Literature DB >> 30145025

Health related quality of life after urinary diversion. Which technique is better?

Ahmed M Moeen1, Ahmed S Safwat2, Mohamed M Gadelmoula1, Seham M Moeen3, Ahmad Elbadry I Abonnoor1, Walid M Abbas1, Ehab O ElGanainy1, Ahmed M El-Taher1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare quality of life (QoL) after urinary diversion (UD) following radical cystectomy (RC) using validated questionnaires. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2011 and June 2016, 150 patients (121 men [80.7%] and 29 women [19.3%]) with invasive bladder cancer who underwent RC and UD were included in this prospective study. Patients were divided into 2 groups; group I included the orthotopic neobladder 50 (33.3%) and uretro-sigmoidostomy 41 (27.3%) and group II included uretero-cutanoustomy 33 (22.1%) and ileal conduit 26 (17.3%) patients. QOL was evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder Cancer. The erectile function (EF) was assessed using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men Questionnaire. Evaluation was done before and after one year postoperatively.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD patient age was 55.0 ± 7.9 and 59.5 ± 8.5 years in both groups, respectively (p = 0.001). There was a significant difference in the physical, social/family, emotional and functional statuses that were significantly higher in group I. One year postoperatively, the emotional well-being became insignificantly different, but other QoL parameters remained significantly different between both groups. Regarding EF, there was a significant difference between patients who underwent nerve-sparing (No. 29) and non nerve-sparing RC (No. 59) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Which type of diversion is the best is still a controversial topic. Egyptian patients may prefer the continent UD to avoid the urostomy appliance and its associated daily-life constraints. Detailed patient counseling and active participation of the patient in selecting the treatment methods are important for better postoperative QoL.
Copyright © 2018. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ileal conduit; Neobladder; Quality of life; Radical cystectomy; Urinary diversion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145025     DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2018.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Egypt Natl Canc Inst        ISSN: 1110-0362


  3 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes of ileal conduit and orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion.

Authors:  Eva Browne; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Greg S Jack; Niall F Davis
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Unmet needs in sexual health in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Agustina Bessa; Rebecca Martin; Christel Häggström; Deborah Enting; Suzanne Amery; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Fidelma Cahill; Harriet Wylie; Samantha Broadhead; Kathryn Chatterton; Sachin Malde; Rajesh Nair; Ramesh Thurairaja; Pardeep Kumar; Anna Haire; Saran Green; Margaret Northover; Karen Briggs; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Functional results of hautmann neobladder with chimney modification and wallace ureteroileal anastomosis: initial experience with 22 patients.

Authors:  Dejan Djordjevic; Marko Vukovic
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.