Literature DB >> 30148969

Very-low-load resistance exercise in the upper body with and without blood flow restriction: cardiovascular outcomes.

J Grant Mouser1, Kevin T Mattocks2, Scott J Dankel3, Samuel L Buckner4, Matthew B Jessee5, Zachary W Bell3, Takashi Abe3, Jeremy P Loenneke3.   

Abstract

It is proposed that, at very low loads, greater blood flow restriction (BFR) pressures might be required for muscular adaptation to occur. The cardiovascular and hyperemic response to very low loads combined with relative levels of BFR is unknown. Ninety-seven participants were recruited and assigned to 1 of 4 exercise conditions: 15% of 1-repetition maximum (1RM) without BFR (15/00), 15% 1RM with BFR at 40% of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) (15/40), 15% of 1RM with BFR at 80% of AOP (15/80), and 70% of 1RM without BFR (70/00). Participants performed 4 sets of unilateral biceps curls. Blood pressure was measured before and after exercise; brachial artery blood flow was measured before exercise, following the second set, and 1 min following exercise. Systolic blood pressure increased following exercise in all conditions (+10 (11) mm Hg, P < 0.0005). Diastolic pressure increased in all but 70/00 (+2 (11) mm Hg, P = 0.107). Brachial artery blood flow increased following the second set of exercise in all but 15/80 (+43.4 (76.8) mL·min-1, P = 0.348). One minute following exercise and cuff deflation, there were no differences in blood flow between conditions (P > 0.05). Similarly, artery diameter was increased in all conditions except 15/80 (+0.002 (0.041) cm, P = 0.853) following the second set, and increased in all conditions by 1 min following exercise (P < 0.05). In conclusion, exercise-induced hyperemia is blunted with increasing pressures of BFR. There is a modest increase in blood pressure at very low loads of resistance exercise in the upper body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood flow; débit sanguin; entraînement à l’occlusion; exercise-induced hyperemia; hyperhémie de l’exercice; occlusion training; ultrason; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30148969     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  6 in total

1.  Cardiovascular and Muscular Response to NO LOAD Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  Wenyuan G Zhu; Noam Yitzchaki; Tayla E Kuehne; Ryo Kataoka; Kevin T Mattocks; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Limb Occlusion Pressure: A Method to Assess Changes in Systolic Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Zachary W Bell; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; J Grant Mouser; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Knee extension with blood flow restriction: Impact of cuff pressure on hemodynamics.

Authors:  Tyler J Singer; Jon Stavres; Steven J Elmer; Matthew A Kilgas; Brandon S Pollock; Sarah G Kearney; John McDaniel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The Evolution of Blood Flow Restricted Exercise.

Authors:  Eduardo D S Freitas; Murat Karabulut; Michael G Bemben
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  The acute muscular response following a novel form of pulsed direct current stimulation (Neubie) or traditional resistance exercise.

Authors:  Ecaterina Vasenina; Ryo Kataoka; William B Hammert; Adam H Ibrahim; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.864

6.  The Systemic Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bradley C Miller; Alexander W Tirko; Justin M Shipe; Olivia R Sumeriski; Kelley Moran
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-08-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.