Muriel Coupaye1, Hélène Legardeur2, Ouidad Sami3, Daniela Calabrese4, Laurent Mandelbrot2, Séverine Ledoux3. 1. Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Intégré Nord Francilien de prise en charge de l'Obésité (CINFO), Hôpital Louis Mourier (AP-HP), Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes, France. Electronic address: muriel.coupaye@aphp.fr. 2. Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital Louis Mourier (AP-HP), Colombes and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France. 3. Service des Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Intégré Nord Francilien de prise en charge de l'Obésité (CINFO), Hôpital Louis Mourier (AP-HP), Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Colombes, France. 4. Service de Chirurgie, Centre Intégré Nord Francilien de prise en charge de l'Obésité (CINFO), Hôpital Louis Mourier (AP-HP), Colombes and Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence on whether sleeve gastrectomy (SG), which induces fewer nutritional deficiencies than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), also affects fetal growth (FG). OBJECTIVES: To compare neonatal outcomes after RYGB and SG and to assess the impact of maternal nutritional alterations on FG after both procedures. SETTING: University Hospital, France. METHODS: Women with singleton pregnancies who had at least 1 nutritional evaluation in our institution between 2004 and 2017 were included. FG was assessed with birth weight (BW) and BW-Z score (adjusted for sex and term), and maternal nutritional deficiencies were defined according to standard and pregnancy-specific norms. RESULTS: During the study period 123 pregnancies were included, 77 after RYGB and 46 after SG. Weight loss was higher after RYGB than after SG (45.6 ± 12.4 versus 39.5 ± 13.7 kg, P = .02), but mean weight before pregnancy and weight gain during pregnancy were similar. Mean BW (3026 ± 677 versus 3162 ± 712 g), mean BW Z-score and incidence of small for gestational age (24% versus 19%) were not significantly different after RYGB and SG. Mean number of nutritional deficiencies during the second trimester was similar (2.2 ± 1.5 versus 2.1 ± 1.2 with specific norms), but the affected parameters differed between procedures. Urinary urea (R = .285, P = .04) was positively correlated to BW Z-score after both procedures. In contrast, serum iron parameters were negatively associated to BW Z-score. CONCLUSION: FG restriction occurs after both SG and RYGB. FG after bariatric surgery is positively associated with protein supply and negatively correlated with maternal iron status.
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence on whether sleeve gastrectomy (SG), which induces fewer nutritional deficiencies than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), also affects fetal growth (FG). OBJECTIVES: To compare neonatal outcomes after RYGB and SG and to assess the impact of maternal nutritional alterations on FG after both procedures. SETTING: University Hospital, France. METHODS:Women with singleton pregnancies who had at least 1 nutritional evaluation in our institution between 2004 and 2017 were included. FG was assessed with birth weight (BW) and BW-Z score (adjusted for sex and term), and maternal nutritional deficiencies were defined according to standard and pregnancy-specific norms. RESULTS: During the study period 123 pregnancies were included, 77 after RYGB and 46 after SG. Weight loss was higher after RYGB than after SG (45.6 ± 12.4 versus 39.5 ± 13.7 kg, P = .02), but mean weight before pregnancy and weight gain during pregnancy were similar. Mean BW (3026 ± 677 versus 3162 ± 712 g), mean BW Z-score and incidence of small for gestational age (24% versus 19%) were not significantly different after RYGB and SG. Mean number of nutritional deficiencies during the second trimester was similar (2.2 ± 1.5 versus 2.1 ± 1.2 with specific norms), but the affected parameters differed between procedures. Urinary urea (R = .285, P = .04) was positively correlated to BW Z-score after both procedures. In contrast, serum iron parameters were negatively associated to BW Z-score. CONCLUSION: FG restriction occurs after both SG and RYGB. FG after bariatric surgery is positively associated with protein supply and negatively correlated with maternal iron status.
Authors: Seda Sancak; Özgen Çeler; Elif Çırak; Aziz Bora Karip; M Tumiçin Aydın; Nuriye Esenbulut; M Mahir Fersahoğlu; Hasan Altun; Kemal Memişoğlu Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Gülen Yerlikaya-Schatten; Michael Feichtinger; Tina Stopp; Evelyn A Huhn; Kinga Chalubinski; Peter Husslein; Wolfgang Eppel; Christian Schatten; Christian S Göbl Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Anna Różańska-Walędziak; Paweł Bartnik; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Krzysztof Czajkowski; Maciej Walędziak; Andrzej Kwiatkowski Journal: Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 1.195
Authors: Katinka M Snoek; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen; René A Klaassen; Joop S E Laven; Sam Schoenmakers Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Maciej Walędziak; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Paweł Bartnik; Krzysztof Czajkowski; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Anna Różańska-Walędziak Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anna Różańska-Walędziak; Maciej Walędziak; Paweł Bartnik; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Michał Janik; Piotr Kowalewski; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Krzysztof Czajkowski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-02 Impact factor: 4.241