Literature DB >> 30150069

Predicted quadriceps vs. quadrupled hamstring tendon graft size using 3-dimensional MRI.

William B Ashford1, Thomas H Kelly2, Russell W Chapin3, John W Xerogeanes4, Harris S Slone1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to (1) compare the predicted cross-sectional area and diameter between quadriceps tendon and quadrupled hamstring autografts, and (2) assess the predicted size of the quadriceps tendon graft in patients with hamstrings that are insufficient for use in ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 54 knee 3D MRIs was conducted. Quadriceps tendon graft area was defined as a one-centimeter wide area of quadriceps tendon, measured three centimeters above the patella perpendicular to tendon axis. Quadrupled hamstring graft area was defined as double the combined areas of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendon, measured three centimeters above the joint line perpendicular to tendon axis. Pearson correlation was used to compare the quadriceps tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts.
RESULTS: Mean cross-sectional area of quadrupled hamstring and quadriceps tendon grafts were 47.2 mm2 and 84.4 mm2 respectively. A statistically significant positive correlation exists between quadrupled hamstring graft and quadriceps tendon graft cross-sectional area (r = 0.41; p = 0.002). Nine of the 54 patients had predicted quadrupled hamstring grafts deemed insufficient for use in ACL reconstruction (<8 mm diameter). All of these patients had predicted quadriceps tendon graft diameters >8 mm.
CONCLUSION: There is a positive correlation between predicted quadriceps tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts. While 17% of patients in this series had predicted insufficient quadrupled hamstring grafts, all of the patients had predicted quadriceps tendon grafts of sufficient size for ACL reconstruction. Quadriceps tendon grafts are a viable alternative in patients at-risk for insufficient quadrupled hamstring grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Autograft; Hamstring graft; Quadriceps graft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30150069     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Implications for Early Postoperative Care After Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hunnicutt; Harris S Slone; John W Xerogeanes
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the quadriceps tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher P Emerson; Jessica M Bernstein; Fong Nham; Spencer Barnhill; Michael G Baraga; Eric Bogner; Jean Jose
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction related complications: 2D and 3D high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Uma Thakur; Vaibhav Gulati; Jay Shah; David Tietze; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Ultrasound Imaging in Predicting the Autograft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tsung-Min Lee; Wei-Ting Wu; Yi-Hsiang Chiu; Ke-Vin Chang; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  Quadriceps tendon autograft for pediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in promising postoperative function and rates of return to sports: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Zakharia; Darius L Lameire; Hassaan Abdel Khalik; Jeffrey Kay; Abhilash Uddandam; Kanto Nagai; Yuichi Hoshino; Darren de Sa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.114

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.