Literature DB >> 30145927

Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

Jean-François Obadia1, David Messika-Zeitoun1, Guillaume Leurent1, Bernard Iung1, Guillaume Bonnet1, Nicolas Piriou1, Thierry Lefèvre1, Christophe Piot1, Frédéric Rouleau1, Didier Carrié1, Mohammed Nejjari1, Patrick Ohlmann1, Florence Leclercq1, Christophe Saint Etienne1, Emmanuel Teiger1, Lionel Leroux1, Nicole Karam1, Nicolas Michel1, Martine Gilard1, Erwan Donal1, Jean-Noël Trochu1, Bertrand Cormier1, Xavier Armoiry1, Florent Boutitie1, Delphine Maucort-Boulch1, Cécile Barnel1, Géraldine Samson1, Patrice Guerin1, Alec Vahanian1, Nathan Mewton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients who have chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, severe secondary mitral-valve regurgitation is associated with a poor prognosis. Whether percutaneous mitral-valve repair improves clinical outcomes in this patient population is unknown.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients who had severe secondary mitral regurgitation (defined as an effective regurgitant orifice area of >20 mm2 or a regurgitant volume of >30 ml per beat), a left ventricular ejection fraction between 15 and 40%, and symptomatic heart failure, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo percutaneous mitral-valve repair in addition to receiving medical therapy (intervention group; 152 patients) or to receive medical therapy alone (control group; 152 patients). The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure at 12 months.
RESULTS: At 12 months, the rate of the primary outcome was 54.6% (83 of 152 patients) in the intervention group and 51.3% (78 of 152 patients) in the control group (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.84; P=0.53). The rate of death from any cause was 24.3% (37 of 152 patients) in the intervention group and 22.4% (34 of 152 patients) in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.77). The rate of unplanned hospitalization for heart failure was 48.7% (74 of 152 patients) in the intervention group and 47.4% (72 of 152 patients) in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.56).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation, the rate of death or unplanned hospitalization for heart failure at 1 year did not differ significantly between patients who underwent percutaneous mitral-valve repair in addition to receiving medical therapy and those who received medical therapy alone. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and Research National Program and Abbott Vascular; MITRA-FR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01920698 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145927     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  218 in total

Review 1.  MitraClip: How Do We Reconcile the Inconsistent Findings of MITRA-FR and COAPT?

Authors:  Rina Mauricio; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Pressure Volume System for Management of Heart Failure and Valvular Heart Disease.

Authors:  Frederick G P Welt; James C Fang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Left Heart Disease: an Update.

Authors:  Mandar A Aras; Mitchell A Psotka; Teresa De Marco
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Transcatheter mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation: Evaluating the evidence.

Authors:  Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz; Patrick T O'Gara; Gennaro Giustino; Michael J Mack; Donna M Mancini; Emilia Bagiella; Judy Hung; Gorav Ailawadi; Martin B Leon; Michael A Acker; John H Alexander; Neal W Dickert; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Marissa A Miller
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  [MITRA-FR and COAPT : Why are the results so different and what are the consequences for the daily routine?]

Authors:  K Friedrichs; V Rudolph
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  [Cardioband®: Where do we stand, who are suitable patients?]

Authors:  C Frerker; T Schmidt; R Pfister; M I Körber; V Mauri; M Wösten; S Baldus
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Role of percutaneous edge-to-edge repair in secondary mitral regurgitation after MITRA-FR and COAPT : A comment by the section of AV-valve treatment of the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology (AGIK) of the German Society of Cardiology (DGK).

Authors:  Roman Pfister; J Hausleiter; P Boekstegers; H Möllmann; H Nef; V Rudolph
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed.

Authors:  Torsten Doenst; Steffen Bargenda; Hristo Kirov; Alexandros Moschovas; Sophie Tkebuchava; Rauf Safarov; Mahmoud Diab; Gloria Faerber
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Current Understanding and Surgical Options.

Authors:  Alexander Angelo Brescia; Tessa Maria Fontana Watt; Steven Frederic Bolling
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-06

Review 10.  Guide to functional mitral regurgitation: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Ramya Vajapey; Deborah Kwon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.