| Literature DB >> 30149570 |
Chrysanthi Papadaki1, Wei Li2, Alexander M Korsunsky3.
Abstract
The ability to predict the sizes of secondary and tertiary γ' precipitate is of particular importance for the development and use of polycrystalline nickel-based superalloys in demanding applications, since the size of the precipitate exerts a strong effect on the mechanical properties. Many studies have been devoted to the development and application of sophisticated numerical models that incorporate the influence of chemical composition, concentration gradients, and interfacial properties on precipitate size and morphology. In the present study, we choose a different approach, concentrating on identifying a correlation between the mean secondary and tertiary γ' size and the cooling rate from solution treatment temperature. The data are collected using the precipitate size distribution analysis from high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. This correlation is expressed in the form of a power law, established using experimental measurement data and rationalized using a re-derivation of McLean's theory for precipitate growth, based on well-established thermodynamic principles. Specifically, McLean's model is recast to consider the effect of cooling rate. The derived model captures the correlation correctly despite its simplicity, and is able to predict the mean secondary and tertiary γ' precipitate size in a nickel superalloy, without complex modeling.Entities:
Keywords: cooling rate; kinetics; nickel superalloy; phase transformation; precipitation; size distribution; γ′ precipitate size
Year: 2018 PMID: 30149570 PMCID: PMC6164823 DOI: 10.3390/ma11091528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of Alloy 11 (wt %) [12].
| Ni | Co | Cr | Ta | W | Al | Ti | Mo | Nb | Fe | Mn | Si | Zr | C | Bo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bal | 15.06 | 12.69 | 4.77 | 3.22 | 3.16 | 2.84 | 2.14 | 1.44 | 0.95 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.057 | 0.027 | 0.023 |
Figure 1Examples of backscattered scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images used for precipitate size analysis: (a) for tertiary gamma prime, the magnification was ≈×170,000 and (b) for secondary gamma prime, the magnification used was ≈×21,000.
Figure 2Backscattered SEM images of the microstructures developed in the samples after cooling from solution temperature at each cooling rate given. The magnification used was ≈×20,000 for the first row and ≈×50,000 for the second.
Figure 3Histograms of γ′ size for each cooling rate under consideration. The continuous curves represent fits to the experimental data using Equation (1).
Parameters for the double-Gaussian fit for each cooling rate.
| Cooling Rate (°C/s) |
|
|
|
|
|
| R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.2 | 66.98 | 362.8 | 12.79 | 175.5 | 414.2 | 50.94 | 0.9757 |
| 0.7 | 36.5 | 216.4 | 10.72 | 90.26 | 381.7 | 119.6 | 0.989 |
| 2 | 27.34 | 175.8 | 9.224 | 82.34 | 236.7 | 97.95 | 0.9854 |
| 4 | 13.37 | 96.83 | 1.806 | 52.17 | 116.8 | 116.1 | 0.8986 |
Figure 4The variation in secondary and tertiary γ′ mean precipitate size with the cooling rate.
Figure 5Illustration of the overall transformation rate as a function of temperature. The dashed line illustrates the parabolic approximation for the temperature dependence of the rate of the overall transformation. T: Assumed to be the minimum temperature below which the diffusivity is too slow for the transformation. T: Critical temperature for maximum overall transformation rate. T: Equilibrium transformation temperature for nucleation.