
Depressive mood	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	–2.749
	Visit 3	0.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.006
Irritability	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	4.0	–2.012
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.044
Anxiety	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	–3.573
	Visit 3	0.0	0.0	2.0	p = 0.000
Physical and mental exhaustion	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	–2.653
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.008
Sexual problems	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	4.0	–1.941
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.052
Bladder problems	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	4.0	–3.218
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.001
Vaginal dryness	Visit 2	2.0	0.0	4.0	–2.333
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	3.0	p = 0.020
Joint and muscle discomfort	Visit 2	1.0	0.0	3.0	–3.217
	Visit 3	1.0	0.0	2.0	p = 0.001

Response rating: 0 – absent, 1 – mild, 2 – moderate, 3 – severe, 4 – very severe

Table 10

Differences between sexual life quality parameters in the studied women after one and three months of use of Femelis Meno (n = 50) – results of examination with the Female Sexual Functioning Inventory (FSFI)

Parameters of sexual life quality		Median	Minimum	Maximum	Wilcoxon test
Desire	Visit 2	3.6	1.2	6.0	1.407
	Visit 3	4.2	1.2	6.0	p = 0.160
Arousal	Visit 2	3.9	0.0	5.4	3.021
	Visit 3	4.8	1.5	6.0	p = 0.003
Lubrication	Visit 2	3.9	0.0	5.7	1.890
	Visit 3	4.8	0.0	6.0	p = 0.059
Orgasm	Visit 2	4.0	0.0	5.6	1.995
	Visit 3	4.4	0.0	6.0	p = 0.046
Sexual satisfaction	Visit 2	4.0	1.6	6.0	1.356
	Visit 3	4.8	0.8	6.0	p = 0.175
Pain	Visit 2	3.6	0.0	6.0	1.874
	Visit 3	4.8	0.0	6.0	p = 0.061
Total	Visit 2	23.2	3.7	32.8	1.917
	Visit 3	26.8	3.5	35.6	p = 0.055