Literature DB >> 30145095

A Single-Surgeon Retrospective and Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penuma Silicone Sleeve Implant for Elective Cosmetic Correction of the Flaccid Penis.

James J Elist1, Robert Valenzuela2, Joel Hillelsohn3, Tom Feng1, Alireza Hosseini4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Silicone blocks and sleeves are simple devices used in cosmetic surgery. They are generally viewed as safe and effective; however, there is little information on their use in the penis. AIM: This study evaluates a large single-surgeon series using a novel silicone sleeve penile implant (Penuma) to cosmetically correct the flaccid penis.
METHODS: 526 patients underwent elective cosmetic penile surgery using a silicone sleeve penile implant between 2009 and 2014. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis, and study consent was obtained from 400 patients. Penile circumference was measured before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 30-90 days after the implant surgery. Using the nonvalidated Augmentation Phalloplasty Patient Selection and Satisfaction Inventory (APPSSI), changes in self-confidence, self-esteem, and satisfaction scores were assayed 6-8 weeks postoperatively. Scores were again assayed 2-6 years postoperatively in 77% of patients. The questionnaires rated patient self-confidence, self-esteem, and satisfaction as very low, low, medium, high, or very high. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Outcomes include changes in penile measurements; changes in APPSSI satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-esteem scores; and incidences of adverse events.
RESULTS: In the 400 patients, the implantation of the Penuma silicone implant increased midshaft circumference from an average of 8.5 ± 1.2 cm to 13.4 ± 1.9 cm (56.7% increase; P < .001). A 2-category improvement in self-confidence and self-esteem was noted in 83% of patients 6-8 weeks postoperatively. On long-term follow-up (2-6 years; mean 4 years), 72% patients remained improved (2-category improvement in APPSSI scoring), and 81% of subjects reported "high" or "very high" levels of satisfaction. The most frequently reported postoperative complications were seroma (4.8%), scar formation (4.5%), and infection (3.3%). No patients reported any changes in sexual function, erections, or ejaculation. 3% experienced adverse events necessitating device removal. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The Penuma silicone implant can help patients cosmetically correct the penis with increased flaccid penile girth and achieve enhanced self-confidence and self-esteem over the short- and long term. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include the large number of subjects (400 men) and the long-term follow-up period (2-6 years). Limitations include the retrospective and single-surgeon (inventor) nature of the study; the presence of 126 non-consenting subjects, potentially impacting the complication rate; and the APPSSI's lack of validation.
CONCLUSION: Retrospective analysis of 400 men electing to have penile cosmetic correction with the Penuma device demonstrates improvements in girth (56.7% increase) and high and sustained patient satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-esteem with minimal and manageable adverse events. Elist JJ, Valenzuela R, Hillelsohn J, et al. A Single-Surgeon, Retrospective, and Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the Penuma Silicone Sleeve Implant for Elective Cosmetic Correction of the Flaccid Penis. J Sex Med 2018;15:1216-1223.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cosmetic; Erect Penis; Flaccid Penis; Implant; Penile Girth; Penile Size; Penuma; Phalloplasty; Self-Confidence; Siilicone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145095     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

Review 1.  History and future perspectives of male aesthetic genital surgery.

Authors:  Claudia Zaccaro; David Subirà; Iñigo López-Diez; Celeste Manfredi; Julmar Paul Ascensios-Vargas; Ignacio Moncada-Iribarren
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Carlo Bettocchi; Paulo Egydio; Chris Love; Daniar Osmonov; Sean Park; David Ralph; Zhong Cheng Xin; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 16.430

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary approach and management of patients who seek medical advice for penile size concerns: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nicolò Schifano; Omer Onur Cakir; Fabio Castiglione; Francesco Montorsi; Giulio Garaffa
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 4.  Future considerations in prosthetic urology.

Authors:  Landon Trost
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  The Augmenta Implant: A Cadaver Model of a Novel Anatomic Subdermal Implant for Cosmetic Penile Enhancement.

Authors:  Jonathan Clavell-Hernández; Alexander J Tatem; Larry I Lipshultz; Run Wang; Robert J Cornell
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 6.  Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.

Authors:  Carlo Bettocchi; Andrea Alberto Checchia; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Anna Ricapito; Gian Maria Busetto; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 7.  Penile girth enhancement procedures for aesthetic purposes.

Authors:  Celeste Manfredi; Javier Romero Otero; Rados Djinovic
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.