| Literature DB >> 30147748 |
Yao Xiao1, Xuejun He1, Yemaiza Ojeda-Lassalle1, Charleson Poovaiah1,2, Heather D Coleman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expression of glycosyl hydrolases in lignocellulosic biomass has been proposed as an alternative to improve efficiency of cellulosic ethanol production. In planta production of hyperthermophilic hydrolytic enzymes could prevent the detrimental effects often seen resulting from the expression of recombinant mesophilic enzymes to plant hosts. Utilizing lignocellulosic feedstocks to produce hyperthermophilic hydrolases provides additional benefits for ethanol production in the way of transgenic feedstocks serving as both enzyme providers and cellulosic substrates.Entities:
Keywords: Biofuel production; Cell wall composition; Hyperthermophilic cellulase; Saccharification; Transgenic poplar
Year: 2018 PMID: 30147748 PMCID: PMC6094567 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-018-1224-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Expression of TnCelB in transgenic poplar lines. a Relative transcript level of TnCelB in leaf and developing xylem in transgenic events and WT measured by qPCR using reference genes (UBQ11 and EF1β) as the internal control; b MUCase activities of total soluble protein (TSP) from leaf tissue of transgenic events over a temperature range (25–100 °C); c MUCase activity of TSP extracted from leaf tissue and developing xylem of transgenic events and WT at 100 °C; and d CMCase activity of TSP extracted from leaf tissue and developing xylem of transgenic events and WT at 100 °C. The enzymatic activities of transgenic events were normalized to WT levels. Each value represents mean of technical triplicates of three individual plants per event with the standard error
Fig. 2Growth comparison of 4-month-old greenhouse-grown transgenic TnCelB-overexpressing poplar and WT control. A Stem diameter; B plant height; C leaf number; and D length of internode. Each bar represents mean of five individual plants. Different letters represent significant differences among the samples (p ≤ 0.05) as calculated by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc analysis
Fig. 3Comparison of cell wall composition and cellulose crystallinity of untreated and heat-treated wood for each event. Structural sugar monomers including A arabinose; B xylose; C galactose; D mannose; E glucose; and F Klason lignin; G acetone extractives; and H cellulose crystallinity index of untreated and heat-treated stem in each event. Each bar represents mean of technical duplicates of three individual plants per event with the standard error. Different letters represent significant differences among the samples (p ≤ 0.05) as calculated by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc analysis
Fig. 4Enzymatic saccharification efficiency of transgenic events and WT. Glucan conversion rates of untreated biomass (A), heat-treated biomass (B), and heat-treated biomass followed by a mild acid pretreatment (C). Liquid hydrolysate was collected at different timepoints over 72–120 h, and glucose measured by ion-exchange chromatography. D Comparison of glucan conversion rates at 72 h of untreated biomass, heat-treated biomass, and pretreated biomass of transgenic events and WT. E Comparison of released glucose concentration of CaMV-4 and WT among three treatments. Each bar represents mean of three individual plants per event with the standard error. Different letters represent significant differences among the samples (p ≤ 0.05) as calculated by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc analysis
Carbohydrate content in pretreatment hydrolysate (% biomass)
| Event | Arabinose | Galactose | Glucose | Xylose | Mannose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaMV-1 | 0.83 ± 0.13 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 5.37 ± 0.76 | 9.92 ± 0.30 | 0.61 ± 0.02 |
| CaMV-3 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 4.61 ± 0.58 | 9.19 ± 0.66 | 0.60 ± 0.09 |
| CaMV-4 | 0.97 ± 0.06 | 1.32 ± 0.11 | 9.22 ± 0.33** | 8.56 ± 0.20 | 0.16 ± 0.02** |
| CaMV-5 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 6.5 ± 0.21 | 10.01 ± 0.05* | 0.52 ± 0.05 |
| WT | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 5.00 ± 1.01 | 9.22 ± 0.18 | 0.46 ± 0.07 |
Asterisks indicate significant differences in comparison with WT. *p < 0.05, **p<0.01 (one-way ANOVA), n = 3
Fig. 5Schematic representation of predicted model of CaMV-4 event undergoing heat treatment, pretreatment, and enzymatic saccharification