Literature DB >> 30145281

The reasonable drainage option after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.

Lin-Kang Xiao1, Ji-Feng Xiang1, Kun Wu1, Xiang Fu1, Ming-You Zheng1, Xiao-Xue Song1, Wei Xie2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a reasonable drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.
METHODS: Data of 350 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were divided into three groups according to different drainage types after LCBDE, including T-tube group with 116 cases, primary closure (PC) group with 114 cases and stent insertion group with 120 cases. Operative parameters and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The operative time was no significant difference between the T-tube group (106.71 ± 5.19 min), PC group (105.46 ± 5.77 min) and stent insertion group (106.88 ± 5.91 min) (F = 2.175, P = 0.115). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stent insertion group (5.62 ± 0.70 d) than in the T-tube group (7.79 ± 0.85 d) and PC group (7.60 ± 0.80 d) (F = 279.649, P = 0.000). The hospitalization cost was significantly less in the stent insertion group (19,432.78 ± 661.74 yuan) than in the T-tube group (22,059.90 ± 697.98 yuan) and PC group (21,927.20 ± 772.02 yuan) (F = 512.492, P = 0.000). The incidence of postoperative biliary-specific complications was 2.59% (3/116 cases) in the T-tube group, 2.63% (3/114 cases) in the PC group, and 0% (0/120 cases) in the stent insertion group, but this difference was not statistically significant (χ2 = 3.177, P = 0.204). The return to normal levels of postoperative liver function tests (LFTs) was significantly faster in the stent insertion group and T-tube group than in the PC group (P < 0.05). The number of 314 patients were followed up for a median time of 20 months (range from 1-48 months), and no biliary stricture, cholangitis or stone recurrence occurred in these patients during that time.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent insertion shows better results when compared with T-tube drainage and primary duct closure in terms of postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost. It is the prior option for the choledochotomy closure after LCBDE in suitable patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary stent; Choledocholithiasis; LCBDE; Primary closure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145281     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2210-7401            Impact factor:   2.947


  5 in total

1.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Taifeng Zhu; Haoming Lin; Jian Sun; Chao Liu; Rui Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Comparison of Primary Suture and T-Tube Drainage After Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Intraoperative Choledochoscopy in the Treatment of Secondary Common Bile Duct Stones: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Yifeng Yin; Kai He; Xianming Xia
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 1.766

3.  Safety and efficacy of emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients with complicated acute cholangitis.

Authors:  Baoxing Jia; Zhe Jin; Wei Han; Yahui Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison on the Efficacy of Three Duct Closure Methods after Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ancheng Qin; Jianwu Wu; Zhiming Qiao; Min Zhai; Yijie Lu; Bo Huang; Xinwei Jiang; Xingsheng Lu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-20

5.  Comparative study of three common bile duct closure techniques after choledocholithotomy: safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Mohammed Ahmed Omar; Alaa Ahmed Redwan; Marwa Nasrelden Alansary
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.