We took great pleasure in reading the article by Aldosari et al1 about the learning style preferences of dental students. The authors showed that high-performing students preferred a multimodal style of learning. We would like to raise a few points that we feel would further guide the faculty in identifying ways of tailoring their teaching methods to the learning needs of their students.It was interesting to note that the authors conducted a questionnaire using the VARK (Visual, Auditory, Read/write, Kinesthetic) model of learning. Belief in the VARK model is commonplace; 93% of British teachers believed that students learnt better when they received information in their preferred learning styles.2 Similar results have been observed in other countries.However, there is currently no reliable evidence to support the use of VARK learning style preferences as an education tool.3 Individuals may prefer one or more learning styles, but there is no available evidence to suggest that matching studying methods to preferred learning styles improves educational outcomes.4The prescriptive nature of this education tool may even be detrimental to learning as students may not engage with study techniques they perceive as being more suited to a different learning style. Similarly, students may also develop a false sense of confidence in their ability to master subjects, which they perceive match their style. Furthermore, learning styles may even deter students from techniques, which have been demonstrated to be effective.5 Examples of evidence-based learning tools that have been demonstrated to be useful include the “testing effect” and “spaced repetition”.We feel that the study findings are particularly interesting as they are supportive of a pedagogical approach that shifts away from conventional VARK learning style preferences. Students with higher grade point averages were more likely to prefer quadmodal or bimodal learning styles.1 We might expect this as students with higher academic attainment may have opted for more effective and broad-based study techniques. Similarly, we note that second-year students prefer bimodal over unimodal learning style preferences. Having successfully completed their first year at university, second-year students would have had more learning experiences at university and more time to identify an approach that works best for them.Therefore, we agree with the authors of this study that encouraging students to use a multimodal approach would improve their learning preferences, but we feel that their study further highlights a need for educators to move away from identifying a learning preference for students to use and toward encouraging students to realize that the integration of multiple learning styles will help enhance their learning.5