| Literature DB >> 30145614 |
J Tyburska-Woś1, K Nowak2, B Kieliszewska-Rokicka3.
Abstract
In many parts of Europe, the white horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum L.) has been attacked by the horse chestnut leafminer (Cameraria ohridella Deschka & Dimić), which causes premature leaf dieback. A. hippocastanum L. establishes mutualistic symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. This study involved a comparison of mature A. hippocastanum individuals susceptible to C. ohridella and individuals resistant to this insect after a one-time treatment with a chemical preparation injected into the tree trunks 7 years before the investigation began. Concentration of macronutrients in soil and the activity of soil nonspecific dehydrogenase did not differ between soils under canopies of the treated and untreated trees. Concentrations of C and N were significantly higher in leaves of the treated than those of the untreated trees. The infestation by C. ohridella and defoliation of leaves of the untreated trees did not significantly influence the frequency and intensity of AM colonization compared to the chemically treated trees, although a tendency towards higher average AM colonization of roots of the untreated trees, infested by the herbivores, than roots of the non-infested trees was observed. The results also indicated a tendency for higher biomass of fine roots per soil volume under the trees treated against C. ohridella than under the trees invaded by the insect.Entities:
Keywords: Aboveground herbivory; Arbuscular mycorrhiza; Mature trees; Soil dehydrogenase
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30145614 PMCID: PMC6311180 DOI: 10.1007/s00572-018-0862-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycorrhiza ISSN: 0940-6360 Impact factor: 3.387
Concentration of macronutrients (total N and available forms of P, K, and Mg) in soil under canopies of Aesculus hippocastanum treated with insecticide and fungicide, and under untreated trees, and in leaves of the treated and untreated trees
| Treated | Untreated | One-way analysis of variance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Macronutrients in soil under | ||||
| P (P2O5) (mg/100 g) | 18.63 (1.53) | 21.43 (2.91) | 2.16 | 0.21 |
| K (K2O) (mg/100 g) | 6.83 (1.04) | 7.66 (0.28) | 1.78 | 0.25 |
| Mg (mg/100 g) | 14.06 (3.49) | 20.00 (2.00) | 6.50 | 0.06 |
| N (%) | 0.25 (0.02) | 0.29 (0.03) | 3.35 | 0.14 |
| Macronutrients in leaves of | ||||
| P (%) | 0.19 (0.014) | 0.16 (0.02) | 3.55 | 0.13 |
| Ca (%) | 1.30 (0.07) | 1.34 (0.15) | 0.16 | 0.70 |
| Mg (%) | 0.28 (0.04) | 0.29 (0.04) | 0.02 | 0.88 |
| K (%) | 1.02 (0.08) | 1.17 (0.27) | 0.65 | 0.46 |
| C (%) | 48.55 (0.74) | 46.83 (0.26) | 14.4 | 0.01* |
| N (%) | 2.51 (0.18) | 1.92 (0.12) | 22.51 | 0.00* |
| C/N | 22.60 (2.00) | 28.44 (1.77) | 14.24 | 0.02* |
Data are means ± SE (n = 3). For the concentration of macronutrients in soil, df effect = 1 and df error = 4; for the concentration of macronutrient in leaves, df effect = 1 and df error = 4
*Significant differences
Mycorrhizal colonization of roots of Aesculus hippocastanum L. trees annually defoliated because of infestation by Cameraria ohridella (untreated trees) and of trees that have been treated with one-time trunk injection chemical therapy (treated trees) in two sampling times (in 2012, on May 5 and October 5), and the interactions between the treatment and season on mycorrhizal colonization
| Mycorrhizal colonization | Two-way analysis of variance | May 5, 2012 | October 5, 2012 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor |
|
| Treated | Untreated | Treated | Untreated | |
| F% | Treatment | 1.87 | 0.19 | 84.02 | 70.69 | 86.80 | 86.38 |
| Season | 3.40 | 0.09 | (13.29) | (15.72) | (12.66) | (13.29) | |
| Treatment × season | 1.62 | 0.23 | |||||
| M% | Treatment | 4.41 | 0.06 | 1.68 | 4.03 | 2.29 | 4.08 |
| Season | 0.36 | 0.56 | (0.79) | (4.16) | (1.67) | (3.10) | |
| Treatment × season | 0.05 | 0.83 | |||||
| m% | Treatment | 4.02 | 0.07 | 1.95 | 5.10 | 3.64 | 4.57 |
| Season | 0.31 | 0.58 | (0.76) | (4.64) | (1.86) | (3.22) | |
| Treatment × season | 0.03 | 0.86 | |||||
| A% | Treatment | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Season | 2.80 | 0.12 | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.02) | (0.05) | |
| Treatment × season | 0.72 | 0.41 | |||||
| a% | Treatment | 0.08 | 0.78 | 1.10 | 0.41 | 1.02 | 1.27 |
| Season | 1.59 | 0.23 | (2.66) | (0.81) | (1.29) | (2.00) | |
| Treatment × season | 0.57 | 0.47 | |||||
F% = the frequency of mycorrhizal colonization of roots; M% = the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in the root system; m% = the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization in colonized root fragments; A% = the arbuscular abundance in the root system; a% = the arbuscular abundance in colonized root fragments. Data are means ± SE (n = 4); df effect = 1; df error = 12