Literature DB >> 30146046

Choose Your Words Wisely: The Impact of Message Framing on Patients' Responses to Treatment Advice.

Paul Glare1, Ilona Fridman2, Claire E Ashton-James3.   

Abstract

Other people's words can have a powerful influence on how we interpret our environment, what we expect and experience, what we value, how we feel, what we choose, and how we behave. Placebo (and nocebo) effects are a dramatic example of this. The way in which healthcare professionals discuss, describe, and inform patients about the characteristic effects of a given disease and it prevention, diagnosis and treatment influence patients' feelings and expectations which in turn affects their psychobiological responses to, and subjective experiences and outcomes of the disease and its treatment effects. The effect of clinicians' words on patients' responses to treatments and procedures, both active and inert or sham is nothing less than incredible. The way in which information about treatment effects is delivered to patients can even reverse the clinically proven effects of an active treatment, or increase the adverse effects of it. In this chapter, we begin by presenting the data on the impact of message framing on affect and expectations of health care in experimental situations followed by the evidence that indicates how various patient, disease and clinician related factors modify framing effects in the clinic. Finally we discuss how framing effects affect clinical practice. They can be leveraged to enhance placebo effects and minimize nocebo effects. They can provide strategies to assist shared-decision making in the face of complex uncertainty. Going forward, automation of health care and artificial intelligence may change the delivery of health care but patients will continue to be humans seeking health gains while avoiding health losses and how the information is presented will always be susceptible to framing effects.
© 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Framing effects; Message framing; Patient decision making; Patient-centered communication; Placebo and nocebo effects; Prospect theory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30146046     DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol        ISSN: 0074-7742            Impact factor:   3.230


  4 in total

1.  Preface: Part II: The Fascinating Mechanisms and Implications of the Placebo Effect.

Authors:  Luana Colloca
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.230

2.  "There Are Hills and Valleys": Experiences of Parenting a Son With X-Linked Retinoschisis.

Authors:  Amy Turriff; Rosalie Nolen; Celeste D'Amanda; Barbara Biesecker; Catherine Cukras; Paul A Sieving
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 3.  What can clinicians do to improve outcomes across psychiatric treatments: a conceptual review of non-specific components.

Authors:  S Priebe; M Conneely; R McCabe; V Bird
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 6.892

4.  Awareness of family health history in a predominantly young adult population.

Authors:  Sarina Madhavan; Emily Bullis; Rachel Myers; Chris J Zhou; Elise M Cai; Anu Sharma; Shreya Bhatia; Lori A Orlando; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.