Yu-Chiao Wu1, Yi-Wen Cathy Tsai1, Wan-Chien Cheng1, Pei-Wei Weng2, Chi-Chun Su1, Ho-Sheng Chiang1, Ming-Pang Chung1, Chi-Hsiang Chung3, Yi-Shing Shieh1, Ren-Yeong Huang4. 1. School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopaedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 3. School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 4. School of Dentistry, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: ndmcandy@ndmctsgh.edu.tw.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C-shaped canal configurations (CSs) and radicular grooves (RGs) in permanent mandibular first premolars (MPs) and to investigate the relevance of such complexities with the presence of distolingual roots (DLRs) in permanent mandibular first molars (MMs). METHODS: A total of 800 pairs of MPs and MMs were investigated using a cone-beam computed tomographic system (NewTom 5G; QR srl, Verona, Italy). The frequency and symmetry of DLRs in MMs along with the occurrence of RGs and CSs in examined MPs were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the correlation between the CSs of MPs with the appearance of DLRs in MMs. RESULTS: In the examined teeth, 23.0% of MMs had a DLR, whereas 16.6% of MPs had RGs and 12.5% of MPs had C-shaped canals. Although the most common canal configuration in MPs is the single canal (74.1%), the other 25.9% still possess complicated root canals. Of these MPs that have different canal configurations, 54.6% had 2 canals, whereas 44.4% had CSs. Specifically, the CS showed a high prevalence of C3 morphologies at 98.9% followed by C1 at 1.1%. A corresponding and increasing frequency was noted in CSs and RGs of MPs and MMs with DLRs (P < .001). After adjusting for related categoric variables, the adjusted odds ratios for CSs of MPs in the bilateral DLR group compared with the non-DLR group was 3.294 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed an increased appearance of CSs in MPs when DLRs were present in MMs in the Taiwanese population.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of C-shaped canal configurations (CSs) and radicular grooves (RGs) in permanent mandibular first premolars (MPs) and to investigate the relevance of such complexities with the presence of distolingual roots (DLRs) in permanent mandibular first molars (MMs). METHODS: A total of 800 pairs of MPs and MMs were investigated using a cone-beam computed tomographic system (NewTom 5G; QR srl, Verona, Italy). The frequency and symmetry of DLRs in MMs along with the occurrence of RGs and CSs in examined MPs were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the correlation between the CSs of MPs with the appearance of DLRs in MMs. RESULTS: In the examined teeth, 23.0% of MMs had a DLR, whereas 16.6% of MPs had RGs and 12.5% of MPs had C-shaped canals. Although the most common canal configuration in MPs is the single canal (74.1%), the other 25.9% still possess complicated root canals. Of these MPs that have different canal configurations, 54.6% had 2 canals, whereas 44.4% had CSs. Specifically, the CS showed a high prevalence of C3 morphologies at 98.9% followed by C1 at 1.1%. A corresponding and increasing frequency was noted in CSs and RGs of MPs and MMs with DLRs (P < .001). After adjusting for related categoric variables, the adjusted odds ratios for CSs of MPs in the bilateral DLR group compared with the non-DLR group was 3.294 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed an increased appearance of CSs in MPs when DLRs were present in MMs in the Taiwanese population.