| Literature DB >> 30150579 |
Alexandru Gavan1, Liora Colobatiu2, Andrei Mocan3, Anca Toiu4, Ioan Tomuta5.
Abstract
This study describes an innovative in-line near-infrared (NIR) process monitoring method for the quantification of the total polyphenolic content (TPC) of Ajuga genevensis dry extracts. The dry extract was obtained in a fluidized bed processor, by spraying and adsorbing a liquid extract onto an inert powder support. NIR spectra were recorded continuously during the extract's spraying process. For the calibration of the in-line TPC quantification method, samples were collected during the entire process. The TPC of each sample was assessed spectroscopically, by applying a UV-Vis reference method. The obtained values were further used in order to develop a quality OPLS prediction model by correlating them with the corresponding NIR spectra. The final dry extract registered good flowability and compressibility properties, a concentration in active principles three times higher than the one of the liquid extract and an overall process yield of 85%. The average TPC's recovery of the NIR in-line prediction method, compared with the reference UV-Vis one, was 98.7%, indicating a reliable monitoring method which provided accurate predictions of the TPC during the process, permitting a good process overview and enabling us to establish the process's end point at the exact moment when the product reaches the desired TPC concentration.Entities:
Keywords: Ajuga genevensis; dry extract; fluid bed process; in-line monitoring; microNIR; near-infrared spectroscopy; total polyphenolic content
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30150579 PMCID: PMC6225481 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23092152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Measured and near-infrared (NIR) predicted dry extract properties.
| Sample | Spectra | Process Time (Min) | Reference UV-Vis Off-Line Method (mg Gallic Acid/100 g Dry Extract) | NIR-Chemometric In-Line Method (mg Gallic Acid/100 g Dry Extract) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | 05′ | 50.94 | 54.67 | 107.33 |
| 2 | 60 | 10′ | 106.79 | 86.93 | 81.40 |
| 3 | 90 | 15′ | 168.58 | 184.30 | 109.33 |
| 4 | 120 | 20′ | 215.75 | 203.30 | 94.23 |
| 5 | 150 | 25′ | 240.44 | 237.16 | 98.64 |
| 6 | 180 | 30′ | 324.81 | 340.44 | 104.81 |
| 7 | 210 | 35′ | 392.49 | 370.93 | 94.51 |
| 8 | 248 | 41′ | 469.26 | 468.05 | 99.74 |
Figure 1The raw (a) and 2nd derivative pre-processed (b) spectra registered during the fluid bed process and used for the development of the spectral prediction model.
Figure 2Loadings plot generated for the principal component analysis (PCA) model, overlapped with a preprocessed spectrum.
Figure 3Scores scatter plot obtained from the orthogonal partial least squares (OPLS) analysis of the spectra corresponding to the 8 dry extract samples.
Figure 4UV-Vis off-line measured vs. NIR in-line predicted total polyphenolic content.