Literature DB >> 30146017

Prescribing Opioids as an Incentive to Retain Patients in Medical Care: A Qualitative Investigation into Clinician Awareness and Perceptions.

Kasey R Claborn, Elizabeth R Aston, Jane Champion, Kate M Guthrie.   

Abstract

HIV treatment retention remains a significant public health concern. Our qualitative analysis used emergent data from a larger HIV treatment study to explore clinician perspectives on prescribing opioids to incentivize retention in HIV care. Data from individual interviews with 29 HIV and substance use clinicians were analyzed using thematic analysis. Prescribing opioids as a retention strategy emerged as a theme. Nine of 11 HIV clinicians reported prior knowledge of this practice; only one of 12 substance use clinicians indicated prior knowledge. Positive perceptions included: harm reduction approach, increased appointment attendance, and sustained engagement in HIV care. Negative perceptions included: addiction potential, increased engagement not leading to better health outcomes, and prescriptions becoming the appointment focus. Some clinicians used prescriptions as a strategy to improve treatment retention, which may be particularly problematic in light of the current opioid epidemic. Understanding motives, outcomes, and clinical decision-making processes is needed.
Copyright © 2018 Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; addiction; adherence; engagement; opioids; prescribing behavior; treatment retention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30146017      PMCID: PMC6348082          DOI: 10.1016/j.jana.2018.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care        ISSN: 1055-3290            Impact factor:   1.354


  16 in total

1.  Contingency management: what it is and why psychiatrists should want to use it.

Authors:  Nancy M Petry
Journal:  Psychiatrist       Date:  2011-05

Review 2.  Interventions to improve retention in HIV primary care: a systematic review of U.S. studies.

Authors:  Darrel H Higa; Gary Marks; Nicole Crepaz; Adrian Liau; Cynthia M Lyles
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  When human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment goals conflict with guideline-based opioid prescribing: A qualitative study of HIV treatment providers.

Authors:  Joanna L Starrels; Deena Peyser; Lorlette Haughton; Aaron Fox; Jessica S Merlin; Julia H Arnsten; Chinazo O Cunningham
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.716

4.  Chronic pain disorders in HIV primary care: clinical characteristics and association with healthcare utilization.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Jiao; Eric So; Jebakaran Jebakumar; Mary Catherine George; David M Simpson; Jessica Robinson-Papp
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Challenges in the Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Engagement Along the HIV Care Continuum in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathryn A Risher; Sunaina Kapoor; Alice Moji Daramola; Gabriela Paz-Bailey; Jacek Skarbinski; Kate Doyle; Kate Shearer; David Dowdy; Eli Rosenberg; Patrick Sullivan; Maunank Shah
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2017-07

6.  Efficacy of a brief case management intervention to link recently diagnosed HIV-infected persons to care.

Authors:  Lytt I Gardner; Lisa R Metsch; Pamela Anderson-Mahoney; Anita M Loughlin; Carlos del Rio; Steffanie Strathdee; Stephanie L Sansom; Harvey A Siegal; Alan E Greenberg; Scott D Holmberg
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Voucher incentives improve linkage to and retention in care among HIV-infected drug users in Chennai, India.

Authors:  Sunil Suhas Solomon; Aylur K Srikrishnan; Canjeevaram K Vasudevan; Santhanam Anand; Muniratnam Suresh Kumar; Pachamuthu Balakrishnan; Shruti H Mehta; Suniti Solomon; Gregory M Lucas
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Linkage, engagement, and viral suppression rates among HIV-infected persons receiving care at medical case management programs in Washington, DC.

Authors:  Sarah Willis; Amanda D Castel; Tashrik Ahmed; Christie Olejemeh; Lawrence Frison; Michael Kharfen
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Substance use among HIV-infected patients engaged in primary care in the United States: findings from the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems cohort.

Authors:  Matthew J Mimiaga; Sari L Reisner; Chris Grasso; Heidi M Crane; Steven A Safren; Mari M Kitahata; Joseph E Schumacher; W Christopher Mathews; Kenneth H Mayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Vital Signs: HIV diagnosis, care, and treatment among persons living with HIV--United States, 2011.

Authors:  Heather Bradley; H Irene Hall; Richard J Wolitski; Michelle M Van Handel; Amy E Stone; Michael LaFlam; Jacek Skarbinski; Darrel H Higa; Joseph Prejean; Emma L Frazier; Roshni Patel; Ping Huang; Qian An; Ruiguang Song; Tian Tang; Linda A Valleroy
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trajectories of Self-Reported Opioid Use Among Patients With HIV Engaged in Care: Results From a National Cohort Study.

Authors:  E Jennifer Edelman; Yu Li; Declan Barry; Jennifer Brennan Braden; Stephen Crystal; Robert D Kerns; Julie R Gaither; Kirsha S Gordon; Ajay Manhapra; Jessica S Merlin; Brent A Moore; Benjamin J Oldfield; Lesley S Park; Christopher T Rentsch; Melissa Skanderson; Emily C Williams; Amy C Justice; Janet P Tate; William C Becker; Brandon D L Marshall
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.771

Review 2.  Misalignment of Stakeholder Incentives in the Opioid Crisis.

Authors:  Alireza Boloori; Bengt B Arnetz; Frederi Viens; Taps Maiti; Judith E Arnetz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.