Sofia Sveréus1, Gustav Kjellsson2, Clas Rehnberg3. 1. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME), Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: sofia.svereus@ki.se. 2. Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Centre for Health Economics at the University of Gothenburg (CHEGU), Gothenburg, Sweden. 3. Department of Learning, Informatics, Management & Ethics (LIME), Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyse changes in the socioeconomic distribution of GP visits following primary care patient choice reform, and to compare their magnitude and direction in pure capitation, versus capitation/activity-based mixed, provider reimbursement settings. METHODS: We compute absolute and relative concentration indices using total population registry data from three Swedish counties (N∼3.6 million) two years pre, to two years post, reform. We decompose the indices by the contribution of first, non-recurrent and recurrent visits, and compare their changes in the different provider reimbursement settings. RESULTS: In all three counties, the number of visits increased for all population groups. Increases were larger, and distributional changes more pro-poor, in the county with mixed reimbursement. Visit increases were mostly driven by recurrent and, especially, non-recurrent, visits, which were increasingly pro-poor in all counties in absolute, but not in relative, terms. First visits either became decreasingly pro-poor, or did not change significantly. Exclusion of high users removed the pro-poor patterns in the two counties with pure capitation. CONCLUSIONS: The reform led to increased access to GP visits, but implied small changes in their socioeconomic distribution. In combination with provider reimbursement models with incentives for higher visit volumes, changes were more pro-poor over time, but it is not clear whether this was at the expense of reduced visit length or content.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyse changes in the socioeconomic distribution of GP visits following primary care patient choice reform, and to compare their magnitude and direction in pure capitation, versus capitation/activity-based mixed, provider reimbursement settings. METHODS: We compute absolute and relative concentration indices using total population registry data from three Swedish counties (N∼3.6 million) two years pre, to two years post, reform. We decompose the indices by the contribution of first, non-recurrent and recurrent visits, and compare their changes in the different provider reimbursement settings. RESULTS: In all three counties, the number of visits increased for all population groups. Increases were larger, and distributional changes more pro-poor, in the county with mixed reimbursement. Visit increases were mostly driven by recurrent and, especially, non-recurrent, visits, which were increasingly pro-poor in all counties in absolute, but not in relative, terms. First visits either became decreasingly pro-poor, or did not change significantly. Exclusion of high users removed the pro-poor patterns in the two counties with pure capitation. CONCLUSIONS: The reform led to increased access to GP visits, but implied small changes in their socioeconomic distribution. In combination with provider reimbursement models with incentives for higher visit volumes, changes were more pro-poor over time, but it is not clear whether this was at the expense of reduced visit length or content.